RedMax

we are waiting for you ! =>

really cool 👍 Time to look at the Apotheosys Anvil to have exclusive warscroll for this exclusive minis!

I guess that you have to deploy within 6" (so all point of the bases completly within 6" of table edge). If objective is 12" of table edge, as said @jamie.white , your deployement will not allow you to be within the 6" of objective, you will be just outside. So except if you can move after (or charge) or have an ability allowing you to make a small move int the objective way, you'll have to wait for your next movement phase to be able to get into the objective (and I guess this is the whole intend of the rule).

XD Best exemple of the day! Sometime we are in the living room with my wife and our cat and I dont really think we could say that we have control on the sofa I agree that it could make the job to have a "objective controll wieght" on behemoths damage table.

@RuneBrush I was wondering if it would be a something easy to implement for the WSD to allow in the text fields to have blod and italic font options? I have to admit that I sarted to be hook by the narative fun part of the warscroll building in the AoA and puting some flavoured text in the warscroll but miss the feature that GW have on his official warscroll to put all fluff part on italic and rule itself as normal text (and sometime keyword in bold) to make warscroll more easy to use. Just wanted to let you know that if you have on day opportunity to add this feature, it would be used for sure!

I read it as @Ghoooouls and @Beliman. For me this does not imply the caracter to be a named one. And to be honest, I will probably create the 2 case. Some Hero I'll create will not be named (and potentially take trait and artefact) and some other may be named (even if I'm prety bad finding cool names). Not really a problem. Just dont be lazy and if you intend to use multiple time same warscroll, dont give it an unique name. With the bitz of my Arkam I've build 2 Vampire lords (Neferata and Mannfred), but instead to name him "Mannfred on foot", which could even be an issue if I would run a "normal" Manfreed (that I dont own today ), I named him: Vampir Lord, Follower of Mannfred (to try to explain why looking so clos to him). You can argu how not inspired this name is , I can't deny, but I dont feel like abusing if you would bring him twice on the table. And as talking about them, here the warscoll (sorry, I still didnt translate them yet):

And here is my Scholar hero! In english (not my native language) so please, excuse (and report) spelling errors! I've made this hero for home brew campaing and a really specific scenario. In the battle this hero will be involved, one army (CoS) have to get control and securing objectives in an old ruined town to find the location of a long time lost temple (that will be the place of the next scenario of the campagne). To reflect that, the CoS army will have to bring the scholar to controlled objective to have him able to investigate for clue to find location of the lost temple. I'll challenge that with a mechanique of "knowledge points" that Scholar score when "investigating" on specific objectif secured by his army. This come on top of regular vitory point (based on objective) making posibility that even if wining the battle, it is possible that army dont find enough clue about the location of the lost tmeple and does not "unlock" next scenario of the campain. In the oposite, battle may be lost by CoS army but having them able to found location of temple anyway! This should force the CoS army to "protect" the scholar at any cost to allow him to do his job! And for thos who want to know why is he on a squar base... this is becaus this is only base that allow him to get into my Celestrial Hurricanum : he obliviously would hate to have to walk

So do I. I really hope this is not a one shot ruleset but to see it a litle expanded and adjusted in next GhB.

We are supposed to have a single point cost for same unit, even in differents alligence. At least it was case so far. For now I would assume this is a typo, and as previous value was 140, I guess correct one is 130pts. Now, let's wait for GW feedback on that.

I've send a 2nd request to confirm that OBR FaQ new point for this 2 units also apply to LoN (I assume yes). Today LoN FaQ and Designers commentary are completly outdated. e.g.: Q: Nagash and Arkhan know the spells that other Wizards know. Can Hexgorger Skulls make them forget the spells?A: Only if there are no other Wizards in range for them to ‘relearn’ the spell from. new warscroll no more allow Nagash to learn any spell making this faq entry completly meanless. I hope a new FaQ will be release for LoN to clarify this points. Anyway, as soon as I got feedback from GW on this points, I'll post it here.

Nice pick, I didn't see that. Anyway, I'll assume this is a typo. All unit always have same price and same warscoll no mater army. We have seen in the past that when an unit go up in point becaus of a specific bonus in an army, it always impact all army (Nagash more expensive due to OBR, Grimghast Reapers going up in point due to usage in LoN impacting also Nighthaunt despit theire poor performance)... So I will assume this is same sort of mistake GW did page 3 same book, saying that Liberator cost 100 when later it is show they now cost 90, and by so assume that Hexawraiths supposed to be 130 (for both LoN and Nighthaunt). I've send a request to GW support to have clarity on this point.

