Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

ManlyMuppet88

Members
  • Content Count

    381
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

239 Celestant-Prime

About ManlyMuppet88

  • Rank
    Dracothian Guard

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don’t disagree but in the end sales is what makes or breaks something. If it sells, GW will continue to support it. If it doesn’t then we can’t expect it to stay around. WHY it sells is another question but my point there is that we don’t have the sales data to know much about that.
  2. Gotta agree with Kramer - without sales data, we don’t really have the info to back this claim. Basing this off personal experiences runs the risk of just getting an echo chamber. I don’t play, so most of the people I know who buy don’t play but that doesn’t mean my experience is typical. As to how can consumers influence GW, the answer is always the same for any company - with your wallet. Social media can be a powerful tool for feedback but at the end of the day, money talks.
  3. Really excited to see what else GW has in store for the Aelves. Loving the nostalgic, classic Elf vibe and I’m ready to dive in. My only question is - where is Tyrion?
  4. I think that’s exactly what a lot of people want. I’d be tempted. And if they did that with Seraphon I’d be more than tempted. That being said, I would expect that they will give the whole thing more of an AOS twist than just re-done versions on WFB.
  5. I’m actually really pleased that KO don’t appear to be getting endless spells - Duardin don’t cast spells! Khorne never should have got them either. I’m not a KO collector though so I can still see how it might sting a little.
  6. Mangler Squigs. Just so much fun. Kinda dreading painting it though.
  7. Not sure how successful that will be if the don’t update the kits for warriors and knights. I’d rather buy more start collecting boxes than use the old static versions. Maybe that’s the point.
  8. And all the “giant stuff” rumours are based on the single use of the word giant in a Warhammer Community article. Not exactly gonna hold my breath on this one. Love for it to be true, but it’s beginning to feel like speculation is starting to be treated as valid rumours.
  9. I just love how much random speculation GW can generate with just a couple of words.
  10. Don’t really have a horse in this race as I never actually had a WHFB army but I’m really hoping there will be at least some cross over possible with AoS models. I understand that my Stormcast won’t be used but I can’t see a reason why my Gloomspite or Blades of Khorne stuff shouldn’t be usefull.
  11. Well I take back my previous statements about movement trays - square trays that hold round bases are going to be a must for all those who rebased their old WHFB armies.
  12. Surely if you were going to do it, it would already be done though right? I think we can be fairly sure that if it is adaptors then they will be more expensive than 3rd party options.
  13. The text implies base adaptors and that definitely feels like the most logical option. GW already released movement trays so I don’t see them releasing more movement trays. It does feel like it’s a few years late though.
  14. Kurnoth are my guess. Just doesn’t really fit anything else in my mind.
  15. Anyone got info on when these might be up for pre-order? Trying to plan my pre-Christmas spending.
×
×
  • Create New...