Beliman Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Yes, it's fake. The Guy that wrote that is in the same patreon with some of my friends. Nothing to take it seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArkanautDadmiral Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 New KO type model with Cursed City and Daughters endless spells to consider Spell in a bottle is a gift that keeps on giving. I hope they don’t reduce it to the generic ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotAWzrd Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) I may have completely imagined this, but I could have sworn someone mentioned a passage about vampires in the KO battle tome? It was in a thread a while back. Edited January 25, 2021 by NotAWzrd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zilberfrid Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 On 23-1-2021 at 5:08 PM, ArkanautDadmiral said: New KO type model with Cursed City Sadly not a female model as it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDD Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) The FAQ is out, and it seems like KO's power is here to stay! Just a bunch of really helpful answers that have put a lot of rule quarrels to rest. Edited January 25, 2021 by GDD Grammar. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fibo Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 On 25/01/2021 at 12:16 PM, zilberfrid said: Sadly not a female model as it seems. Hope it will be a unit usable for AoS too. Not a mini to put on a base like Jakob. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimDork Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 Anyone considered using the Lumineth’s Sanctum of Amyntok as the spell in a bottle choice? For only 30pts, would give a Khemist a bit more durability, -2 to hit, 3+ save. Would also extend the -1 to hit ability bubble from the base of the spell, covering a slightly larger area plus the mortal wound bounce back. Thought it could be very useful in a scenario where heroes hold objectives? Anyone ever tried this? What are your thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boar Posted January 31, 2021 Share Posted January 31, 2021 1 hour ago, GrimDork said: Anyone considered using the Lumineth’s Sanctum of Amyntok as the spell in a bottle choice? For only 30pts, would give a Khemist a bit more durability, -2 to hit, 3+ save. Would also extend the -1 to hit ability bubble from the base of the spell, covering a slightly larger area plus the mortal wound bounce back. Thought it could be very useful in a scenario where heroes hold objectives? Anyone ever tried this? What are your thoughts? For 30 pts and Artifact slot. So it competes directly with other Artifacts you could give out to Heroes. It looks like it would be only worth it in lists with sizable infantry component at first glance, in Barak Thryng maybe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stratigo Posted February 1, 2021 Share Posted February 1, 2021 On 1/31/2021 at 8:30 AM, GrimDork said: Anyone considered using the Lumineth’s Sanctum of Amyntok as the spell in a bottle choice? For only 30pts, would give a Khemist a bit more durability, -2 to hit, 3+ save. Would also extend the -1 to hit ability bubble from the base of the spell, covering a slightly larger area plus the mortal wound bounce back. Thought it could be very useful in a scenario where heroes hold objectives? Anyone ever tried this? What are your thoughts? If you could reliably get it into a position where you are stacking minus 3 to hit on a unit of thunderers in a place where they have targets and are on an objective, I can see it having some play But it also is still unbindable, so you likely can't get actually do this stack in a realistic game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlander86 Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 Garisson/Disembark rules clarification. As I read it, if my guys disembark from a Skyvessel, using the Garrison rules from the Core Rule Book, I can move them out wholly within 6" of the terrain feature/skyvessel with no other conditions such as being 3" away from enemy models etc correct? The 3" within rule only applies for when a skyvessel is destroyed and we need to roll to see what survives and space to deploy. Am I interpreting this correctly? Trying to use Cunning Fleetmaster/Ebuillent Buoyancy Aid to really add 1st turn movement improvements to my Thunderers. I find a blob of 20 of them in Urbaz with a Khemist in tow really annoys enemies and is hard to chew through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boar Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 3 hours ago, Badlander86 said: move them out wholly within 6" of the terrain feature/skyvessel with no other conditions such as being 3" away from enemy models etc correct? No, first all models need to be within 6" of garrison, but not wholly within. Second more then 3" from enemy units apply to leaving garrison. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rahxephon Posted February 8, 2021 Share Posted February 8, 2021 (edited) Garrison rules for leaving are within finish 6" and out of 3" of enemies though? Haha timing. I've never actually seen someone leave a garrison in practice without being wholly within. It doesnt explicitly state it in the rules but you could some pretty stupid congo lines otherwise which i cant imagine would be intended. Wait my bad, after reading that i went back and skimmed it, all models need to be within 6, not unit within. Edited February 8, 2021 by Rahxephon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beliman Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 22 hours ago, Boar said: No, first all models need to be within 6" of garrison, but not wholly within. Second more then 3" from enemy units apply to leaving garrison WOW, I played as wholly within in ALL my games. So, I can deploy all my garrisoned units at 5.9" from my Ship and more than 3"!