Sedraxis

Not when you consider that the 500 point unit does can do other stuff as well and the 260 point unit needs to be supported by resources and spells from other expensive units to stand a chance. And even then you are playing their strong suit (melee), theres still the option of shooting and only engaging in favorable melee combat.

On the matter of SCE vs OBR. The main weakness of OBR lies in their low movement and model quantity. SCE has the ability to take control early through deploying all over the map. If you can force them to split up you can pick their units off one by one. OBR also shares our weakness to mortal wounds, so if you can Gavriel bomb/charge them with Evocators you can take out key pieces like Arkhan or other heroes. Same for Longstrikes. Another thing is the Crawler, it shuts down when enemies get within 3" because of its minimum range, devoting one or 2 cheap units to that might be worthwhile.

Why wouldn't Foul Regenesis be part of the Lore of Nurgle? It's a Nurgle specific spell on the page covering the Lore of Nurgle. I have never heard anyone doubt this before.

The problem with crawlers is that you cannot leave them alone, if the enemy gets a unit within 3" they turn off. The other problem is that the guard move at 4 (7 with the CA) so getting on objectives turn 1 isn't guaranteed unless you also invest in fast units. Basically, I think OBR is one of the best examples of balance since every unit is worth considering over another and every 2k list will have one or two weaknesses. I wish every book did this.

I believe the idea is that they spend their movement phase taking on the formation/aiming instead of moving, so it makes sense to me. Also the point reductions seem pretty cool, dracolines and big dragons have a nice role to fill in the army since they don't need the deepstrikes to get in position.

This goes for every unit in the game with multiple weapon options.

In the new tome, are any of the units in the pictures using mixed weapon options?

Cogs modifies the move characteristic. Comet looks at the move characteristic, it doesn't say unmodified so Cogs makes it harder for the comet to deal d6 mortal wounds.

I don't think LoN will see another update, same with Cities of Sigmar. It feels like a final goodbye Battletome and eventually the older models/units will make room for new ones. Personally I would love a small update to warscrolls/mechanics to update everything to wholly within/unmodified rolls for every pre-2.0 tome. There may be another new death army in the works for the next couple of years, but I don't see Soulblight/Deathrattle getting a new Battletome or new models. For now Death feels pretty up to date with 4 main tomes, not bad considering LoN was the only real update in a long time before the NH, FEC and OB happened.

I'm pretty sure they mean that those battalions can be played in any faction in that Battletome. The same Battletome also includes information on factions, so even tho it's a mess of rules and keywords it checks out. Legion of Grief not including Nighthaunt battalions is a choice, they didn't include them in a very specific list of models that they are able to take. On what they should do: GW should make sure that every tome includes all options it is allowed to take and doesn't use different wording every time. Every errata, tome or warscroll being written by different people isn't making this easier either. Players should also not try to break every possible rule combination and keep the game fun and fair. Unfortunately neither of those will happen for now and RAW vs RAI discussions will never end in the current format. My advice (and that of GW) is to just talk with your players and decide how you guys are gonna play your games.

The solution to the LoN battalions is pretty simple imo. Death isn't a faction to begin with, it's a Grand Alliance. Therefore the battalions don't have a faction listed above them and as per FAQ belong to all factions in the battletome including Soulblight.

The double turn is a big part of what makes AoS so good despites it's simplicity. Without it we'd have another 40k style game where winning by tabling an army through mathhammer is easier then actually scoring points through objectives. The uncertainty of what happens next forces you to make tough decisions instead of autopiloting on track, which makes for a very interesting game. Besides that, the excitement of that one roll is always fun! Unless it gets overtaken by salt I guess.

Do you ever play with objectives or against people with good movement options? Again, review those rules and try to build an actual list with those 4 crawlers and see what happens. There have been plenty of spammable problematic units in the past, keepers being the most recent. Those units are spammed because they lack a clear counter-strategy or weakness. Crawlers aren't one of those units.

Show me this magical list that does all those things please, because I don't see it. All I see are people complaining about ghost stories so far. Try building an actual list with them, it's the cure to many AoS fears in my experience.

It's optional, the greatsword trades in the extra hits on 6s for a +1 on wound rolls so it's more of a side-grade then an upgrade vs the normal swords. In a spear unit the greatswords are good tho. Up to personal preference I'd say.

But they don't. You likely lost because you misplayed, your opponent had the winning strategy and the dicerolls weren't in your favor.

Seems pretty solid once you get in position, but how will you reach the objectives before your opponent blocks you? 9 drops is too much for first turn and with roughly 4-7 RD per battle-round there aren't a lot of buffs to go around. I'm having trouble building a reliable list without giving up some of the goodies, leaning towards 2 battalions to keep the drops low. I'm really curious to see more lists, especially those that can show how OP the army supposedly is cuz I really don't see the issue.

The answer is no, they're not hilariously overpowered. They're pretty good, along the lines of most recent tomes like Mawtribes, Orruks, Cities of Sigmar. Bonereapers have multiple ways to build a competitive list a well as plenty of options for a more friendly approach, so I wouldn't worry about it too much. Currently Slaanesh is the only real outlier in terms of power, maybe Skaven is up there too but with the FAQ supposedly bringing them down a bit we're in for a pretty fair environment. Assuming they don't mess up the next couple of tomes.

That sounds like a great idea! Great colours too. Assuming you order 3000+ dice again, how much would a set of 25 cost me?

It's not just in the charge phase, it's limited by the fact that a unit can only finish a charge move once. Unlike for example the start of a phase, this is a limited window per unit. Same with "After a unit fights for the first time" abilities, they don't stack either. Just because it is a command ability doesn't mean it can be spammed.

I don't get why people automatically assume that the Deathriders Command Ability can be used multiple times. We all know it's not meant to be. A unit only finishes a charge move once, so there is only one window to do it. Same with the existing command abilities that happen after a unit fought for the first time and alike. Please don't force even more and longer FAQs by assuming there are loopholes everywhere, there are plenty of badly written rules already so no need to push the well written ones in there too.

I think it was a good move, especially in combination with games like Warcry also coming with a bunch of scenery. Empty tables are a thing of the past. Faction terrain as part of their Allegiance Abilities works pretty great. The only thing I find somewhat iffy is the scenery table in GHB2019. Allowing someone to bring only Arcane terrain or especially faction specific pieces like Realmgates and Mausoleums is just asking for abuse. It's fun when mixing it up or creating scenarios, but gets old real fast when Steve brings his 4 extra graveyards and 2 arcane stones every game. I think the GHB2019 terrain rules could be better, but as a whole I do think specifying terrain rules for matched play is a good thing. Maybe prevent duplicates or update some warscrolls so generic terrain won't benefit a specific faction.

I don't see why not. They are command abilities and the restrictions regarding command points are part of the Bonereapers allegiance abilities. The way I read it: Ossiarch Bonereapers allegiance abilities prevent you from using regular command points, but instead give you Relentless Discipline points. These can be spent on any command ability on Ossiarch Reaper Warscrolls and the ones provided in their Allegiance Abilities. This includes Arkhan and Nagash since they get the keywords if you put them in. So no GHB2019 or Core Rules command abilities.

In this case yes, a LoN general can revive an allied SUMMONABLE unit. Gravesites can also heal/resurrect allied SUMMONABLE units.

I think loads of people picked it up as a second way to play, it's a new little format to make smaller games more interesting. Around here people are hyped about it and it's being played about as much as regular old 2k. Then again, we also like 1500 or 1250 games here to break up the lists a bit. It allows for a lot more variety in listbuilding.