JackStreicher

Agreed

That point in the AoS story made me roll my eyes hard. Whenever s.o. Needs to prove his power that person kills Nagash the ever dying. storywise from what we know about Archaon he shouldn‘t be able to fight a god. And there is a reason he never fought any god face to face (apart from Nagash but you don‘t k ow how much help Archaon had and Nagash didn‘t perish btw)

It‘d be nice if IDK would at least receive one new unit and a boost in one if the next Campaign books.

Archaon still is not a got. I am rather certain the story would be a short one if Archaon would face any god in person. So this won‘t happen. edit: he is just a good tactician with powerful equipment and a multi-Daemon Mount.

Rather easily self made ^^ or you just make an excel sheet.

I won‘t get it ^^ the lack of interesting S2D Subfactions was a gargantuan bummer.

My Mammoth overkilled Alarielle by two recently (Khorne Mark and the General was close)

It‘s called the internet ^^ you‘ll get push backs no matter what.

You might be surprised what smaller studios can put out. Yet don‘t expect a AAA polish ^^

As s.o. who is working in the games industry as developer and 3D Artist I can tell you why and it‘s not due to a lack of demand: RTS games are harder to monetize via microtransactions, since you have to put more work into creating a dlc content than you’d have into creating Skins. Games nowadays are all about microtransactions and therefor investors are less willing to put money into RTS games. Similar arguments have been made for single player role playing games, quote „not profitable“ - They‘ve been proven wrong by CD Project Red‘s incredible success of the witcher 3, which was beyond profitable without scammy cutouts of content or microtransactions. Learnings: These Genres are profitable but you can‘t simply produce 0815 ****** games of the genre while getting a lot of revenue due to microtransactions. They‘re just not the easiest way to make money since you actually have to produce a high quality game in a age where buggy alpha builds of shooter XY have become the standard (thx EA for ruining everything).

We all knew Nurgle was the most potent one (along with Khorne), even after the nerf. Our units shouldn‘t costed like they‘d always be buffed up, especially when the buff is a gamble (Warshrine, spells). And yes Marauders are great, no argument, yet it‘s annoying that knights, warriors and cultists are utterly meh ^^

A red color or a purple-pink might look good!

Sth. Like this except for the blue skin and Cape Color

Nice! Thx =}

Warhammer-Board.de somewhere here iirc. Yet I can‘t seem to find it right now 🤔

I don‘t know the source. It was just mentioned in a German forum

Rumours said sth. About a „hammer thrower Artillery“ Model. That might fit. It probably has different ammunition.

Write a mail to GW‘s customer support. They‘ll send you a new one ASAP. =} I‘ve had entire Sprues missing, it happens.

True, though I hope not, it would make the army feel hollow (pun intended)

It‘s kind of funny though that 3rd party ripoffs have a better quality than FW 🤣

Very old resin models. That is all I am realizing with this army that I don‘t buy most units (though they‘re good) due to their old models. I am currently running lists with mostly new models (except the Warshrine, but that one is fine) ^^

Yet I don‘t think we‘ll get a dragon due to a lack of rumor engine clues 😕

Yup. I also dislike the high elve dragon. They just look stupid with tiny wings.

no. A named character can never get a command trait or artefact.