Jump to content

Nezzhil

Members
  • Posts

    2,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by Nezzhil

  1. I think that they decided to retire the molds because the sales were poor or the molds were damages and remade them isn't lucrative. Old World is a very long travel, three of four years, stop making money now isn't make any sense for me.
  2. Most of the Mawtribes armies were BCR, and we know they're overcosted. Übercannons, GluttonButcher feast or vanilla mix are the most efficient and competitive.
  3. What do you think about the greenskinz orrkus for the Rogue Idol list? I think they aren't good enough. I know they're cheap with 20 orruks for only 160 points... but the necessity of bodies to generate new Waaaagh points could be a good point for them. In my list I have to spend 270 points more, and I don't know what to do...
  4. I think they're putting sold out all the miniatures that aren't updated when the new battle tome came out.
  5. @Brakkus how it worked last weekend? I have a mental block with my list, I don't know how to spend my last 230 points
  6. You need a Butcher with the spell that "transform" your Rhinox into Monsters... If you play in the Realm of Shadows you need a secondary plan for your Ironblasters
  7. No, Warmaster was a game centered in position and the influence of the heroes. If you play a few games, you could think... OMG, it's Total War: Warhammer "The Tabletop game"...
  8. If I had to place a bet between the rules, I think Old World will be more close to Warmaster than Fantasy... The scale i think will be 28mm, but the rules is another thing
  9. I'm sure that GW isn't going to sell a game without the need to buy new miniatures... Based on that premise I'm sure the armies we'll see are the armies they're thinking to sell well. Chaos, Empire, Vampires, Dwarfs and/or Orcs. I don't think we'll see rules for other armies at the launch.
  10. No, this strategy of flooding with references is crazy, it could mean bankruptcy for the company. GW is a miniature company and if they launch this game it's for we stop looking at proxies from other companies. So they're not going to launch armies without troops for sale.
  11. I think that it's an error to think that we are going to recieve a big number of factions. I think we're going to be lucky if we get four, five or six factions. Other big error is to think that GW is going to make a enormous number of new references (new models, old models and/ir models with square bases)
  12. Read the Lore. The Huskard Stonehorns are officials, meanwhile the others are shamans.
  13. More Destruction no, please... I can't afford more armies. This year was crazy for all the Destruction-boyz like me...
  14. I love your idea, but I don't understand how 'pebbles' could have 3 different save rolls. And... Of course, this is my iteration:
  15. If you run with Rippa's, can you pile in? This is a very good point, because you can hunt small heroes or retreat to pile in again.
  16. Warhammer Weekly rumours: January: Seraphon & BigFaq (delayed from December) February: Kharadron
  17. I will remove one of the battalions and include one firebelly... In the actual meta i think they're beasts
  18. I think is better if you change the spears for stabbas. I prefer the sporesplatta... The loonsmasha are better if they are 10 fanatics
  19. They changed a few of them... If you look at the photos you will notice that some of them are in bigger bases...
  20. The three lists are awful... Thats a shame...
  21. Yeah, the firebelly is the BEST mage of the army... The Fiery or the Billowing Ash are awesome.
  22. What do you think about the Maneaters?
×
×
  • Create New...