smartazjb0y
-
Posts
190 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Everything posted by smartazjb0y
-
Very much not liking the Warshrine changes as someone who runs a bunch of StD in my Khorne army
- 1,488 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- slaves to darkness
- darkoath
- (and 4 more)
-
Preorders and new warscrolls up on the NZ site!
-
NZ preorders open, SC! description: 😬
-
I think part of it was that this week seemed fairly heavy on preorders across all their ranges so maybe their focus was split.
-
I’m not totally sure when the app updates but the updated warscrolls shouuuuuld be up on the website later today
-
Theoretically that could just mean “models we’ve announced but aren’t released yet”
-
Yep should be out Saturday
-
Are we expecting warscroll changes? And if so, what time do those generally update on the NZ site?
-
Haha I meant more like the AoS factions where the models already exist and it’s just the cards that they need to be played in Warcry.
-
It seems the way going forward is to release new warbands with models, and cards throughout the year, and at the end of the year compile all of that into the annual tome. I kinda would've liked at least one new AoS warband in this year's tome, rather than it mostly being a compilation of all the past cards, but oh well.
-
So Warcry warbands can't be battleline but anything about if they can be marked? Would be awesome bringing them into my Khorne army, and the line from the preview saying you could bring your entire StD force into another monogod army does suggest so but it wouldn't be the first time a preview has a somewhat misleading line
-
Ah yeah I guess I see the distinction there, though I did get caught up on the rules being basically the same since it's just based on Mark of Chaos. Wonder if that then means they're adding the Mark of Chaos trait to the Warcry Warbands then
-
I don't think it's hard to understand why people like the game; a competitive community doesn't arise from people who all enjoy modeling and painting more than the game. AoS 1e had great models, but people generally had a negative reaction to it because of the game aspect. AoS 2e is doing really well and I don't think it's because 2e's models are leaps and bounds above 1e.
-
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something but the end of the article doesn't seem to make much sense. Aren't both those describing the exact same thing? Not sure how "it works the other way around"
-
I like a few of them so definitely gonna go the varied route and having a mashup. They're all pretty different and unique and I actually like that in an army
-
Are you talking about the Warcry core book or the new tome? I thought the whole point of the tome was to replace the cards, especially since the cards are out of print for the AoS factions
-
Might have to get those warscroll cards, hoping they have them for the older StD units too. That and the new SC! box is a good haul for next week
-
Damn so double sprues confirmed! Let’s also hope that price is confirmed, I think it was $65 which is great compared to the normal Warcry Warband being $50 by itself
-
Definitely don't think that's the case at all. AoS is more successful than WHFB and that's not due to old armies. It could easily be relegated for Forge World like Horus Heresy, which definitely is not a case of "AoS is only good because of old armies!"
-
They teased the Hysh army at the end!
-
https://www.warhammer-community.com/2019/11/15/old-world-new-warhammer/ THE OLD WORLD
-
I think rolling dice and flipping through books are very different things
-
Are Dispossessed obsoleted by Cities of Sigmar?
smartazjb0y replied to ANevskyUSA's question in Rules Questions
If it's in the GHB you can still use them, but you're at the mercy of whether or not they're placed in the 2020 GHB -
I don't think you understood me, because that's exactly what I said... "there's no language like in the melee attacks that says "every unit that can attack MUST attack." My point was, the melee attacks specifically has language that says every unit that can attack must attack, but that specific language does not exist for army setup.
-
I think there's nothing that explicitly says you can or cannot do what you're suggesting; there's no language like in the melee attacks that says "every unit that can attack MUST attack." But I'd say it's probably against the spirit of the game and would probably be the type of thing that your opponent would feel is wrong. I'd venture to guess if someone sent in an email to GW they'd clarify that in a FAQ that you can't do what you're suggesting.
