azdimy

Because it s in their battletome

I am hopeful that the latest rumor engine will be part of a new Etheric vortex terrain piece for the deepkin. Rules cover a type of terrain piece where only the shipwreck is a part of so far and it s almost been 2 years. It is time

Do we know how many more reveal video will gw do to conclude what would have been the Adepticon reveal? They are really milking it!

That would be nice to see another lumineth spirit tomorrow. It would make sense that they released the most controversial one first. Although if they have another spirit ready maybe revealing them both at once may have been better to downplay the holy cow reaction from the community

Brace yourself, Seraphon faq is out. Major surprise for me is that they chose to make the bastiladon unrendable until he is bracketed " An unmodified save roll of a 1 always fails. When a save roll is modified by the Rend characteristic of an attack, it can never be modified to less than 1. When a model has a Save characteristic of 1+, modified save rolls of 1 are successfully saved. This means, while the Bastiladon has a Save characteristic of 1+, only unmodified save rolls of 1 will inflict damage regardless of the Rend characteristic of the weapon used for the attack."

That new esthetic is not my cup of tea but I wasn t planning on starting a lumineth army anyway. I feel the battle cow monster is being forced in into the rest of the army and some accessories like those giant horns on the foot troops were added to try to give the army some cohesion without success

Not surprised by some of the negative reactions of the new Aelves reveals considering previous articles including designer commentaries had emphasized on the classic esthetic of the Lumineth for weeks. I think the expectation was set for something renewed similar to the new units already revealed. This reveal today has surprised everyone

Interresting changes. I personnally would like to see subfactions within a stormhost similar to the seraphon battletome. Maybe chamber specific allegiance abilities although I m worried that our force get split into 3 or more but it s not like gw has not done that before

In the recent warscrolls where we cannot blame the evolution of the game, I would say the Ogroid Myrmidon. This model warscroll is so underwhelming for what that monstruous hero should be. His warscroll is weak in every way: Mobility, Damage Output, Survivability, Command Ability, Synergy

Great idea, I do have a lot of those collecting dust

Thanks, I d like to keep the steed of slaanesh as a mount if possible . I need to try fit the sisters of the thorn/wild riders lower body on it but I don t think it will work. Do you have a link where I can see a picture of yours?

I am looking for an alternate sculpt for the hellstrider rider models. Any recommendations? I know some people use deamonettes with whip on them but I want my riders to be humans not deamons but not nearly as muscular as the current model and I hate how the current model legs are spread way beyond the mount it s riding

Moved into a unit of 6 evocators on dracoline once and prevented unit to charge and opponent was pretty pissed off as he did not know their rule but yet played Stormcast? They are not being used enough that s for sure

All I can find is the community article they did after FEC was released and causing havoc. Mu guess it is also in ghb 2019 but I don t own that book https://www.warhammer-community.com/2019/03/21/who-fights-first/

The problem with the exalted seeker chariot, is that it does not fit on the regular chariot base that it comes with it feels like gw forced it in for all the chariots options to save a penny

Heroes on chariot cannot be included in this battalion

These units do their pre game move before you decide who goes first

Finally a dual grand alliance faction. Sons of Behemat will be both Chaos and Destruction. Double the keywords, double the fun! Here is hoping!

Here you go. It s not directly related to my question but if flee means basically slain from battleshock why separating them in this answer? ": Some abilities refer to units that have been ‘destroyed’. What does this mean exactly? A: A unit is considered to be destroyed when the last model from the unit is slain or flees. When measuring the range to a destroyed unit, measure to the position occupied by the last model in the unit to be slain or flee."

Do fleeing models trigger abilities triggering from models being slained? Core rules states that fleeing models "count as slain" Does it mean feeing models are just slain models from battleshock or is there a distinction? Because I ve found at least 1 reference in an faq where gw separate fleeing models from slain models it makes me believe that abilities triggering from slain models do not trigger from fleeing models but I ve found my opponents are split on this. The only two abilities where it seems to matter so far are the fec chalice endless spell and the splitting horrors grom the new pink horror warscroll

Warcry tome of champions 2019 was a prime example of issues it creates when they have no flexibilty with release. Tome was released in december because 2019 but models are finally becoming available for it now

I love a Keeper surrounded by Deamonettes

Good spread, strong OBR showing when new Tzeentch was not allowed

Looks like this was the old Tzeentch battletome

Congrats! Gristlegore is still really strong. Savage strike was properly changed in the ghb errata. I still have nightmare from pre errata games against them