Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Chris Tomlin

AoS 2 - Fyreslayers Discussion

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JackStreicher said:

GW is Ultra Slow concerning point adjustments. The entire SCE book has been out if balance due to bad point values and GW did not change it.

imo the berserkers are actually gamebreaking... :(

The points adjustments come in the ghb which is only a few months away now. The biggest concern is that the fyreslayers may have missed the printing deadline. 

Ghb 2019 will be the first points patch for AoS 2. Stormcast came out just after the last ghb. They were never going to change their points until ghb 2019.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People need to calm down about the HGB's price until dice have actually been rolled, they were sub-par and meh before and now actually feel like an elite unit. Their output and sustain does look potentially scary but requires further points investments in bodies and heroes to it pull off. Also remember Duardin don't have natural free access to wizards and their potential MW output, so require it in other places. There is also no healing or summoning mechanic in the army so relying on  +1 to saves is a form of sustain. The overall model count in going to be much less than before so taking the horde approach won't give your enough heroes and aura's required to make the army function in the same design as it did before. 

Also remember before you were paying 100 points for 5 wounds 120 for 10 seems more fair the 160-200 bracket usually applies to 3 wound models. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I am quite happy, now we can play the Vulkites in various ways, the Herthguard seems to be the key in the competitive environment, but it is still too early to say, now we can use the Magmadroth more than ever and the heroes simply have a different approach (which at least for me is very good)

Having said that, I understand the people who had 120 Vulkites in their house and now (for the moment, in the absence of seeing the book) they do not see the same use, but what is said is still soon, I see them for example on the screen. typical hard bug (Terror flesh eater), sure you think twice before loading 2 screens of vulkites that when killed (which will kill) attacked 20 pissed off dwarves .....

and we need to see the objects, the lodges ..... remember that the authentic good thing of the book of the flesh eater for example, is in the different houses .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chikout said:

The points adjustments come in the ghb which is only a few months away now. The biggest concern is that the fyreslayers may have missed the printing deadline. 

Ghb 2019 will be the first points patch for AoS 2. Stormcast came out just after the last ghb. They were never going to change their points until ghb 2019.

 

You just confirmed what I said. One point fix a year (especially if they keep slapping points on units as lazily as in the past) simply isn‘t enough.

 

I‘d like to see a batrep though in which s.o. Abuses the hell out of those Hearthguard since I can see no way any army can beat 2 unit’s of 30

(they hold objectives, have a huge footprint so they can actually hold 2 per 30, they cover a big portion of the map, they just don‘t die, they‘ve 60 wounds that are too hard to kill, they have mass, they have absurd damage already if they‘re unbuffed)

Edited by JackStreicher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chikout said:

The points adjustments come in the ghb which is only a few months away now. The biggest concern is that the fyreslayers may have missed the printing deadline. 

Ghb 2019 will be the first points patch for AoS 2. Stormcast came out just after the last ghb. They were never going to change their points until ghb 2019.

 

Even DoK missed the GHB 2018 point change right? And they came out pretty early 2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, j0lt said:

Love the models and the fluff, but this is exactly why I committed to other projects despite my love for the stunties.

Hopefully this release will rekindle the fyre to get the project I planned started again.

Everything else aside, this is definitely true. They're not the horde army they used to be and I don't see the days of 90x Vulkites every coming back.

Looking at my fairly modest Fyreslayer investment, for example. I have 40 vulkites, 20 HGB in groups of 10, and 15 Aurics.

That's 640+480+360 or 1480 points worth of just troops in 75 models. Realistically I'll never even field that many guys on the table simultaneously. Likewise my 4 Magmadroths represent 1060 points worth of leadership, My little questing band of 2 Grimwrath+Doomseeker heroes is 300 points, ect.

I've got enough guys for multiple builds and any battalion and that's enough for me.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, PJetski said:

I'm far more concerned about stacking save bonuses

I mean they faq'd Skullcannons not getting extra attacks from wrathmongers, if it becomes a problem they'll slap it down. (even though people do say that was an unfair treatment)

When it comes to "vague" RAI vs RAW rules, I always try to take the safe bet that something sounds too good to be true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, kenshin620 said:

I mean they faq'd Skullcannons not getting extra attacks from wrathmongers, if it becomes a problem they'll slap it down. (even though people do say that was an unfair treatment)

Because we never got the chance to test it. Considering the copy & paste errors within the new BoK book, neither did the developers.