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boar Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 21 minutes ago, Beliman said: WOW, I played as wholly within in ALL my games. So, I can deploy all my garrisoned units at 5.9" from my Ship and more than 3"!! Yeah I myself only noticed it recently. It also helps when deploying around ship pre-battle as you can put more units in range of garrisoning. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badlander86 Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 I'm still a little confused here. So if say I have a unit of 20 Thunderers to dump out of an Ironclad in ranks of 2 or 3, the last rank can be deployed up to 6" from the base of my Ironclad and the first rank can be extended beyond the 6" as long as the deployment/disembark starts within 6" (not wholly within). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beliman Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 5 hours ago, Badlander86 said: I'm still a little confused here. So if say I have a unit of 20 Thunderers to dump out of an Ironclad in ranks of 2 or 3, the last rank can be deployed up to 6" from the base of my Ironclad and the first rank can be extended beyond the 6" as long as the deployment/disembark starts within 6" (not wholly within). I'm pretty sure that's not legal because all miniatures must be deployed within 6" (ex.: 5.9"), not only the last rank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boar Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 3 hours ago, Beliman said: I'm pretty sure that's not legal because all miniatures must be deployed within 6" (ex.: 5.9"), not only the last rank. This. It's all models/minis not unit that need to be within, but not wholly within 6" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zilberfrid Posted February 10, 2021 Share Posted February 10, 2021 3 hours ago, Beliman said: I'm pretty sure that's not legal because all miniatures must be deployed within 6" (ex.: 5.9"), not only the last rank. 9 hours ago, Badlander86 said: I'm still a little confused here. So if say I have a unit of 20 Thunderers to dump out of an Ironclad in ranks of 2 or 3, the last rank can be deployed up to 6" from the base of my Ironclad and the first rank can be extended beyond the 6" as long as the deployment/disembark starts within 6" (not wholly within). If a nanometer of every base is within 6", it works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeryenn Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 How do you behave against strong melee army that sets up first and tells you to go first? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stratigo Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 4 hours ago, Aeryenn said: How do you behave against strong melee army that sets up first and tells you to go first? Hope they don't double you turn two or you lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snaga Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 Sorry for the question but when do you declare that you are using your aether gold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beliman Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 26 minutes ago, snaga said: Sorry for the question but when do you declare that you are using your aether gold When your unit is selected to shoot, fight or make saves rolls. Same timing as triumphs I think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wah Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 (edited) 10 hours ago, Aeryenn said: How do you behave against strong melee army that sets up first and tells you to go first? KO has a lot of options to alpha strike the opponent and reduce their ability to hurt you back. As a shooting army if they give you first turn you can do a lot of damage with your guns (and spell in a bottle) and not get any damage back. If your build isn't about shooting them to death first then you can take objectivess, screen your valuable ships with arkanauts and let your opponent waste a turn clearing screens. Remember, this is a game of objective control not tabling your opponent. I guess it depends on your army build, but you should have a plan if something doesn't go your way at the start. KO's real ability isn't GUNS GUNS GUNS, there are far better shooting units than ours. The KO super-power is maneuverability. Your ships can go anywhere, anytime. You can lead your opponent to one side of the board and then fly high away to the other side. You choose where the battles will be fought, not them. Edited February 17, 2021 by The Wah 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smillis88 Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 Just getting into KO. Was curious of the best rout to go. Dont have qny models yet and was wondering in the new battleforce box or a start collecting box would be best for the start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random Posted February 18, 2021 Share Posted February 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, Smillis88 said: Just getting into KO. Was curious of the best rout to go. Dont have qny models yet and was wondering in the new battleforce box or a start collecting box would be best for the start. I'm in the same boat as you and went with something else entirely: Thundrik's Profiteers. 5 unique models for 20€ is a good value. Good in the sense that I'm getting a feel for the KO minis as well as being able to paint more interesting models than range minis. But tbh, I'm a collector first and TT gamer second so my priorities are probably different. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.