Jump to content

Doko

Members
  • Posts

    1,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Doko

  1. His damage per points is horrible after so many nerfs. If a tzenth player lost every model against dragon spam is due to dont use any horror,because it is imposible a full dragon list can kill the 200+ wounds of horrors lists. They are usefull due to movility and tanking,but they are overcosted and fulminators are so much better
  2. When we see something of the datacards on tye box we gonna know for sure if a new bt is coming
  3. Lol skavens in submarines......as dwarf player i find lovely as these littles lovelys furballs try so hard to be friends with us lol Next battlebox skavens submarines vs kharadrons ships haha
  4. As fyreslayer player i can tell you my solution to this: i have other 3 armys,so if gw dont release nothing for fyreslayers i have others 3 armys that i can continue getting new models(one is citys that is almost imposible get every model and i am a collector mainly so i need have one of each unit of the tome) But yes,its sucks that after 7 years fyreslayers only have 2 box of units(3 scrolls of non heroes) and meanwhile i see new releases of other armys as sc,every daemon faction(2 diferent releases for slanesh,each with more new kits that all the fs range) or lumineths getting a second wave and very posible other soon.....
  5. 1-remove random priority and changed to regular turns(as 40k or fantasy) 2-heroes with 5 wounds or less cant be shooted if they are within 3" of a friendly unit 3-mortals wounds removed from almost all,and only spells and breaths of dragons or monsters do mortals 4-objetives are grabed by number of wounds of the models and not by the number of models 5-changed cost of units of the actual fixed cost by 5\10\15 models etc to a cost per model sistem as 40k 6-add options of upgrade per points to units,as a shield to a model for 2 extra points or a pistol for 3 points or a rune of strength for a +1 hit etc 7-a similar sistem of anvil of apottheosis(i think was the name) in each tome that let us give many options to heroes so we can have fun doing our personal hero 8-combat changed to the two first ranks attack(or attack the models with actual rules and models of that unit at 1" of the attacking models too can attack) 9-unleash hell,redeploy......or better every 3.0 new cp removeds 10-save stacking deleted Many changes lol but im sure that i can think of many more haha
  6. +1. This would be the best option that every player prefer,but i guess thats too much for the same company that think that have 20+ diferents models for marine sargeants is rigth.
  7. I gonna speak only about my armys because is better than speak about tomes that i dont play. In general the most important to me is have many options in the army,building my lists is the funniest part to me,so have many diferents options in citys,enhacements,units etc is the most important to me. Also the balance is almost the same in importance,its useless have 100 scrolls if you only can play with 20 because the others are useless. In my opinion i prefer have a perfect internal balance before than external balance. A good example is my sc vs cos. Sc have better external balance because have one competitive build(fulmis,raptors) but have a horrible internal balance where the 80% of units are useless and the 20% are very good. But in other hand we have citys,where his top build is worse than sc per example and so have worde external balance,but the internal balance is very good and almost any unit of the book is at the same level(only behemots are useless and gw seems to know it and is decreasing their cost) In general i call a good book one that gives me many options to buiid my lists and have a good balance(internal and external) as vampires. Then a bad tome is one where you only can play the same list every game and where the balance is bad and only one unit is good as fyreslayers Good example of tomes: Soulbligths:many options and builds and every unit is playable(only black knigths havent any use) City of sigmar: huge options,you can change list for every game and all even if it isnt top,are playable Bad example of tomes: Stormcast: 100 units where 80 are useless and 20 are playables,also the tome is the worst never released,where every enhacement are useless and worse than generics. A tome with 0 ca,boring and with boring new scrolls where lost the 75% of their habilitys. Fyreslayers: a tome with 3!!!! Non hero units and where only one of these units is playable. Also dont have options good in the book and only have one lodge playable and with only one unit.
  8. That list rely on enemy having monsters or the auric are overcosted. Also too much rely on the dragons to get distant objetives. We hope with our new tome we can get some list even close to competitive without the need of use out of fyreslayers units to fill the gaps in our book
  9. And meanwhile city of sigmar have 0......
  10. I would say umbraneth because she is too much similar to actual dok daugthers(slaugthers unit) to be in the same army
