Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

HammerOfSigmar

Members
  • Content Count

    405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

129 Celestant-Prime

About HammerOfSigmar

  • Rank
    Dracothian Guard

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. When I first heard this new, I am actually pretty happy because it might end the conflict between AOS players and T9A players around me forever. However, after one day of discussion, I think that things are more than just simply everyone happy. Here is my personal ideas.How it will come out will depend on how GW will support the new WFB, which is called TOW now. If it is just a 30k-style(FW) thing, I think that it won't do harm to AOS. If it is something not FW stuff and it is something that has the same or very familiar set of rules with AOS supporting all fractions in AOS, then at least for me, it doesn't matter a lot it will do harm to AOS or not, since even if everyone turns to TOW, I can just do that too. Although it is very weird to use SCE fighting in the old world if GW supporting this. If it is something with different rule set but not a FW project, then there will be some trouble, and how it turns out depends on how many resource it get. The more resource it gets, the more harm it will do to AOS. First, I don't agree that this will bring the old WFB player to play AOS. In some chat groups discussion just hours ago, I can still sense the hatred of some old WFB player(maybe?I am pretty sure they play T9A) comment likes "AOS is a mistake, maybe GW thinks that it is time to fix this mistake". Besides, for the old WFB player, if they are willing to play AOS, they already did, why wait till now that they can just go to play TOW? Second, for new player with limited money, if TOW and AOS are sold in parallel with similar price. I don't see any advantage AOS have against TOW on attracting new player, many new player might just be attracted to play TOW rather than AOS. For example, TWW attract many new AOS players(at least this is the case around me). The reason is most likely that the old world is so attractive but it is gone so play the alternative, but once the old world is back, why bother to play the alternative? Even current player will probably turn to TOW, I heard such comments already. They say if TOW is not too awful, they will turn to play TOW. Finally, the more dreadful possibility is that GW earns a lot from this TOW and decide to create a parallel timeline or more directly, revert End Time itself. Then, good bye AOS.😞
  2. GW is not releasing the preview for the remaining first founding chapters this week, at least up to Wednesday.....I am afraid we have to wait till September to see any further preview on AOS. Probably we will have just short independent stories in these weeks.
  3. Next week will be the preview of Imperial Fist, Salamander, Iron had and Raven Guard, so probably no AOS news, we might need to wait till next Saturday or Sunday to get some AOS news.
  4. Fly towards the enemy models and then fly back to its original position.
  5. Well, actually, TK, bretonnia and many discontinued models have points and key words in the GHB "Additional pitched battle section", so I think they will probably go there rather than the no-point "legacy" part, which means you can still use them in pitched battle. The only concern is that they might never get updated and appears to be useless in the game, but that's not "invalidating them" from my opinion. If the COS allow Order allies, then for the discontinued units, the situation is not getting worse when compared with the situation before COS came. You will use it as allies for COS or just use the Order Allegeance(that's what people do before the COS is announced, isn't it?)
  6. Up to now, everything seems to be out of stock except the loremaster. I really wonder why so many people just don't buy those ready to be discontinued model before GW decide to discontinue them and wait to the last moment. If there are so many people buying them previously, I don't think GW will discontinue them.
  7. Actually, the wood aelve have much of its infantry and calvary untouched. Only the gladeguard is gone.
  8. I am not sure whether all HQ are gone, but most of the infantry/calvary are still there, only glade guard is gone.
  9. I have made a list: High aevles: loremaster/white lion chariot/archmage/chariots/dragon noble/dragon blades/swordmasters/white lions/dragon lord/archmage on dragon/skycutter Wood aevles: spellweaver/waywatcher/wayfinder/glade guard/waystrider The humans: gunmaster/warrior priest/freeguild archers/volkmar the grim on the war altar of sigmar/freeguild general/witch hunter/warrior priest on warhorse The dispossed: unforged/thunderer/quarreller/warrior/organ gun/cannon The dark aelves: None Well, actually only dispossed and high aevles suffers a lot from this deletion.
  10. It's about official support, TK and bret are still in AOS but they will probably never get updated. Those deleted one probably will be the same.
  11. We do know that some of them are going away forever, but I am not expecting so much going away........😰
  12. Well, according to the core book, shadow aelves looks terrible😂
  13. Are you serious? I don't see how they can auto-win a 6 or 8 objective game against every other fraction.
×
×
  • Create New...