Jump to content

Gitzdee

Members
  • Posts

    2,648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by Gitzdee

  1. I can easily see dwarfs being the airforce/ engineers of CoS and delfs the navy.
  2. Or could it mean we are getting some kind of mercenaries system for Ogors? Or even weirder, Maneaters ! ! !
  3. Void things? XD Also the second time u say "weird things". Hmm.... Morghur army?
  4. My only problem with Warcry is the lack of support/ updated profiles for newly released models. Just let me use my new shiny toyz. (Or am i missing some info?
  5. Whats actually happening on tga today:
  6. I feel like im in a Warhammer store... What is this foul digital magic...
  7. I think its all much simpler. New models + support= good army sales Almost 10 years of nothing = bad army sales This still makes me worried about all the subfaction made out of only whfb models like Delfs, Dispossesed and Spiderfang. I am starting to worry about even Ogors. The range isnt any older than Bonesplitterz. Ogor Mawtribes only received 2 warbands and a hero, BoC had similar updates. Imho not safe anymore. GW hq doing weird things.
  8. I was beginning to think the same. This also ties in with Bonesplitterz. The removal of whfb minis (and finecast) across all of AoS might go faster than expected.
  9. When GW is so threatened by a post they press "Delete".
  10. I dont mind the limited support of Warcry and Underworlds warbands, it had always been a get them while they are hot item and some of them got a separate release.for AoS i guess because of popular demand but without cards. Most of these have been perfrcr proxy material for existing units and i think it should stay that way. Nobody hurt when they get removed from AoS. But still they are best in their own game systems.
  11. I like the tree thing Sylvaneth has going on. I am actually less a fan of the sprites.
  12. If only they had sold Sons of Velmorn separate. I really dont like any of the boxes with 2 factions. Never have i gotten a box where i needed both halves. Sometimes i really wonder how well some kits sell. Because i could be hyped about something that seems to sell so bad they need to be removed from the game.
  13. U can still choose to build them how u want. Unless u care about how other people build their armies it isnt really a problem.
  14. Different weapon types is kind of what Warcry is all about. Hope it doesnt change that much in that game.
  15. I think it also works in favour of the 3D printing business. Allowing more kinds of minis to be used.
  16. Cause it looks great and not because they have to make them a certain way. It is also creative freedom.
  17. As a hobbyist i love this change, i can model my minis how i want to. I never liked building my models a certain way because of rules. But this might be more of an 40k than a AoS problem. From a gamers perspective this might seem like a step back.
  18. I dont see a reason to cut into Orruk Warclans any further. I dont expect the lore to go any deeper if split. After a new Kruleboyz range + Underworlds and Warcry warbands and a big wave for Ironjawz i dont see many big things happening any time soon. If any Destruction race should get split into a tome i would predict it to be Gitmob that moves into a Glareface Frazzlegitz tome. A Troggoth tome would be the dream, but i think they will stay with Gloomspite Gitz. And even then i would rather see something new join Destruction. My biggest selfish wish is a Spiderfang update. I am kinda amazed to see them stay and Bonesplitterz leave to be honest.
  19. K thanks. I will keep an eye on the 2nd hand market for a discount.
  20. I dont follow killteam releases. Are they going to do a separate Mandrakes release? Want to use them as Tree Revenants.
  21. Yeah i forgot about Drogrukh for a bit. Could be the reason why they chose to do this. I hope the removal of all these old kits results in some awesome new stuff rather sooner than later. Im not a Chaos collector so Chorfs are not for me. I hope Destruction gets something good in return too be it Frazzlegitz, Ogors, Silent People or Drogrukh.
  22. Do we think Bonesplitterz and Beasts of Chaos are getting reworked? Based on the regiments system i think its plausible that we could be getting them back some day as regiments instead of a subfaction. Bonesplitterz could get a hero + 2 or 3 units that can be slotted into either Ironjawz or Kruleboyz. The same could be said for Beasts and can be slotted into any Chaos army. It think it actually fits their lore too. This way GW can still do the micro armies they always wanted without having to commit to a whole army + tome system and years of support that helps with limited warehouse space.
  23. I changed my mind on what i want to buy from GW. I continue to finish my armies that i planned, gathered, build, painted even if GW if putting them into legends. I am a hobbyist first and gamer second. I will just continue building an army that i like, using models that i like. And to be honest i am thinking about buying more Spiderfang before they get removed just because i always wanted to expand them. If they ever get new models, great, i can add more to that army, if not, than i have an army i really like the looks of or i can use legends rules or try a system like OPR. I still like these older models very much and i dont feel like having to buy into the newest shiny toys because GW decides to refresh them and forcing me to buy the 2.0 version of models i basicly already own.
  24. Bonesplitterz and BoC players didnt? There are people that might havd bought a BoC vanguard recently. I remember @KingBrodd starting a beasts army not that long ago. Its not like they havent sold the minis for 10 years and just dropped rules support. I can understand the logic behind removing all whfb models from the AoS range. But i dont agree with how GW is handling things. Its just sticking as much bandages (legacy rules lol) as they can at this pojnt so people dont feel hurt. They are still the ones that cut the armies this late. People will have a strong opinion in this matter. Edit: Also just tell us if ranges will be updated or reimagined if they already know. Its completely different from just removing armies.
  25. This doesnt negate anything i said. They still supported these armies for 3 whole editions before deciding to do this. Sure they can stop selling models if they want, its their company. Nobody has the right to complain right? Dont think that is true at all.
×
×
  • Create New...