Jump to content

Verengard

Members
  • Posts

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Verengard

  1. I dont see any hate here either, i'm waiting for the release. Different people have different opinions how it should look like. For me tweaking existing scrolls & adding allegiance/battalions is enough. Current unit names are generic enough that you can create lore without name changes. But it's just my opinion, it's up to the creator of the tome.
  2. Im just not sure if the way it's going to happen is a good idea. Fluff - OK ++ Artifacts - OK ++ Alegiance Traits / Buffs - OK ++ Point/existing scrolls balancing - OK++ Changing names of some units - NOK -- whats the point of renaming a Lord to a Marshal, Damsel to Handmaiden, all the knigts... New strange units that don't even have models - NOK -- whats the point? original Bret already have more units than most NEW FANCY AOS armies, realy no need to add more without any models avaiable Demigryphs - ROFL? this is the worst change IMO, freeguild have demigryphs, we have pegasus which are simmilar. If you realy want new monsters why not Hipogryphs, after all the king rides a royal one... Don't treat me as hater, this is just my opinion.
  3. Im happy that Bretonnia is going to get some love in AoS even if its unofficial. But I must say i dont like some changes: - unit name changes - GW already did that why make it again for even more confussion -demi gryphs - why demigryphs, bret have hipogryphs... why even adding new OP cavalry just buff grail knights there are living saints after all... or pegs this is our demigryph counterpart - new units other than those from 5th edition - bretonnia already has a ton of units in comparason to some official AoS factions, whats the point of adding more - my suggestion is to focus on existing warscrolls, point costs , create some some battalions, allegiance, not whole new freaken army with no GW miniature support, if you balance the existing compedium the community might allow it on tournaments. But in current form... sorry mate I see it only for some casual play. And no im no hater, Im a devoted Bret player on round bases but i dont like how this goes.
  4. Question about the Bretonnian Bases. Why do you suggest using 32mm for Damsel & Foot Paladin? The original models are on 20x20, shouldn't it be 25mm? And for Pegasus knights and Fay enchantess. Pegasus come with 40x40bases. Why use 75x46 not 50mm as with Terradon Riders which also came on 40x40 originaly. Especialy that these models are wider than longer. The Fay Enchantress come with 50x50 base. Shouldn't she get something more round than 75x46 ?
×
×
  • Create New...