The funniest thing is, that one of the developers said that Wrathmongers buffing the cannons was intended when asked on stream...

At least, it seems that the guys working on Fyreslayers were a lot more passionate about the army than the interns scraping together the last couple Khorne books.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually a well buffed unit of 30 hb with hermdar Lodge, Lord of the lodge battalion and buff from 2 priest and battlesmith coul be an horror like this:

2+ rerollable save, 4+ fnp, - 1 to be hit - 1 to be wounded, fight 2x phase and unbreakable 

And thats not even accounting for rune Alliance ability or specific magical items. 

Regarding the wolly within the runefhather on maghmadrot with 24"diameter and large base will have no problem, the battlesmith can take standard to augment his range to 18 with 36 diameter. 

Edited by Arael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, madmac said:

Everything else aside, this is definitely true. They're not the horde army they used to be and I don't see the days of 90x Vulkites every coming back.

Looking at my fairly modest Fyreslayer investment, for example. I have 40 vulkites, 20 HGB in groups of 10, and 15 Aurics.

That's 640+480+360 or 1480 points worth of just troops in 75 models. Realistically I'll never even field that many guys on the table simultaneously. Likewise my 4 Magmadroths represent 1060 points worth of leadership, My little questing band of 2 Grimwrath+Doomseeker heroes is 300 points, ect.

I've got enough guys for multiple builds and any battalion and that's enough for me.

Yes, all the reviews I've read have convinced me that they have gone back in the right direction 👌🏻

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's allow the faction be out for a couple months before crying "OP." People are smart and find counters to things, that's what's going on with Gristlegore and Skaven right now. New rules need time to breath on the tables. So maybe we all calm down and enjoy the wash of excitement that we'll have yet another dope army to play with/against.

Edited by Mutton
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that hearthguards berzerers are very nice.

 

But a nerf in points isnt probable because we have in aos2 many units that are so good or better and havent nerfed.

 

Per example the new goblin knigths in squigs have been around months and are very very similar to hearthguard.

 

Have the same wounds(10) better regular save (4) but havent the 4++. 

Have as double move than us(2d6 are a median of 7 move)

Have the same atacks(20 attacks of 3hit 3 wound -1 1 damage is the same than us,a total of 20 damage)

But they do 2'5 mortal wounds per round that we dont

And the cost 100 so 20 less.

 

So they have a little worse save if we have the 4++,have better damage output with the same regular damage but mortal wounds,double move than us and cost 20 points less.

 

So my point is: hearthguard are veeeeery good,but aos2 tomes have units so good or better and havent been nerfed yet so it is soon to call overpower to hearthguards.

I have been pretty negative with the changues and i gonna try test them before more negative feedback.

 

I know that in offitial tournament they wont let you,but in my local tournaments i gonna use my vulkites as proxys of hearthguard with no problem

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, kenshin620 said:

When it comes to "vague" RAI vs RAW rules, I always try to take the safe bet that something sounds too good to be true.

The latest Miniwargaming video (vault) shows how 4-10 of the Hearthguard slaughter everything they touch with their MWs. A Gorgon gets oneshotted against 7?  Of them etc. they played them as one big blob of 30 and it was absurd.

I really want to see more tests with them though. Since the first impression might be wrong though the math agrees on it.

@prochuvi Hearthguard deal more dmg and are way tankier (and pretty easily buffed), they hit and wound on 3s etc.

Edited by JackStreicher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because do more damage?

 

Squig knigth do 20 attacks,4 hit,3 to wound,-1 rend 1 damage=6'6damage also do mortal wound by each model with a 4+ so a unit of 5 do 2'5 mortal wounds

 

So 100 points for 6'6damage with 1 rend and 2'5 mortals wound

 

Now hearthguards, have two options

 

Option1 the poleaxes are 10 attacks 3 hit 3 wound -1 rend 2 damage=8'8 damage and havent mortal wounds

 

Option2 the censer are 10 attacks 3 hit 3 wound 0 rend 1 damage=4'4 damage with no rend and do mortal wounds with the 6 to hit that are 2 extra mortal wounds that 10 attacks= 3'3 mortal wounds

So:

 

Squigs: 6'6 damage with 1 rend and 2'5 mortal wounds for 100 points

Hearthguard: 

Option1 poleaxes: 8'8 damage with 1 rend and 0 mortals,so same rend1 damage but 2'5 less mortals wound for 120 points

Option2 censer: 4'4 damage with 0 rend and 3'3 mortal wounds for 120 points that it is 2'5 less damage than squigs and with 0 ap and do 0'8 mortal wound more thsn squig for 20 more points.

