Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Xasz

Members
  • Content Count

    844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Xasz last won the day on June 16 2018

Xasz had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

471 Celestant-Prime

1 Follower

About Xasz

  • Rank
    Lord Castellant

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Not sure, it's hard to free up the points to pump both units. Even with just one you would lose the Wrathmongers + something else or other choices. Maybe it's a good point to talk about list building or at least how I approach it, would fit nicely with the Blood Warrior and "screen" discussion that popped up recently. There are some metrics thrown around which form the basics for every meaningful evaluation like ppm (points per model) or effective health. They have value but they have to be translated to some degree. In Magic the Gathering there is the concept of hidden or alternative card text, like a creature that does 2 damage when entering the battlefield and has 2/1 stats for 2 mana would often translate into deal 4 damage to your opponent, deal 2 and remove a card from your opponents hand or deal 2 and kill a creature. For tabletops there is something similar and at the same time completely different, the question about how likely it is that a unit does use everything you paid for. Which cannot be math-hammered in any meaningful way (at least not in a way that is always true). Example, when I bring a unit of Blood Warriors, I pay for their offensive abilities, their defensive abilities and stuff that falls in neither of those categories. If such a unit is neither being hit or actually attacks I wasted points for stuff that was not used. If this happens a lot of times this unit can be described as "fat" of the list. That's pretty much why we use the cheapest units with the biggest footprint possible for screens, because we don't want to waste points (there are some other things that are important here, like you often actually want your screen to be wiped out to make room for your counterattack and so on, this is why Blood Warriors are godawful screens, a more fitting term for Chaos Warriors and the like would be "holders" as they tend to stand on key places and try to just survive). The same principle applies to unit sizes and the question how many of those models will actually be active. For a unit of 30 Blood Warriors, with a reasonable amount of scenery on the table, this number will be rather low and one has to ask himself if this is really a good idea. Same applies to models with 40mm bases, which are especially unwieldy. I highly doubt that a 10 man unit of Skullreapers will actually have a high activity among models. You could argue that the additional models makes the unit more resilient and you are surely in the right with that one but if at the end of the battle there are always 5+ models alive, you probably paid good points for low gain -> fat (More of X doesn't always translate into better for purpose Y). In my games up till now, 5 felt like a good number as about 2 Skullreaper models per unit (or none) survived the battles with no units to fight in close proximity. That being said, 10 might still be better in some cases. So why even bother with big blobs when most of the models have a low activity rating? Because blobs are usually about surviving stuff and defensive capabilities (low ppm with high wound/effective wounds count). Some of them are capable of damage but that might not be their selling point (e.g. Nurgle Marauders or Chainrasps) or the unit has low effective wounds but also low ppm. In this case you add models too keep the potential count of active models high enough that it actually matters when close combat happens (Bloodletter come to mind). Problem with all of this, that there is no clear line or ultimate truth (parking 30 Blood Warriors on a objective might be really good) but questioning unit choices and purpose of things you bring to the table can make a list significant better. Just adding units with good stats or comparing unit A with unit B without considering context or purpose is usually not enough. The concept of "razor's edge" from sports is oddly fitting for list building and revisions. You want to cut as much fat as possible but you don't want (but might) cut things that are actually important for the system to work properly (e.g. a runner cutting so much body fat that they actually collapse instead of having a peak performance). I feel like I'm writing without actually getting to the point and taking a nose dive into rambling but maybe the gist of it comes across. TLDR: don't pay points for things that are not used (defensive capabilities, offensive capabilities) consider the logistics of the table/battlefield remind yourself that models that tend to be not active are wasted points (considering units meant for fighting) exception to the previous point: units with low wound count or defensive capabilities that need additional models to reach combat in a meaningful size any unit needs to have a purpose and do "something" otherwise it's obsolete reevaluate units and try to identify "fat" in your list nothing is really set in stone but evaluation is always useful (with metrics and consideration of context)
  2. Why wouldn't I use the altar? Not sure how you got that impression. That one game was just incredible bad luck, sometimes you do not roll 5s for the axe. The axes vs gore fists debate pops up about every 10-30 pages and down the line they are about even but do different things (the debate always ends inconclusive but fills a couple pages nonetheless). Personally, I prefer Gore Fists as they provide mortal wounds and look cooler imo. I'm just testing one unit of axes for my slingshot Blood Warriors as I might want the extra punch but the difference between both units is not really noticeable.
  3. 20+ feels too unwieldy for my tastes (I tried 30 at some point). I played with units of 15 before which felt rather tanky and still flexible. So if you have some points left, why not. Up till now I did not have the feeling that the Blood Warriors should be bigger or smaller. It's not like you want to charge a unit into your opponent every game or turn. I think of it more as a tool than the one and only gimmick of mortals, which refreshingly do not need a lot of CP to function. ... and as another poster said, it distributes the power more evenly through the list, although the difference between 200 and 300 is negligible.
  4. One word regarding the Bloodmad Warband that has taken up in popularity the last couple pages. It's a nice effect but heavily redundant with the rest of what Khorne does. The actual benefit after you buffed a unit already with +1A or +2A is negligible (considering low to medium model count units). Furthermore, it has a rather hard condition and solves none of Khorne's problems.
  5. Played another game with Mortal Khorne yesterday. Same list as a couple pages ago. Basic idea behind the list is having one big "formation" with two units of Blood Warriors in front, Aspiring Deathbringer, Wrathmongers and whatever behind that. Makes for a really annoying blob of units and buffs. Skullreapers are either to the flanks or where ever they are needed, they are not really dependent on any additional buffs. The Blood Warrior unit with axes is used as target for the Goretide catapult if the chance arises or the opponent makes a mistake (worked like a charm in my first game against a Celestar). Game was against Nighthaunt with the big banshee lady, a lot of characters, two big units of elite ghosts (Bladeghast, Grimghast), a big unit of Chainrasps and some small stuff like minimum Hexwraiths, some Glaivewraiths and Cogs. Scenario was Total Commitment. I messed up in the beginning and he got to choose who gets priority, which promptly was given to me. Like always my opponent then got the double turn on turn 2 and rushed one of my objectives with a big unit of ghosts. He pretty much denied my stronger flank (we had a huge blocker in the middle of the table) and went for my weaker side, clipped my axe Blood Warriors with another unit and killed my Reavers off the objective. My two priests almost killed two of his characters with Bloodboil and the Wrath-Axe, one unit of Skullreapers rushed to retake my objective and the other plus two units of Blood Warriors rushed to the other side. Due to Slaughterborn, an activation of Apoplectic Frenzy on a unit of Skullreapers and the sheer amount of grind potential, his army was gone by the end of turn 3. Even with his cushion of points I ended up winning through having all objectives for a couple turns. Some thoughts about my list: I am convinced that Slaughterborn, while pricey, is the most competitive Mortals setup -1 rend is pretty common and the effect hits all the working parts (was absolute MVP against Nighthaunt) not having a dedicated hammer is sometimes weird but not having to care about characters is liberating characters dying is not a huge hit and equals Blood Tithe, sometimes sacrificing them via priests is a good move (e.g. Stoker when he no longer has targets or purpose) Wrath-axe was useless in Celestar game (no successful summon) but almost a match winner in the last one, it's almost like having another priest for less points that is not using a leader slot I don't feel like changing anything for now, everything has a clear purpose maybe kicking the Wrathmongers and trying to squeeze in the Manticore Lord but over all it feels like weakening the core concept of the list Some thoughts considering Khorne over all, Khorne feels like a mid to low tier 2 army (so pretty much the same as the last 3 years, except some small spikes through Skullreaper + Sayl bomb or Murderhost) which is fine by me, more or less a harsh FAQ for DoK and point changes for SCE and other under-costed armies could do wonders the change from command abilities being used in the hero phase and now being used whenever they become relevant is super awkward, especially if you play AoS for quite some time (it might be more intuitive and interactive in the long run though) the most annoying thing about the new book for me are some unnecessary inconsistencies, i.e. abilities that are similar should work in a similar way (e.g. Skullreaper, Wrathmonger ability on death or 1s on prayers doing 1 or D3 damage) Most of the time this feels like obvious oversights or design-clutter, the weird FAQ on Wrathmongers doesn't help to shake off this notion I'll keep playing my grindy mortal list until my Bloodthirsters arrive and I'll try to provide some pictures in the future.
  6. Expensive model with low wound count that has to be in melee range to do most of his interesting stuff. Bloodsecrator is rather expensive at 140 as well, but what he does is a lot less conditional and works regardless of his range to the enemy lines. Heroes that you want to use in combat should either be expendable or durable, Khul is neither. Which means you pay a lot of points for a fancy command ability, which is rarely worth it.
  7. I'm probably too judgmental, but how dafuq did you clip his priests when he had screening units available and handed you the first turn... was his measuring tape broken or something? I mean, Blood Warriors are super annoying for every melee army but it seems he pretty much dumbstered himself. (At least I got reminded of Aetherquartz Brooch, totally forgot about that one!) The problem with Skullreapers and Khorne (especially the mortal side) is reliable MW output. Volume of attacks was always our selling point but getting into range and then doing reasonable damage is another story.
  8. Xasz

