Jump to content

kenshin620

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,865

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by kenshin620

  1. kenshin620
    Those eyes are staring right into my soul!
  2. kenshin620
    Yea, no offense to anyone on this forum but I kind of hate it when someone mentions that either their army is a one drop or their army can't fit into a one drop. I'm looking at you pre 2.0 book sylvaneth topic!
  3. kenshin620
    But Legions of Nagash doesn't actually exist anyways as a faction keyword. Thus by that definition you can't take the battalion in Grand Host of Nagash or Legion of Blood/Night/Sacrament! 😜
  4. kenshin620
    Both Azyr and Warscroll builder are not 100% accurate keep in mind. For example the warscroll builder still has Sayl the Faithless and the Godswron Hunt underworlds warband in all the god armies despite the fact they can't take marks! But yea Ungors are Battleline irregardless of army, as long as they aren't taken as an ally. The only exception to the battleline thing is tzaangors cause you got 2 forms of tzaangors and the tzeentch tzaangors are battleline in GA Chaos while BoC arent. For some reason...
  5. kenshin620
    Haflings are back baby!
  6. kenshin620
    Ahh yea I think it swaps between per box and per unit increment. If something is 10-20 model increments, then it's usually per unit increment. If something is 5 (or less) unit increment, then its per box. Usually..... (and thats why Sequitors can have so many special weapons, because it's per box!) If one was really worried about looks vs rules, could always have a banner/instrument be magnetized to the base? Then take off when not needed.
  7. kenshin620
    I believe though best practice was 1 command set per box number if it was not specified. At least I think thats how most tournaments did. If mono - modeling is an issue, could always make different looking banner and musicians. Honestly for Slaanesh it would make sense for them to be obsessed with fancy banners and instruments anyways! (I mean even historicals have a lot of banners depending on the time period/modelers preference)
  8. kenshin620
    It's funny really, while many people are put off by the scale of historical, I think sometimes it works in the favor of warhammer, making things like SCE or Space Marines look more heroic/intimidating!
  9. kenshin620
    Also to be fair there has been the Eisenhorn Inquisitor model. Inquisition in 40k is probably still not going to be army for a long, long time if ever...
  10. kenshin620
    Great theme idea!
  11. kenshin620
    Great use of the warlord renaissance range. I always tell myself one of these days I'll make a freeguild army with perry/warlord, harken back to the days when the Empire could all have shoes!
  12. kenshin620
    Yea it's mostly about how to utilize the sprue/runner space. Though some other companies took it too far, like what happened with the ill fated Robotech (cough macross) game. I can't believe each arm requires +5 parts...
  13. kenshin620
    More heroes, so that your depravity points generate more depravity points! Or like 10 daemonettes to grab an objective Start Collecting is a good deal though, you can get really creative with what you get on the box. You could make a number of Heralds with all the fancy heads.
  14. kenshin620
    It's also not 100% accurate. It is by all accounts a fan made project. For example it keeps thinking Darkoath models can take marks of chaos, which they can't (such as the shadespire warband). No offense to the warscroll builder person, I know he frequents the forum sometimes! But AoS is a bit more convoluted on what goes where, not like say Warmahordes and their builders which flat out states "hey this unit goes in this theme force").
  15. kenshin620
    The price they'll be in the aelf book!
  16. kenshin620
    Well yea I think Slaanesh is not broken tier, but it definitely is in a good spot. Probably right now the best God army.
  17. kenshin620
    Keep in mind a lot of people are frustrated at the lack of meaningful point changes in addition to many problems arising from old warscrolls. And right now FEC/Skaven/Slaanesh are this year's DoK so they want to see those armies taken down a peg or two.
  18. kenshin620
    I think because it's a slippery slope where if you change one rule, mind as well change them all. And each community would have it's own tastes Not saying it's wrong to make homebrew rules, I love homebrew rules. But I recognize that people like official consistency...even if said consistency is 'wrong'. Otherwise I'm sure we'd all pack our bags and have our own 9th Age Sigmar flavored. I'm actually curious to see if people would make their own aos system.
  19. kenshin620
    Cool contrast paint schemes!
  20. kenshin620
    Aetherquartz brooch ahoy!
  21. kenshin620
    Should be some youtube videos around I think.
  22. kenshin620
    I've learn to never be too optimistic whenever gw mentions big changes outside of an actual codex/BT. Anyone here remember 40k 5th edition? When they were making "the big faq that was suppose to fix everything" especially in regards to no one having access to Skyfire+Interceptor? That was a funny time.
  23. kenshin620
    Well they did specifically mention the compendium rules in their previews. But as for AoS specific stuff, they don't like "confusing" new players with models you can't get a hold of outside of ebay (not counting the darn sold out VS boxes that are still somehow not reboxed yet. what is taking them so long!). I didn't check, do they still have the oop units from Swifthawk Agents or not?
  24. kenshin620
    "If we dont sell it, it has no rules!" - GW circa 2019. Well just use the ghb2018 points I guess and have the warscroll pdf on hand.
  25. kenshin620
    I swear I have seen this reaction in every topic in regards to point changes. Unless it's Bonesplitterz in which case they didn't get any changes for either a reason or no reason!
×
×
  • Create New...