michu

It's literally the first photo of the article

Wait, they were sculpted by Colin Dixon?

I would argue that their removal was unnecessary. There are kits that need more help.

It's not about "neatly forming up". It's about "I have no space to do anything other than move forward".

On the contrary - their limited poses added to the swarm feel. There's so many of them that there is little space for individual clanrat.

Here people meet every week for TOW

I wonder if those clanrats will be, "surprisingly", posed in a way that makes them hard to rank up on squares

As usual, this varies between shops and clubs. Here the hype is going strong.

They literally wrote in the article that skaven are next

"We made a mistake. Vanguard Chamber will also be removed."

That is not a Gryph-Charger, it's a big bird.

I'll say this. I did not have an issue with 4 pages of rules during AoS 1.0. But ultimately I prefer AoS 3.0 approach (and TOW approach even more). This return to simplification was completely unnecessary. Especially the simplification of weapons. Some of you say that very often the choice between unit's weapons was an illusion, because one option was clearly better. Maybe. But then GW should make it matter and not just take away that choice completely. Some of you say that it gives you more modelling freedom. And in the past I thought the same. But not anymore. The reason? Because to me it feels like nothing I do matters. I want to make this choices! Ultimately, with both those changes and recent squatting, AoS is (not so slowly) losing things that made me interested in it.

Finishing assembly of my High Elves.

Sacrosanct is not going to be replaced

I have no interest in playing any OPR game

There is a difference between being upset at the decision and burning your army. I'm done with AoS, I am not going to burn what I already have, I just won't buy new stuff (unless to put it on square base).

Well, I'm done with AoS. If I have to choose between "Those old sculpts that made you interested in Warhammer? We're bringing them back!" and "Those not at all old sculpts that made you interested in AoS? They're gone now!", I know what I'm picking.

Makes sense, we have no official Grey, Amber and Jade Wizards

Warsaw - Red Vale

Never liked those markers too. I prefer objectives that are actual objects.

I agree so much. "Control the generic objective" was always the most boring way to play for me.

I agree with GW but only in the "it's better to have a whole new rule instead of replacing a bit of the text in errata" sense. Not with the "pay for errata" sense.

*Press X to doubt*

You don't know how Tzeentch rules will look like in 4th