Hi all, regarding Sylvaneth treeman types; (I'm intending to be a Sylvaneth player)
Attacks are assigned and dealt with against units, not models. Once all attacks concluded, damage is applied to model/s. So to my reading of the above;
Treeman attacks unit. For the sake of argument, let's say target unit consists of W5 models.
Causes 9 wounds, including wound from MIT.
Opponent gets to apply wounds as they see fit.
Options;
1)
They decide to apply the wound from the MIT first, reducing one model to W4.
Impale triggers, with a target score of 5+. Roll fails, so remaining 8 wounds applied to unit, so kills one enemy and reduces another to W1
2) MIT wound applied last, meaning one model already dead, and a target roll of 2+ for Impale to kill another.
3) Applies MIT wound mid-cycle, meaning possible for target unit to lose two models and wound a third.
All these scenarios are legal and RAI as far as I can see, so I don't think you can argue that it's unfair that opponent has control of effectiveness of Impale.
Have I missed something, or is this how people have been playing it?
Question
BaldoBeardo
Hi all, regarding Sylvaneth treeman types; (I'm intending to be a Sylvaneth player)
Attacks are assigned and dealt with against units, not models. Once all attacks concluded, damage is applied to model/s. So to my reading of the above;
Treeman attacks unit. For the sake of argument, let's say target unit consists of W5 models.
Causes 9 wounds, including wound from MIT.
Opponent gets to apply wounds as they see fit.
Options;
1)
They decide to apply the wound from the MIT first, reducing one model to W4.
Impale triggers, with a target score of 5+. Roll fails, so remaining 8 wounds applied to unit, so kills one enemy and reduces another to W1
2) MIT wound applied last, meaning one model already dead, and a target roll of 2+ for Impale to kill another.
3) Applies MIT wound mid-cycle, meaning possible for target unit to lose two models and wound a third.
All these scenarios are legal and RAI as far as I can see, so I don't think you can argue that it's unfair that opponent has control of effectiveness of Impale.
Have I missed something, or is this how people have been playing it?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.