    Artefacts

    Core Rules page 17, at the bottom.
  9. Sorry, I didn't get you there. This question was answered in the FAQ of the previous edition and is now in the Core Rules. A Normal Move means that you can move the distance shown on the warscroll. Furthermore, you can run and you can retreat as part of a normal move.
  10. I think that's a common mistake, especially if you come from Oldhammer, but the Battleshock Phase is completely separate from combat. Murderlust is the move/charge, I think you mean Apoplectic Frenzy which is activated at the start of the Hero Phase... so no No Respite or Relentless Fury as well.
  11. Both of those effects check for Combat Phase, which is resolved before the Battleshock Phase.
  12. Facebook comes to mind if you use it but I'd guess that negative stuff gets removed. Maybe through the WarhammerTV stream but the chat might be in subscriber-only-mode or moderated as well.
  13. Because we never got the chance to test it. Considering the copy & paste errors within the new BoK book, neither did the developers. The funniest thing is, that one of the developers said that Wrathmongers buffing the cannons was intended when asked on stream... At least, it seems that the guys working on Fyreslayers were a lot more passionate about the army than the interns scraping together the last couple Khorne books.
  14. It's usable in matched play, at least I don't see a reason why it shouldn't be (we are no longer in AoS 1.0 with summoning points, where these abilities were rather restricted). For the second question, if the rule text mentions that the unit has to be wholly within 9" or whatever, every single model in that unit has to be completely (base-wise) within that bubble. On the other hand, if the rule text only requires you to be within a certain range, a single model is enough and it doesn't even require the whole base to be inside.
  15. You missed something... and this section refers to the prayers listed on the respective page. You cannot roll for prayers that are already on the warscroll and are already known by the unit. They are prayers and due to the wording you can do per turn: one prayer from the scroll, the chosen Blood Blessing and one judgement from your list. Blood Blessings and judgements have some additional restrictions that do not apply to warscroll prayers. You can only try to cast each blood blessing and judgement once per turn (similar to spells). Warscroll prayers are still spamable and you can cast Blood Boil as many times as you have priests available.
×
×
  • Create New...