Bululu

Long time no see, here is the last of the leaders, Durotan, wich will take the role of a champion of a goregruntas unit all conversed from mourfangs and ogors (in his case again from a tyran t), next will be the 4 other goregruntas 2 will go with durotan and another 2 with orgrim

While i doubt we need to get into nerfs just yet, as i said before, the meta is in a very premature state with very little count of events and with the events been small. But in any case, if nerf is needed it would be on the WLV or the spell in the bottle or the zilfin one trick to place the endless, its just a alpha list that could need to be addressed on the rest we are fine

worst momment for gw to do a meta breakdown, with very little tournaments and very small ones due to covid. That stat list is biased as hell, in fact they should forget about a december point adjustment and ghb 2021 as there wont be enough data to collect. They should focus on making aos 3.0 meanwhile.

Ei mate, can we get a new link, it expired. Thanks!

Exactly, and the charge is considered a move so in that scenarios where you capture after a move, you will be able to meet the requeriments, for example consider this. Green is the objective, Blue square is your unit, red square is an enemy unit and little blue squares are your unit miniatures after doing the charge. In 1 of the scenarios, to capture, you must end a movement 3'' of the objective with a battleline unit, as charge and pile in are valid movements for this, you can charge the enemy unit, leaving the first miniature 0.5'' of distance to the red unit, and then the rest of your unit doing a line to the objective. In that situation you will end a movement within 3'' of that objective and capture it. Remember also that pile in is also considered a valid move for this purpose, i will give another example. In this case you have 2 unit but one enemy unit doesnt let you reach the objective, so you charge with both After your first unit combat you destroy the enemy unit, but still cant capture cause you aint at 3'' range, but then as you charged with your unit 2, you can pile in getting into range of the objective and finishing a move within 3'' and capturing it.

Well the faq says the "this count as their movement text thing" means they did not make a move, independent of if they are or arent in the battlefield. So i would say no, you cant capture the the objectives that need to finish a move to be captured i think :(. This and the fly high and drop the batallion arkanauts needs to get faq fixed, its just stupid imo.

Hi mates, i have a question about the iron sky command attack squadron, what is the general concensus about arkanaut leaving the frigate after flying high. As general FAQ flying high is not a move and vessel doesnt count as moved, since the batallion lets you get arkanauts after frigate has moved then you cant do it after fly high. At least its what i read, have i missed something?

Well guys, im starting with kharadron and i usually read all posts from new codex release till now. I just looked at this post and this guy practically nailed the points changes of ghb 2020 seven months earlier and he got blamed and called things like bad player, i dont usually do this kind of things but i though it was a nice idea to show him some respect, i would like to add that im not looking to make any trouble of discussion, im just recognizing a good eye that was treated badly so at least for me ill say GOOD JOB SIR!

Next on the line: Ner'zhul converted from a normal bonesplitter orruk, this one in going to use it as a wardok or an allied fungoid cave shaman.

I guess the warscroll changed with the last battletome, so what now is perfectly clear maybe wasnt back on that time

Thanks mate, ill get you updated, next on the line is nerzul converted from a bonesplitter!

And mounting on my second mawcrusha, no other than Grommash Hellscream

Lets continue with Orgrim Doomhammer mounted on a Garn Wolf, he will lead a converted unit of 3 goregruntas, this was made using an ogor tyrant and a ogor mourfang.

wow this one got hot, thanks for the cover!

i think even after the nerf, mortek guard is one hell of a solid pick

i would say yes, 1 miniature can be within 6'' of the objective and the edge, because the 6 belongs to both places there doesnt exist a space that separes both places, its like if you have a ruler 0 -------|------- 12 the | on the middle is 6'' and within 6 let you touch that | and that thing is also within 6'' of the objective, there is no imaginary space that separes that place. The | spot is both within 6'' of the objective and the edge so it is a valid capture and ambush point for 1 minituare to get in. At least that is my opinion.

change yes, change for something useful not directly removal for basically nothing

still that, should have been rr1 on all saves, not melee ones, wich you already do on mortek

from +1 armor to repeat 1s on saves on MELEE ONLY thx for nothing, i mean a "treat -1 rend as rend - " would be good enough nerf, this is not nerfing this is replace rule with nothing

i would say yes, it counts as slain so that triggers and you can make it come back with 1 wound left, unless faqed,

I cant agree more, the new shooting meta is something i dislike the most, specially combined with teleport and/or 1 drop armies that will shoot you down before you can do anything, or leave you to go second if you have no answer to them, so they might get the double turn to shoot you out even more... I mean long ago the nerfed shooting because they realized something. And now they have gone back to shooting, i dont really know what are they thinking...

Im sorry mate, he doesnt remember exactly, he usually uses vallejo paints and he did a couple of washes with diferent tones until he found what he wanted. Im sorry i cant help more

I agree, in fact that very same scenario is the one i disliked from the new books. So did i dislike the "gain 3 points if you go second or 1 point if you go first" scenario of before. Having the chance of double turn is usually better than going first, except on alpha or ranged meta teams when the enemy has an answer to you

Of course, and again of course it will be updated. I was sugesting in a bit subtle way that maybe the FAQ is not as inminent as we think. Because if it was going to be released in a couple of days then why not wait and post the points and the FAQ altogether. I wasnt telling that the warscroll builder is not useful or that it wont be updated. I use it alot.

nope, wich seems strange, so they will have to release the faq and then change the builder again...