How do you resolve base size mismatch?

[gjnoronh]

I'm working on rebasing my khorne daemons finally.  The impetus to do this is the required round basing for the NOVA open AoS events in August.  

Bloodletters are coming along nicely but i've now started to turn my attention to Flesh Hounds.

The problem is the AoS 2nd ed base chart and the current box packaging are mismatched:

"Flesh Hounds 60 x 35mm" on the new base size chart

https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/age_of_sigmar_core_rules_designers_commentary_base_sizes_en.pdf

 

50mm rounds is what they are currently sold with 

https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Flesh-Hounds-of-Khorne

 

Of course I've purchased a bunch of 50mm rounds but thankfully checked the chart before I started rebasing - which I was planning to do this weekend.

What are the chances the new chart is 'wrong' and they will continue to be on 50mms?  I think the 60 by 35 will be better looking for mine (the older 6th ed metals) and also probably better in game terms in terms of getting models into combat.  Of note I use the same models for 40K when I play (somewhat rarely) 

 

But I want to pick 'the right' base and definitely do not want to ever have to rebase them again.  

Any specific thoughts? Obviously I could go with either, or with the one I like the look of the most.  Just don't want to have the 'wrong' base size downstream.   

 

[Infernalslayer]

Good thing that you didn't begin the rebasing yet.

The FAQ that you posted was the first one.

After emails from players regarding some odd recommended bases the updated the FAQ and Fleshhounds are on 50mm rounds again.

https://whc-cdn.games-workshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/age_of_sigmar_core_rules_designers_commentary_Basesizes_en.pdf

This is the latest one.

 

Cheers!

[gjnoronh]

Yikes thanks heavens!

 

Appreciate you pointing that out.  Admittedly I checked the base size thread here instead of pulling it from the website directly.