Jagged Red Lines

Something I'd love would be if they have both destruction and chaos keywords. It'd be a first for AoS, but I can't see how it would be gamebreaking. In terms of their goals (anarchy and overthrowing law and order) they are aligned with both chaos and destruction. There's also an origin myth that they're descended from a 'gorfather', which they might see in kragnos. Of course, highly doubtful this would happen. If GW had intended kraggy to be used with boc, they'd have included some beasts in there with the mixed destruction army shot.

I'm sure Legions of Nagash will return at some point, when skeletor inevitably gets reborn. Maybe in a Broken Realms style campaign book a year or so into the next edition, which allows you to take any death keyword unit under a new set of allegiance abilities. In a similar vein, I'm wondering if BR: Kragnos has a 'legions of destruction' style list, which would allow you to soup a list from multiple destruction books under his own allegiance abilities. Or if he's purely a mega gargant- type ally that you can just bring into any other destruction army.

I wonder if beasts could get both chaos and destruction keywords in the next edition.

Kragnos HATES hydras

I'm definitely going to make a wolfy soulblight army. Might even put the blood knights on thunderwolves to continue the theme. The vampire centaurs seem utterly mental to me though. The wings are emerging from its waist. The only way that thing is going to fly is if she's got abs of steel. Kragnos is going to be bought and converted into a massive dragon ogor shaggoth. I think its probably the most epic model I've seen so far in AoS

Not a huge fan of wimpy orruks, but then beefy orruks were never really my bag either. Happy for those that are stoked by this though. Personally, I'm hoping we get more information on the "knightly stormcast". For instance, are they on horseback or not? Or are they not stormcast at all but rather order of azyr?

Definitely feel its more to do with how the community has reacted toward him passing on what he found out, than him being coy about revealing too much. When reacting to stuff, I often feel like people forget that the person you're talking about might actually be reading what you've said about them. He might be less willing to put his head above the parapet again, which is honestly a big shame.

I still don't get how kragnos fits into this new greenskin army. He's either leader of destruction soup or like some sort of orruk centaur. Both of which seem weird to me

I don't even care about the rumours. I just love seeing how straight-faced these guys are, like they're reporting on Watergate. Brilliant stuff

Wouldn't be hugely obvious. The fact that there are two days of 40k doesn't mean that one of those days is dedicated to a new edition.

I'm very sceptical that Saturday is 3.0. Otherwise it would say AoS on the calendar for Saturday too. Think its probably something else - Epic 30k or maybe Old World.

Someone on FB did an excellent pencil sketch of the outline. It's definitely some sort of centaur. They went 'full Lumineth'.

Just looks like a reimagined vampire on a nightmare. But the proportions look wrong, the rider looks far too big for the mount.

My initial thoughts when I saw this rumour was that they could add new keywords to existing warscrolls, like infantry, cavalry, artillery, monstrous cavalry etc. That would make the generic battalions in the core book a bit more diverse (I.e. take two infantry, one cavalry and one artillery etc).

Not at all! Just my guesses from various clues we've had over the past few weeks

Something I'm really curious about is the future for duardin. I wonder if they'll get a combined dispossed and fyreslayer battletome. Fyreslayers will go down radically in power if AoS3 rumours are right (i.e. no lotl or save stacking). I imagine they'll be one of the first new battletomes. But I can't really see them getting an expansion to their range, as they're not a hugely popular army (nappy dwarves are a niche interest). We've had a few mentions of Grungni in the broken realms books, and a white haired dwarf in the Belakor book. Makes me wonder if they'll get the Orruk Warclans treatment.

Dont believe a single thing from that list. Here's another, far more likely: Soulblight dragon/centrepiece/Aborash Soulblight direwolves Soulblight heavy infantry/vampire thralls New destruction god - Kragnos AoS 3.0 starter set with more elegant looking, knightly stormcast versus a mixed greenskin army

Yeah! Honest Wargamer speculated it'll be something to do with Epic 40k/HH. They have the titans and flyers already from Titanicus and Aeronautica respectively, would make sense to add infantry and tanks too and make it into a broader game.

Yeah I thought so too. Surely they would say a second day of AoS if it was 3.0. Actually I don't think we'll get a 3.0 announcement at this event. I think Saturday is old world. I think the AoS specific announcements will be soulblight stuff. Kragnos might not fit with that, so the big boy could be revealed later too.

Yeah its honestly pretty weird we haven't seen more gravelords. I feel like there are more kits to come, dire wolves etc. I'm also curious where they fit in with the broken realms releases. Will they be before or after kragnos? I imagine they would be before, as the kragnos story could probably flow in better to aos 3.0. But if that's so, then kragnos model will probably be the very last thing they reveal from that book. Meaning, we've probably got another month or so of speculation over what he might be.

Broken Realms Kragnos looks absolutely jam packed. Kroak, twins, kragnos, now this new sylvaneth thing.

Not kragnos then. Prob sylvaneth or maybe even deepkin.

Is that another weird lumineth helmet?

You know what would boil some p.iss at this point? Even more new slaanesh 😂

If he wanted to just spaff out a load of clickbait rumours to boost his channel, he'd have gone with the line of 'I have a source that has seen the book.' That way, if they're later proven wrong he can blame the source and say he is just reporting what he heard. Instead, he's said that he is the one that has seen the book. He is the source. If what he's said proves to be wrong, his credibility would be directly affected. He's put his reputation on the line here by his choice of words, which to me indicates a level of confidence.