Played my Beasts of Khorne (using Brass Despoilers) vs a Tyrants of Blood Khorne army last Saturday. I got off Wildfire Taurus from my allied Shaman. Then in turn 2 I went second, so moved my Taurus, and it caused a mortal wound to Skarbrand meaning he would have to fight last in the next combat phase (and we're in my enemy's turn).
So he got the charge off for Skarbrand, and normally he would have to fight last. But the player used his Reapers of Vengeance command ability and struck with his Rage-Thirster first, and then the Reapers command ability is worded the other Bloodthirsters in the battalion strike immediately after, so his Exalted Thirster struck, and then Skarbrand struck. He said that takes precedence over the Taurus effect. Is that correct? Or did I get hoodwinked? It's a tough call, as I can see both sides.
Question
Lord Krungharr
Played my Beasts of Khorne (using Brass Despoilers) vs a Tyrants of Blood Khorne army last Saturday. I got off Wildfire Taurus from my allied Shaman. Then in turn 2 I went second, so moved my Taurus, and it caused a mortal wound to Skarbrand meaning he would have to fight last in the next combat phase (and we're in my enemy's turn).
So he got the charge off for Skarbrand, and normally he would have to fight last. But the player used his Reapers of Vengeance command ability and struck with his Rage-Thirster first, and then the Reapers command ability is worded the other Bloodthirsters in the battalion strike immediately after, so his Exalted Thirster struck, and then Skarbrand struck. He said that takes precedence over the Taurus effect. Is that correct? Or did I get hoodwinked? It's a tough call, as I can see both sides.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.