Jump to content

Kramer

Members
  • Posts

    6,489
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Everything posted by Kramer

  1. Wait that’s you!!! Haha well again love it.
  2. You say fact. But as far as I know that hasn’t been confirmed. so not a fact but speculation. but yeah if that turns into reality it would be such a step back. Like the went, lets bring back the old world. I know then also bring back the old production ways 😂
  3. In the fb group there are several people who have build amazing versions of the board with high walls and raised the platforms etc. One, I can’t find it right now, 3D printed the walls and some scatter terrain. But in the painting he did OSL for every little lamp and lava glow. It looked amazing. edit: found them
  4. It looks so cinematic with your nighthaunt.
  5. Yeah fair point. This was the only one I could find on there. Different source, open this link and in the comments someone shares one that looks slightly different
  6. It worked for the lady space marines I think? (Forgot the name sorry about that)
  7. To the second part I fully expect the same. to the first we can only speculate. But what happened when they did the whole Horus heresy thing? Did I read it right that GW is ‘reclaiming’ forgeworld in some way? could it just be that, forgeworld models but with backing of GW. At least marketing wise.
  8. Well you can play the whole Lumineth army (except Teclis, the hollow suit, and the big cow monsters) in Warcry. And those sylvaneth she's painting all have rules as well. If you buy the Sentinals of Order book. You have the rules, and quests for both. The only thing you really need thenis the core rulebook if you have terrain already. Then you're ready to go. But working through the catacombs book... it's much better value then I thought. But a big investment regardless of value. What I like more about it then Underworlds is that its more freeform in its movement. And therefore closer to a wargame. But those look amazing. Maybe a small lumineth warband then..... #ICaveTooEasy
  9. Do you mean this one? https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Warcry-Warband-Roster.pdf What do you need extra on the sheet for the champions mode btw?
  10. Aint we just soul mates 😂 This was a good reminder. Tomorrow I’m basing them. It’s dumb to stop that close to the finish line. Regarding Warcry. Having so much fun with it. Really enjoy painting different things. My idoneth warband is the brightest and blue’est group of models I ever painted. And already I’m painting my first Orruk test model. Never painted a green skin before. And the gaming is also fun. Had three games now. I’m getting convinced I need to get some OG warbands for pick up games though. So that’s next after the orruk warband. Even painted terrain this month.
  11. Is that the Latin for Boobsnake? never heard of this chaos lord on demonic mount. 🤔
  12. I still doubt this is the primary goal of GW though. They even went on record saying they design the models first, then write fluffy rules and finally they playtest and adjust. how much of that is marketing talk I don’t know. But it fits the end result.
  13. I know Skaven are man-ish like and are beast. but Skaven aren’t the same as beastmen. You know that right?
  14. Im guessing that they will become so as soon as the vampire range is a bit bigger and more distinct. Probably through a white dwarf update.
  15. Happy holidays homies! got it a bit early but now I’m officially allowed to open it.... but I’m ‘stuck’ with the in-laws
  16. It’s more that GW represents it as a complete product instead of a support tool. even with simple stuff like Warcry people argue that things are/aren’t possible because it’s in varanscribe. people drop common sense and trust the system over their own understanding. If the systems were foolproof and more structured that would be okay though. for example is I choose a subfaction all other subfaction artefacts disappear it would help limit my choices and therefore make it impossible to make a mistake.
  17. Because due to lead time we’re still not getting into releases developed in COVID times. So who knows what happened to the original plan. usually, from memory at least, campaign books are released during summer. Wouldn’t surprise me if we were supposed to be a two books in by now. But you might be right. It’s a better argument, than that’s how it works at least
  18. Marketing is a good reason. Showing sigvald builds way more hype, rather than that little icon photo's article.
  19. haha tell me how you the rules GW play by then IMO: They only showed the units because they had to as they were in the GA Chaos book for warcry. That's why we got the little round pictures of them (as they are shown in the warcry 'warscrolls'). Not the full model pictures. I wouldn't be surprised that if they didn't have to do that, they also would not have yet shown Sigvald. Because introducing a new faction with only those little icons would be bad marketing. Rather get the hype going with a full centrepiece instead of the whole range except the centrepiece.
  20. I think Slaanesh will be the release to finish of the broken realms series. so February in my mind will correlate with the next broken realms book and whatever the winged beasty was. so vampire or malerion.
  21. That’s a question mark... although I question most things Nagash so that works
  22. Its mostly that GW had this structure for 40k leading up to an edition shift as well. personally I’m with you. I can’t image aos needing such big changes it warrants an edition change. on the other hand it will inevitably garner a lot of excitement and with that sales. the only I would want from a 3.0 is if they could reverse the power creep. 2+ rerollling saves battleline that redeploys before the game start is just no fun. Just like 1+ unrendable save monsters.
×
×
  • Create New...