Jump to content

Xasz

Members
  • Posts

    953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Xasz

  1. New Warscrolls but no new models as far as discord is concerned. (there has been a gigantic leak of warscrolls)
  2. Nice. I'll finally be able to get rid of my 5k Space Wolves
  3. And it got fixed earlier today. Just go into the PlayStore and update.
  4. Valid points, but doesn't matter if the sleeve doesn't perform its main objective at all. Furthermore, it shouldn't be forgotten that sleeves are wear parts and you'll have to replace them in the not so distant future, but I knew what I signed up for regarding extra-sleeves and GW. https://imgur.com/a/SNL2s There might be a chance that I've just had bad luck and I've got two bad packs, not a rare occurrence with some manufacturers. Either way, I'll not buy them again. (Shuffling is smooth tho).
  5. I cannot recommend the GW sleeves. They are too short and too tight. The top of the card either peaks out of the sleeve or is way to close to the entrance. (even if you press the card all the way down) Because of that, the sleeve cannot close itself and dirt can easily enter and/or the card will be damage over time. FFG's or other 3rd party sleeves should work better, are cheaper and you get extra sleeves. Later is another big minus for GW sleeves, there are no spares whatsoever and you'll need them sooner or later.
  6. Isn't it Grizzlemaw? 3 Bloodwarriors + hound seems like a cool warband and not as linear as 3 SCE or 5 Reavers modelwise. The one in the middle/foreground seems to have some cool hook in his right hand but i might be mistaken. (maybe some GET OVER HERE action coming?)
  7. Seems like several posts got deleted, context?
  8. I actually like this a lot. Probably the best way to do it, especially for later expansions. Gives it a 'highlander' feel as well.
  9. No copy limit for cards in your deck seems like a questionable design choice. Maybe they overlooked it in the unboxing vid.
  10. That's a lot sooner than I'd expected, not gonna complain though.
  11. If the base game contains two factions and a lot of cards, it's a somewhat reasonable price.
  12. That's not what I'm getting at. I'd be kinda disappointed if we get something like "starter decks" which are incomplete or don't have the appropriate amount of card X in it. So they force you to buy either another set or a stand alone card pack for 10+ bucks, either once or multiple times, depending on the completeness of the starters. I'm all for addons for existing factions later on (which would be darn cool and would show continued support for the game), but I don't want MtG-like extortion.
  13. I am guessing the same, would be great as you could play it on game night with people that don't have an army themselves. Regarding the cards, I wonder if the decks from the core set are going to have all options for customization or if we have to get several "boosters".
  14. The price tag will be interesting and how many game components you get. A box with two armies? Single army boxes? Full deck?
  15. Interesting. There are so many variables of Shadespire that are still unknown, despite the Adepticon preview. How much deckbuilding? Card limits? Deck size? How much customization? How flexible are the armies/factions? A pool of characters? Can you build your own list? Mix and match? AoS Models -> Shadespire or only Shadepire -> AoS (modelwise) Could be a really cool game, that bridges the gap between tabletop and boardgame. Especially interesting as it could be played competitively in a MtG kind of format.
  16. Great... ...regardless, tomorrow we'll most likely see destruction or chaos. It fits the "cycle", Freeguild n stuff will probably be in between grand alliance previews.
  17. I like your idea more than I should, there is a good chance I'll be forever disappointed when the book drops.
  18. The only thing missing would be a land-like card for keeping track of the blood tithe.
×
×
  • Create New...