Kiekeboe Posted July 5, 2021 Share Posted July 5, 2021 Hey all, I wanted to pick your brains on something. I've been seeing some local tournament organizers say "I think the new GHB focuses way too much on Monsters so I'm going to host my tournament with the GHB21 battleplans, but take battle tactics and grand strategies from the core book instead", for example. How would you all feel about this? Personally I'm thinking it's WAY too early to come to that conclusion. It feels to me like these people are saying "My existing army list doesn't use monsters"/"My faction doesn't have a lot of monster options"/"I hate change" and are basically trying to fight the new 3.0 changes. I would love it if tournaments just played the entire GHB21 instead of only picking and choosing which rules fit them. I feel this is just going to get massively confusing if every tournament has a different rule set. Yes the focus is on Monsters right now, and yes you have to re-write your lists, but isn't that a big part of the fun? I'm already looking forward to next years meta shake-up, I wonder what kind of theme we'll be getting then. Is it reasonable to expect tournaments to just stick to the GHB21 package or will we be seeing a lot of tournaments move away from it to create a more generic rule set? I wonder what your takes are. Cheers, 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.