Nurgle Lores and Tome of Thousend Poxes

[Shaft]

Hi!

In the Maggotkin of Nurgle battletome the artifact "Tome of Thousend Poxes" say that you have a +1 to cast a spell of the "Lore of Nurgle".

Are the specific Warscroll Spell like "Plague Wind" of the Great Unclean One or "Eruptive Infestation" of the Poxbringer excluded by this bonus or they're implicit in the "Lores of Nurgle".

And what about "Foul Regenesis"? It count as part of the Lore of Nurgle?

[EMMachine]

4 hours ago, Shaft said:

Hi!

In the Maggotkin of Nurgle battletome the artifact "Tome of Thousend Poxes" say that you have a +1 to cast a spell of the "Lore of Nurgle".

Are the specific Warscroll Spell like "Plague Wind" of the Great Unclean One or "Eruptive Infestation" of the Poxbringer excluded by this bonus or they're implicit in the "Lores of Nurgle".

And what about "Foul Regenesis"? It count as part of the Lore of Nurgle?

Only the spells on Page 66-67 are definitly Part of the Lore of Nurgle because they are under the title "Lores of Nurgle". After the Warscroll Spells aren't mentioned to be Part of, they don't get the +1.

[Shaft]

2 hours ago, EMMachine said:

Only the spells on Page 66-67 are definitly Part of the Lore of Nurgle because they are under the title "Lores of Nurgle". After the Warscroll Spells aren't mentioned to be Part of, they don't get the +1.

Thank you so much. It's Clear to me about the warscroll spell.

Still unsure about the Foul Regenesis. ?

[EMMachine]

30 minutes ago, Shaft said:

Thank you so much. It's Clear to me about the warscroll spell.

Still unsure about the Foul Regenesis. ?

Foul Regenesis is on Page 66 unter the Title "The Lores of Nurgle", isn't it. If the answer is yes, so its a "Lore of Nurgle" Spell.

If it shouldn't be the case, the Artefact  would have drawn a reference to "Lore of Malignance", "Lore of Virulence" and "Lore of Foulness" instead. Then Foul Regenesis wouldn't be affected because it's not part of those three.

[Shaft]

Thank you so much! ?