Arkiham Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 questions for this should be directed HERE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleboda Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 Am I dreaming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted July 7, 2017 Author Share Posted July 7, 2017 Just now, Sleboda said: Am I dreaming? nope, click the link and it should take you to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted July 7, 2017 Author Share Posted July 7, 2017 its a bit stupid... unless this is a admission that the GHB2 isn't in fact anywhere near completion, testing etc. as why release a FAQ when you have announced the next edition already?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuluth Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 Well, at least it'll be useful for clarifying writing on some of the warscrolls, with ambiguous wording. Or just getting a final ruling on something the community has largely agreed upon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Wilson Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 40 minutes ago, Arkiham said: its a bit stupid... unless this is a admission that the GHB2 isn't in fact anywhere near completion, testing etc. as why release a FAQ when you have announced the next edition already?? Why is it stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerrorPenguin Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, Marc Wilson said: Why is it stupid? I think what he means is, the new GHB could throw up more questions, so why do an FAQ now, why not wait until GHB2017 is released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleboda Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 47 minutes ago, Arkiham said: its a bit stupid... unless this is a admission that the GHB2 isn't in fact anywhere near completion, testing etc. as why release a FAQ when you have announced the next edition already?? I don't see GHB2017 as related. 1) GHBs don't/won't contain FAQs, right? 2) Any game changes take a while to vet/test/refine, so this could well be the start of GHB2018 work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BunkhouseBuster Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 5 minutes ago, TerrorPenguin said: I think what he means is, the new GHB could throw up more questions, so why do an FAQ now, why not wait until GHB2017 is released It is possible that the new GHB2 has not been finalized yet, and they are wanting to clarify in the new book any questions regarding wording within the new book, rather than putting them into a separate FAQ document. Basically, why release it in a PDF when you can put it in the actual book? I mean, the image they used does also mention "spotted a mistake you think needs correcting", so this is more than just for gameplay questions, but also regarding typos, poor wording in sentence structure/grammar, or other goofs within the books themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerrorPenguin Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, BunkhouseBuster said: It is possible that the new GHB2 has not been finalized yet, and they are wanting to clarify in the new book any questions regarding wording within the new book, rather than putting them into a separate FAQ document. Basically, why release it in a PDF when you can put it in the actual book? I mean, the image they used does also mention "spotted a mistake you think needs correcting", so this is more than just for gameplay questions, but also regarding typos, poor wording in sentence structure/grammar, or other goofs within the books themselves. It would be great if they clarified some stuff in GHB2, agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted July 7, 2017 Author Share Posted July 7, 2017 43 minutes ago, Marc Wilson said: Why is it stupid? As rule changes in ghb2017 coukd invalidate Alot of things, such as stacking multiple buffs of same thing etc, or all resurrected units cost points, etc etc Different wording could be used so some questions and faq are no longer needed etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Wilson Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 5 minutes ago, Arkiham said: As rule changes in ghb2017 coukd invalidate Alot of things, such as stacking multiple buffs of same thing etc, or all resurrected units cost points, etc etc Different wording could be used so some questions and faq are no longer needed etc I'll take a punt and suggest they know this already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayniac Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 I'd like to see them reverse their silly ruling on the Ring of Immortality (although that might be a moot point come GHB2) seeing as in 40k Roboute Guilliman has a similar ability and they specifically ruled that does NOT cost reinforcement points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotrek Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 4 minutes ago, wayniac said: I'd like to see them reverse their silly ruling on the Ring of Immortality (although that might be a moot point come GHB2) seeing as in 40k Roboute Guilliman has a similar ability and they specifically ruled that does NOT cost reinforcement points. They also specifically ruled that the Phoenix's ability is free around the same time they decided the ring cost points so dont get your hopes up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ageofpaddsmar Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 2 hours ago, wayniac said: I'd like to see them reverse their silly ruling on the Ring of Immortality (although that might be a moot point come GHB2) seeing as in 40k Roboute Guilliman has a similar ability and they specifically ruled that does NOT cost reinforcement points. This is a joke right? Bringing back a vamp lord on zombie dragon for free is ridiculous. Would rather face multiple skyfire units Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleboda Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 This is just a side effect of making all magic items free. It's a design choice. If the ring were 200 points (or whatever) it would be less of an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotrek Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 5 hours ago, ageofpaddsmar said: This is a joke right? Bringing back a vamp lord on zombie dragon for free is ridiculous. Would rather face multiple skyfire units He only comes back with d3 wounds. Even with a chalice of blood (which wont always work depending on when he died and who's turn it was/will be next) you're looking at 2-9 wounds. So best case scenario with max rolls that vamp lord is coming back halfway down his damage chart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azamar Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 13 hours ago, Gotrek said: They also specifically ruled that the Phoenix's ability is free around the same time they decided the ring cost points so dont get your hopes up When did they decide the Phoenix's ability was free? Is that official? I'd love that to be true as I often use one, but I assumed it needed reinforcement points to come back after the ring of death faq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan.Ford Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 Bloodstoker +3" run or charge or both run and charge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan.Ford Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 Changling using Archaon weapon to get the double 6 rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan.Ford Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 Blade of Khorne: all reference to 6's is 6 or more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan.Ford Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 Should skullcrushers have the keyword daemon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted July 8, 2017 Author Share Posted July 8, 2017 @Dan.Ford not here dan. On the facebook page. @Ben Johnson is it you doing them? Will it be exclusive to Facebook? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelmaster Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 It's slightly disappointing how many "questions" are "I don't like AoS please change it", but oh well… Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayniac Posted July 8, 2017 Share Posted July 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, Squirrelmaster said: It's slightly disappointing how many "questions" are "I don't like AoS please change it", but oh well… Same thing happened last time. GW: Give us your questions for AOS! Idiots: Herp derp age of suckmar is awful bring back warhammer fantasy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.