Ointagru

Set up a game with friends (enjoying the company of people you like can improve your mood on its own) and than try to paint miniatures you need for that battle.

I use 3 GW stands for each airship. It doesn't look pretty, but it is stable.

Agreed. As un example, I think that color schemes based on stone could work very well on Bonereapers:

There is some resemblance, indeed. He reminds me also of Athena: She was not only a goddess of wisdom, but also of warfare, particulary of strategy: "Athena represented the disciplined, strategic side of war, in contrast to her brother Ares, the patron of violence, bloodlust, and slaughter—"the raw force of war." ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athena )

Have you ever tried holding your sword with two right arms?

They look a bit like fantasy necrons. As a long time necron player, I dig that esthetic, so I'll probably buy them.

Since the new GHB dropped we have only played ME. It's faster then a 2k points game and more balanced than a classical 1k points game. I particularly like the fact that it is possible to score points both by taking objectives and by outkilling the opponent.

You might find this useful: https://daviseford.com/aos-reminders/

So, instead of asking them to delete the pictures, GW just deleted this whole "quite popular" website and completely erased all evidence of its existence. Sounds convincing...

That's perhaps because people write about it in threads devoted to their armies - there was a post on army lists for ME in "skaventide" thread just yesterday for example.

When you select a unit on the GW webstore, you'll see a "download" option, which will let you dowload the warscroll (stats and rules) for that unit.

Agreed, but their more recent models tend to be bigger and bulkier. The really tiny models were made before they converted to the 3D sculpting (in 2014).

I am using (bare) heads from my space wolves.

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Very nice! I like the gritty and realistic look. I find the purple doesn't sit well with Orcs though. Could you share your recipe for the bases and the skin?

The best and the most lore-friendly way to increase usefulness of our ships would be to allow them to be used as garrisons by Kharadron infantry.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2019/06/14/the-generals-handbook-2019-major-points-changesgw-homepage-post-2/

The list looks strong. However, I'd add a frigate, just because a Kharadron army without a single ship makes me sad.

P3 and Vallejo, because they last longer. Many of my Citadel metalic paints have their pigments separated after some time (and when I mix them, the quality is not the same as before). Also, they dry up faster then Vallejo paints.

There is a third possibility: it could mean that you can re-roll hit rolls, failed or not, of your choosing (in some cases you could try to re-roll a successful roll, for example when a higher result would inflict additional damage or a mortal wound).

1) 1 drop. 2) You have to be within that terrain (in the forest, on the hill, in the ruins etc).

It's a nice list for friendly games, I like the variety of models. If you find it's not strong enough, you could drop the frigate and add 20 more arkanauts (a unit of 30 arkanauts with 9 skyhooks is dangerous when boosted by the khemist).

A true Dwarf doesn't whine, he endures stoically! A true Kharadron uses his/her ingenuity to overcome unfavorable odds!

It has been FAQ'ed - instead of giving one more d6, now it allows you to attempt to unbind one extra spell.

Very unlikely. "In the lore, Fyreslayers are tough. We mean really, really tough – you don’t run around the Mortal Realms clad in little but jewellry and a mohawk without being pretty durable, after all! ! To represent this on the tabletop, ALL of the core infantry of the Fyreslayers have been given an additional Wound on their profile!" KO are not so tough in the lore. Our lore is all about us flying in ships. Hence, I expect KO ships to be buffed, not the infantry.