dmorley21

Right, which is why I couched it as it can work with battle tactics. We’ll have to see about this version.

Tyler from Warhammer Weekly released old favorite battleplans updated for 3rd edition called Warcoda. Border War was one of these and was a lot of fun to play. So it can work well with battle tactics.

She’s stepping down in Jan 2025. Selling her shares in stages would be part of this process. I’m not sure there’s really anything more to read into this.

They’re on the app update along with Pyregheists and the new Underworlds stuff.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/wMvIAhXqP4nahWcP.pdf

Points and updates are on the app already.

I mean, that’s on you. It was not worded as some big reveal. We got rules for Darkoath, an article looking at the models, and the EC stuff. All were new looks. Sure, they used the word shindig, but that’s just a fun word.

Your point about SCE is correct - but they did have some broken units. Fulminators and Longstrikes were the broken combo for a while. Actually, they were like $25 IIRC. Fairly reasonable. Enough that I bought some for armies I didn’t play.

The only thing that should make you feel like that is Sacrosanct going away. BoC received one new army model in all of AoS and was telegraphed by TOW news. Warcry stuff was for Warcry - just also got AoS rules. They’ve now made a hard pivot since the first round of Warcry so that units do fit in with their armies.

New FEC errata: https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/M5heIIzZW0qcKTA0.pdf

Yeah mysterious terrain needs an overhaul. I like the double turn. I mainly play in leagues where I have taught people AoS and then try to get to two GTs a year. With two young kids, it’s a lot easier for me to take two weekends for AoS gaming a year as opposed to weekly or bi-weekly game nights. Like others who play a lot, I find taking the double turn is often worse than giving the turn away unless you truly need it.

If this is about me, more or less fair. I used to play WHFB, dabbled in 40k once upon a time, and have looked into TOW. But AoS is the only tabletop game I’ve played regularly in the past 5 years. Like I said - it’s different for different people. I live in a small town in Michigan (US). People I’ve taught AoS to in my small town like the double turn. People in my larger region of West MI are 50/50. People in the state of MI are very pro double turn. I know this because there’s three sizable AoS clubs in the state, and I run into people from those clubs at GTs and RTTs. I’m also part of a Midwest (region in the US) gaming group that mainly plays AoS, Magic, and TOW that loves the double turn. My favorite YouTubers all enjoy the double turn. And I’d agree that most competitive players skip taking the double turn unless it guarantees their win - which is rare. Overall, doesn’t matter. It’s here for at least the next three years. Looking forward to having different things to discuss next week or when the next rumor drops 😂

This just blows my mind. So many people like the double turn. I know there’s people who don’t, but generally it’s very well loved. Several of my friends told Matt as much at Adepticon.

It’s pretty clear on here how so many people enjoy AoS in their own bubbles. My hyper local gaming group of mainly new players in the last year likes the double turn. My region generally is ambivalent about it - some like it, some dislike it. My larger gaming group loves it. At GTs, it’s generally loved. The biggest AoS YouTubers (Season of War, Honest Wargamer, Battleshock Wargaming, Warhammer Weekly) all like it. I chat with some hyper competitive people and they love it.

AFAIK Matt only had a hand in writing the two most recent GHBs. The others were written by the previous team. I don’t like this one’s magic, but do like the battle plans. I loved the last one - the Galletian Champion one.