 

I think that squigs do more damage than both versions of hearthguard if i havent done any math bad.

Also yes we have many buffs for them but squigs also have maybe more buffs for them than us as the moon,the colosal squig or many spells.

Also squig cost 20% less and have 16% worse save(save of 4 vs save of 5\4++ is a 16% worse save) so per points hearthguard are less tank

Dont get me wrong,hearthguard are very good but i think the game have some units so good or better than they as the squig knigth that havent been nerfed yet,so it isnt problable they are nerfed soon

 

Edit:i did some math wrong so i had to redo

Edited by prochuvi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, prochuvi said:

Because do more damage?

 

Squig knigth do 20 attacks,4 hit,3 to wound,-1 rend 1 damage=6'6damage also do mortal wound by each model with a 4+ so a unit of 5 do 2'5 mortal wounds

 

So 100 points for 6'6damage with 1 rend and 2'5 mortals wound

 

Now hearthguards, have two options

 

Option1 the poleaxes are 10 attacks 3 hit 3 wound -1 rend 2 damage=8'8 damage and havent mortal wounds

 

Option2 the censer are 10 attacks 3 hit 3 wound 0 rend 1 damage=4'4 damage with no rend and do mortal wounds with the 6 to hit that are 2 extra mortal wounds that 10 attacks= 3'3 mortal wounds

So:

 

Squigs: 6'6 damage with 1 rend and 2'5 mortal wounds for 100 points

Hearthguard: 

Option1 poleaxes: 8'8 damage with 1 rend and 0 mortals,so same rend1 damage but 2'5 less mortals wound for 120 points

Option2 censer: 4'4 damage with 0 rend and 3'3 mortal wounds for 120 points that it is 2'5 less damage than squigs and with 0 ap and do 0'8 mortal wound more thsn squig for 20 more points.

 

I think that squigs do more damage than both versions of hearthguard if i havent done any math bad.

Also yes we have many buffs for them but squigs also have maybe more buffs for them than us as the moon,the colosal squig or many spells.

Also squig cost 20% less and have 16% worse save(save of 4 vs save of 5\4++ is a 16% worse save) so per points hearthguard are less tank

Dont get me wrong,hearthguard are very good but i think the game have some units so good or better than they as the squig knigth that havent been nerfed yet,so it isnt problable they are nerfed soon

 

Edit:i did some math wrong so i had to redo

The problem is your calculated normal heartguards vs squigs in charge. Outside of charging, the squigs damage go down A LOT (no mortal wounds, -1 to wound), while heartguard are consistent and kick ass in every situation against everyone.

the 4++ save change absolutely everything too, and make the heartguard extremely sturdy, and is easy to have ( a single hero WITHIN 10").

Plus, the heartguard have a 2" range, which isn't the case of the squigs (only the spear have a 2" range).  So big units of hearthguards will do much more damage (cause more people in range), don't rely on the charge (unlike the squigs), making them more consistent, and don't have a 5" bravery making them going away as soon as they take a few casualties.

Plus fyreslayers have access to a lot more buffs (army wide) that the gitz can't pile-up.

Edited by ledha
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JackStreicher said:

The latest Miniwargaming video (vault) shows how 4-10 of the Hearthguard slaughter everything they touch with their MWs. A Gorgon gets oneshotted against 7?  Of them etc. they played them as one big blob of 30 and it was absurd.

I really want to see more tests with them though. Since the first impression might be wrong though the math agrees on it.

Oh my comment wasnt on Hearthguard, it was the Armor Stacking. Something tells me you're not suppose to have 2+ Armor Save fyreslayers!

