Jump to content

Edritch

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Edritch

  1. Grand Armada is 1 admiral or the named one, 1 iron sky command, 1 iron sky attack squadron, and 1 grundstok escort wing Iron Sky Command is 0-1 admiral or named admiral, 1 ironclad, 3 heroes (chosen from khemist, naviagtor, or either endrinmaster), 1 arkanaut company, and 1-3 endrinriggers. So the only change is the optional admiral. iron sky attack squadron is 2+ frigates + an arkanaut company per frigate. So slightly different but meaningfully the same. Grundstok escort wing is 2-3 gunhaulers, 1 frigate or 1 ironclad, 1 thunderer unit, and 0-3 units of skywardens. So you need less stuff, can't bring as many thunderers, and can include an ironclad instead.
  2. Grand Armada lets you use the footnote twice. Iron Sky Command lets you ignore battleshock when the units from the battalion are wholly with 18" of the ironclad. Iron Sky Attack Squadron lets the arkanaut company disembark from the Frigates after moving, and they can charge 3d6 that turn. Grundstok Escort Wing lets you pick one enemy unit for the entire battatlion to re-roll 1s to hit.
  3. This book is full of things that need FAQs, and I really wonder about the design choices they made on some things. Thunderer's mortar is 12" range? Wasn't it 36" before? It seems like this unit is honestly just best taken with rifles and slapped inside a skyvessel. Thundrik gives re-rolls on hit rolls, instead of wound rolls, despite the ability having the same name and flavour text? Can you bring an endless spell from another faction? Can arkanaut company inside an Iron Sky Attack Squadron charge if the frigate ran? Can garrisoned units shoot after a run? Can we set up units inside of a skyvessel during deployment? I also hate that the skyvessels have a 10 and 15 model limit basically. It seems like it's beneficial to take an understrength unit of 14 thunderers (or 9 company) so you can fit a hero in there with them. The penalty is too binary, either you're perfectly fine, or your skyvessel is completely crippled. The good: I think the Iron Sky Attack Squadron has a lot of potential. Your frigates can fly high and unload 10 dudes on an objective turn 1. It also solves the problem of arkanaut company having 9" range, since they can disembark within 6" of the skyvessel, so potentially only 3" away from an enemy (and charge 3d6). At a flat 800pts for the minimum, taking this seems great. Then your frigate can just blast stuff while your garbage units screen for it. I think Ironclads are really good too, I just wish they allowed you to have 16 models instead of 15 without penalty. The price of 510 is definitely on purpose, because those 10pts lock you out of a lot of options I would like to have. The Volley Cannon does the most damage, but only has a 18" range. Works out pretty well with thunderers 18" range. Alternatively, the sky cannon is nice with the option for more range, or less range and more damage. The flat 6 damage looks nice, but at one shot it's not as good as the others. 10 thunderers + admiral + navigator seems like a good garrison for it. The new hero is really good. Unlocks balloon battleline and does massive damage. Getting a flat 3 heal (or even 4 with trait I think) is pretty nice, especially since it happens in the hero phase and ships don't want to be at 7+ wounds taken. The bad: Ather-khemists seem bad. Can't use their ability when garrisoned, or on garrisoned units. It's like anti-synergy with the whole army. They can't keep up with balloon boys, and that's the only real situation where you would want to use it. There doesn't seem to be many command abilities you want to use outside of the admiral. The endrinmaster ones are garbage, for example. Lists: I think there will be 2 primary builds. Ships and Balloons (with ships). The balloon build will take the new endrinmaster + a ton of balloons (taken in units of 6) + enough ships to let them hitch rides everywhere. Ship build will use one of the battalions and focus on garrisons inside of a few bigger ships. This one is harder because points don't work out great in this book, IMO. The actual list I'm thinking about is an Iron Sky Attack Squadron (2 frigates + 2x10 Arkanaut, 800pts), an Ironclad with 5 thunders + admiral + navigator inside (510 + 120 + 140 + 100 = 870pts), the new ballioon hero (220pts), and a unit of 3 balloon boys (leaning towards endrinriggers) for 100pts. Comes out to 1,990pts total. Not sure what sky-port. You could do Barak-Zilfin or take the Endrinmaster as general otherwise.
  4. Spirit Blades outperform Dread Falchions in every scenario if you use Precision Aspect, by up to 50% more damage. The only time Falchions do better is when you use Blade-parry Aspect for the defensive buff, and the difference isn't as large as the difference in Precision.
  5. It's a really bad problem GW has. You can tell there is a huge disconnect when you listen to playtesters talk about their experiences. Often times they're given the rules and told the base size + rough height of the models. They playtest not having seen any models, just having heard about them secondhand. The rules are written before the models are even in the prototyping phase.. You can hear about it in the most recent episode of Garagehammer (ep 231) where Alex describes how jarring it was to see the Ossiarch Bonereaper models after having playtested them (they don't like the models, haha).
×
×
  • Create New...