What surprise me more is that this Daemon Prince look... good ! I never bought it because he always look ugly on picture. This is first time I see him looking great! @Dressedspring1 good job man!

cool, thank you @Emmetation. Still on SB topic, do you have any news regarding translations? anything you can share (company name, dates, ...) ?

Would it make more easy if picture would be local on the end use browser, uploaded to server only during pdf rendering and then droped from server? so pdf would be generated with picture but space not stayed consumed on server.

Ok, still in French, but here is my Khorne Trainer with his beast ! Initially just a pretext to re-work the Slaugther brute of Khorne warscroll (warscroll that never was matching what the mini desserve). I didnt have appropriate bits to re-work the mini to make it a single model, so used same trick again (based on SCE balista) to have a single hero unit warscroll based on 2 mini. I have to admit that I've a litle abuse on AoA capability by making this Hero a Priest (where nothing on the mini desserve for this), but this is for a Khorne army... so having in the front line a Khorne priest able to drop Khorne Judgement was too appealing! So in few words: Korne Trainer with his beast: 24 DP / 240 AP. Mortal, 1 hand sword, 1 hand flail, priest, Behemot beast, trampling, wild ferocity

Man, you raised the narative level. Now I have the feeling that I have to restart warscroll I'm working on to match the standard!

Hi, there is an Ancestries "Sylvaneth" in the liste (cost 4 DP) that grant Order, Sylvaneth, Heros keyword. Between SCE and Skink in my version of the book (FR).

Here is my first one. Definitively not "performance optimised". So here is the Cities of Sigmar War priest, a 11 destiny point warscoll for the 2 mini : the Warpriest and his mini gryph-hound. I've used SCE Celestral balista rules template the the 2 mini for 1 warscroll constrain. Sorry, warscroll is in French (didnt have opportunity yet to look at ENG equivalent), but in 2 line: human (4dp), with single hand hammer (1dp), priest (faith shield), minor beast companion (6dp).

Nice! I have to admit that I didn't think about him. I also have him (because that's a goregouse mini) but almost never use it due to his warscroll not beeing really impacting. this look like a nice way to field him!

The General’s Handbook 2020 will be released this weekend andwill bring to us a new tool: The Anvil of Apotheosis. If rules are not (officially) out yet, WC already described that "The Anvil of Apotheosis is a super-flexible, intuitive and simple system that lets you create pretty much any hero you can imagine". System is based on Destiny Point usage that can be translated at the end into a Army point cost for your hero! I see this as a great addition to the game as it fullfill mutiples needs like: - Hand tailoring a hero or NPC for a narrative play (with associated army point cost, not always easy to evaluate when done by yourself) - beeing able to re-field old mini that lose warscroll or points (yes, I'm looking at you Freeguild general on horse) - providing to your heart faction the buff or abability you always know as was the only missing bit that prevent you to rules your local battlefields! - find a use for all that bits you've stored since year that could so well fit together on a hero but no existing warscoll could capture the awesomeness of your creation! Warhammer Community, in their article on the subject, provided a warscroll template as pdf to support the caracter creation. Alternatively (and more convinient to use), we have the Warscroll Designer build by our friend @RuneBrush that allow to fullfill warscroll online (definitively my prefered option). I would really interested to see what others created and for what purpose! If using existing GW mini, for which mini did you build what warscoll (and why/what role expected in your army). If using non GW standard mini (conversion or other brand mini) a picture of the mini and the created warscoll. I also wanted to thank @RuneBrush for his work done on Warscroll Designer and encourage all of you to support him to performe a refresh to support Anvil of Apotheosis, this would be awersome!

Or to bring back officially to batllefield some old hero like Freeguild general on horse or an excelcior warpriest

would be cool honnestly, I would give it a try!

so we need to be looking for "wood dwarfs" ?

and General Handbook is refreshed each year (next one come in 2 weeks) so this one has 3 (and soon 4) version gap. Anyway, as far as I know, fluff in your battletome remain valid, only rules are outdated.

no date yet for translated version.... so... maybe your wallet have time to prepare for that (but I hope not too many time 😜 ) ! I hope all stuff will be available translated (like the just announced first campagne, the GM screen etc etc)!