 

Unless you are and every army should have 2-3 battlesmiths all hugging each other! Naked Slayers being tankier than Ironbreakers sure sounds weird.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, kenshin620 said:

Oh my comment wasnt on Hearthguard, it was the Armor Stacking. Something tells me you're not suppose to have 2+ Armor Save fyreslayers!

 

Unless you are and every army should have 2-3 battlesmiths all hugging each other! Naked Slayers being tankier than Ironbreakers sure sounds weird.

People like to say they're just "naked dwarfs," but to be fair, they do have magical god-metal infused into their bodies. But I do think that rule will get changed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's probably a good idea to have a spare battlesmith anyways when they get inevitably sniped. Got to have those heroes giving the hearthguard their better wardsaves!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, j0lt said:

Love the models and the fluff, but this is exactly why I committed to other projects despite my love for the stunties.

Hopefully this release will rekindle the fyre to get the project I planned started again.

I’m glad a lower model count is how things seemed to have worked out. I started my fyreslayers about a year ago but got burnt out painting them- I didn’t hate painting them as such, but after doing 20 vulkites the idea that I’d probably have to do another 30-40 at least killed it for me. I actually toyed with the idea of a large unit of hearthguard back then, but decided not when I realised how expensive (in £) that was going to be. Then deepkin came out and I got distracted. 

I tried to get the army going again at the start of the year as I’d enjoyed small games with them, and was just starting to get burned out again when the news of the new book came out, which really gave me a boost. It means now, far from still having a seemingly endless hoard of Vulkites still to get through, I’ve actually got enough to field a 2000 points army, with enough spare to tinker with a few different builds. It’s really got me excited to get them out into the table, and I dare say I even enjoyed painting the last few vulkites I had as a result! 

I do feel sorry for anyone who did soldier on through 90 Vulkites, although that’s still perfectly usable (just not optimal anymore) but for you and anyone else thinking of jumping in, now feels like a good time.  2 start collecting kits is basically a 1000 point army, and you’re not shooting yourself in the foot by taking small berserker units anymore, so it’s far easier to get going now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to have different opinions, I'm assembling Vulkites and now that we can play them by group of 10 I thought it might be better to put shields on them to make them guardian units. However the double axes remain interesting especially with the berserker aptitude ...

Any thought?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, looking into starting fyreslayers myself in the near future. I’ll likely end up with 20 or so HGB but I’m not sure what to equip them with? The poleaxes look great for mortal wounds but the Broadaxes seem a little more reliable. Which way would you guys go?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What better time to get back onto TGA than now ;) I'm over the Bad Moon about my army getting an update. Mixed feelings, trying to take it all in stride and most importantly wait until I get my book to read and know the scrolls, options, etc. in context. Going to easily cross the 300 games solo Fyreslayers mark by Midwest Meltdown (USA) in July :) 

I'm curious to hear what everyone thinks. Apologies, just now got back onto this forum so I haven't gone back through all the post since I last was active like a year ago. When the Fyreslayers group on Facebook crossed 1,000 members we made dice. Yesterday with the release it crossed 2,000 members (something I could never have imagined when I started it 3 years ago with only myself and 2 other members) and we're discussing what item to create to celebrate--maybe a 9" ruler or something, so if you have ideas I'm open to hearing them.

Anyway...the biggest change I'm focusing on and need to wrap my brain around is a move from a hoard army (cuz, y'know, we only have 3 non-hero units) to now seems pointed for an elite army.  Less models will be an adjustment, though I am also starting Stormcasts so that's an elite army with less than 100 models on the table). Excited to hear your thoughts about what we know so far. I've already seen some interesting lists on the Facebook group. I plan on trying all the lodges and item/trait combos for a month or so try see what suits my play style and unholy bad Kennynomics dice rolling curse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Xelotath said:

Hi all, looking into starting fyreslayers myself in the near future. I’ll likely end up with 20 or so HGB but I’m not sure what to equip them with? The poleaxes look great for mortal wounds but the Broadaxes seem a little more reliable. Which way would you guys go?

I've built another 40 poleaxes (70 now in total) to deal with Flesh Eaters and Skaven so I'll have to see the full arsenal in the new tome but they still seem miles ahead of broadaxes IMO, and they actually didn't lose their Hair Save. :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...