Jump to content

michu

Members
  • Posts

    2,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by michu

  1. 14 minutes ago, Chikout said:

    As I said above, that isn't necessarily true. Every time you choose to summon an endless spell you can't cast a regular spell. If you choose to run an army without priests or wizards, you can't do anything against regular spells but you can destroy endless spells. 

    Honestly, so far I haven't seen anything that would make want to cast ES 

  2. 2 minutes ago, Chikout said:

    He's also not really been involved in the main narrative of either game. It was Grungni that was the mysterious old character in the broken realms book and not Grombindal. Him getting a dedicated novel as the most he's ever had unless I'm forgetting something from fantasy.

    That absolutely was Grombrindal 

    • Like 3
  3. 1 hour ago, Grungnisson said:

    Sure, if you ignore the fact that KoW is square-based, rank-and-file game, which is the opposite of what AoS is supposed to be, there's definitely no reason why GW shouldn't implement a similar design.

    Oh, and aside from the fact that they only just released a different, square-based, rank-and-file game. 

    But other than that, there's absolutely no reason.

    Sorry Gaz, this will be the last thing about the coherency topic from me here.

    I never said that I want for AoS to become r&f game. My response was only to show that you don't have to memorise that table to play KoW. 

  4. 9 hours ago, Luperci said:

    "speeds up the game" followed by an entirely overwhelming and unnecessary chart to memorise

    What is there to memorise? This chart is only important when assembling and putting your minis on trays or multibasing. During the game you can tell what the unit is by looking at it. Their footprints are different enough to make it impossible to mistake them for one another.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, Luperci said:

    It's probably fair to think that a R&H faction won't sell amazingly from their perspective tbf, from what I know, GSC is already one of their least played/popular factions and R&H are very similar to GSC in a lot of ways 

    You underestimate how many GSC kits people buy for kitbashes and Necromunda.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, woolf said:

    BoC lore of "destroying civilisation" kinda fits Destruction GA better than Chaos, and it would allow them to flesh out GA Destruction a bit more - so more balance between GAs 

    No, Destruction is not about "bringing the civilisation and whole reality to a primordial sludge". Destruction is about "destroy the castle, let them rebuild, repeat".

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  7. 15 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:

    I agree TOW has been a success, but without being able to see in the preorders 1/4000 boxes sold (which you can guess with numbered stuff like premium BTs), it is impossible to see.

    Imagine we have a visual of the numbers and the TOW stuff is all sold out 0/200 available, meanwhile, nothing is sold out for AoS but you can see 1000/2000. Is TOW a bigger success? No. It is sold out, yes. But it didn't sell more. I think something like this happened.

    This can be reversed. We don't know if the TOW stock was the same as AoS one, it wouldn't sell out anyway.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...