  11. Im not saying the item is broken,but isnt fun when the luck can do it so umbalanced. A item with 5++ can be unfun if you roll all 5+ for saves,but that is so much harder than dont get a 1 lol I havent played in this edition but for sure that item with archon was broken 3 years ago when i played with my taus,i usually needed spent as 400+ points to kill a hero of 50? For sure my friend tougth the same everytime that my comander with 4 cib couldnt do nothing vs his archon due to dont get 1 in dices never haha
  12. I hope some glimpse of grombrindall or some new for DWARFS and not stormcast from grugnir.
  13. That isnt fun,40k have(or had? I havent played this edition) some veeeery similar with dark elfs archon that have a invulnerable save of 2 untill he faill one save and then loose it. Some games he saved all the 2000 points firepower of my army because he had luck and never rolled a 1 and was broken and isnt fun.
  14. Easy fix and not overnerfed as was the amulet: 5++ for 6 wounds or less models 6++ for 7 or more wounds. Bum! Fixed the amulet problem and not destroyed as have been
  15. I wish a soup tome,citys have been the most fun tome of all my 5 armys and also the funniest in hobby time due to very diferent units so you dont get burnt(as building 80 same naked dwarfs...) But im pretty sure that we are getting only a fyreslayer tome and with some luck we get one lodge with the 1 of 4 units being dwarfs that would be horrible as fyreslayers havent msu units to spam. Also i dont see problems with soup in lore,if citys could have elfs!!!!!and dwarfs togethers.......every mix is posible then
  16. So is as i said, a no dwarf player asking for female dwarf while actual gw dwarfs players dont want female. Yes the 90% numbers was 100% random but after play 20+ years to mmorpgs(since everquest1) i can say fur sure that female dwarfs have been the least played race,even female gnomes is more popular or female seraphons(iksars in mmos) I really dont get how male dudes play with female toons in mmorpgs but for sure female elfs are very popular with those dudes,but female dwarf isnt played for nobody. So pretty sure the miniatures games gonna be the same,and these gw copys companys create female dwarfs because havent copyrigths
  17. As dwarf lover i hope gw never release a female dwarf. Dwarf must be male,ripped muscles,long beards and with heavy armor,it is posible skip heavy armor if it is a slayer but female is a huge NEVER. And im pretty sure that the 90% dwarfs fans think the same,sure maybe female dwarfs gonna bring new players to the faction,but i dont think any actual dispossesed\fyreslayer\kharadron player want any female dwarf. Plz gw if you are reading this,forget female dwarfs and focus in cavalry and very diferent aestetical units as fyreslayers with heavy armor or magmagolems
  18. Untill it be fixed to 450 wont be playable in competitive,and also need a ward save or some against mortals. See new kragnos scroll or glotkin and then compare it to twin dragons and hurts
  19. Very posible the city of sigmar warband,i think every army got his warband even 2 or 4 somes but only citys hadnt got any. So it is pretty safe say that one of the next must be for citys and this gonna be the dark elf of that band
  20. Btw i read this in the article: You’ll be able to start playing right out of the box, with a 56-page version of the Core Book. so.....i wish be free but with gw we know we gonna pay more than standar 140€ for this box due to this core book? damm i dont want core rules book, there is a reason that i sold the core book of dominion and now pretty sure we gonna get this box at 160€ only due to this corebook when nobody getting the box wants it and gonna have to pay for it
  21. I gonna buy it,i havent runemaster so i can use this heroe as runemaster or as the new heroe and hesrthguards are welcome allways. But of course only if it is the same price that lasts boxes as morathi vs slanesh was,if it is more expensive.....
  22. So fyreslayers continue with 3 units even after 6 years. And tye new heroe is only a runemaster at 80% with diferent weapon and helmet,even the pose is the same lol
  23. I got it rigth,heroe,vulkite and x2 hearthguard lol. The heroe is pretty sad,at the 80% is a runemaster with same pose only diferent weapon and helmet. But i gonna buy it because betwen the loose of battallions and gotrek i havent 2k points now
  24. I wish that image be because we are getting grombindall!!
  25. 100% oposite,i wish be a nurgle book and not a sc. I dont wanna a sc book where every enhaceent is useless and you must use generic of general handbook,where every unit is tye same because they got deleted all his unique habilitys and where the book havent any comand ability. In one word i dont want a simple and boring book as sc,i hope fyreslayers get a tome as nurgle doing our book more complex and hard to play,buffing our strengths and doing bigger our weakness. And yes i agree that is 100% for sure we only gonna get a new hero and thats all
×
×
  • Create New...