Jump to content

webert1

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

webert1's Achievements

Liberator

Liberator (1/10)

12

Reputation

  1. Interesting! I assume you throw the burning head into the cockatrices and seekers for loads of turn 1 depravity.
  2. This is what I plan to run. Ideally I would summon a keeper on turn 2 (with archers and sigvald deep strike generating depravity on turn 1) but I feel like I might be too optimistic. ++ **Pitched Battle GHB 2021** 2,000 (Chaos - Slaanesh) [1,985pts] ++ + Core Battalion + Core Battalion: Battle Regiment + Leader + Be'lakor [360pts] Glutos Orscollion [475pts]: 3. Dark Delusions, Battle Regiment - 1 Commander, General Sigvald, Prince of Slaanesh [265pts]: Battle Regiment - 0-2 Sub-Commander, General + Battleline + Blissbarb Archers [180pts]: 11 Blissbarb Archers, Battle Regiment - 2-5 Troops, High Tempter Blissbarb Archers [180pts]: 11 Blissbarb Archers, Battle Regiment - 2-5 Troops, High Tempter Hellstriders with Hellscourges [135pts]: 5 Hellstriders, Battle Regiment - 2-5 Troops, Hellreaver, Hellstrider Banner Bearer, Hellstrider Icon Bearer, Hornblower + Other + [b]Myrmidesh Painbringers [160pts]: 5 Myrmidesh Painbringers, Battle Regiment - 2-5 Troops, Painmaster Slickblade Seekers [230pts]: 5 Slickblade Seekers, Battle Regiment - 2-5 Troops, Hunter-Seeker [b]+ Scenery +[/b] Fane of Slaanesh + Allegiance + [b]Allegiance[/b] . Allegiance: Slaanesh . . Invaders Host: Lurid Haze + Game Options + Game Type:2000 Points - Battlehost Grand Strategy: Prized Sorcery ++ Total: [1,985pts] ++ Any input would be appreciated.
  3. Hi all, I'm playing against a good Slaves to Darkness player in a league in the next few weeks. It is not an army I've played against before and I suspect archaeon will be there. I plan on bringing be'lakor and glutos for a 2-drop using battle regiment. This way I aim at going first and dark mastering Archie on his first turn. Do you have any cues for me in terms of list building and strategy for this matchup? Is Lurid hazing Sigvald worth it in your opinion? Any help will be appreciated, and I will try to take a few pics and do a little battle report.
  4. Good idea. Last week I decided to attempt conversion of hellstriders with cypher lord riders.
  5. Synessa for the infinite range Pavane. She's much better than she looks at first glance. Hellstriders are basically Slaanesh's chaff. They are cheap (for a slaanesh unit) and can block and protect areas of the board. Damage comes from twinsouls, be'lakor and Synessa.
  6. Yeah it is very much a coin flip. Seems like we need to have as many flips as possible haha. Could infernal enrapturess force Teclis to roll for his auto-casts or does it have no effect since he does not roll?
  7. I just reread the core rules. Unbinding has a range of 30 inches so by positioning Synessa really far you could Pavane him from a long distance (not sure would help but maybe?).
  8. Maybe using Be'lakor can shut Teclis down Teclis for turn 1? Allowing you to break the screens and go for him on turn 2?
  9. Loonboss on mangler squigs are pretty good, especially when you have bounderz around. It's just that you loose on synergy by having a command ability that only works on squigs. Replacing the loonboss for regular mangler squigs would not hit too hard while freeing some points that might allow you to take the loonboss on foot which you could get by also removing something like the cogs. This guy's command ability is just that good if you are running stabbas. Another thing which I know might hurt to hear is that gobbapalooza is a bit underwhelming. By removing them and the cogs you could replace them and get 10 bounderz which would make the loonboss on mangler better. Also you could give squig lure to one of your casters.
  10. Hi Exploder, The main thing I'd say is that you really want the loonboss on foot for the mortal wound command ability. The loonboss on mangler does not bring much to the table without some hoppers/bounders, maybe switch it for a regular mangler?
  11. I think they could have removed the whole loonshrine sub faction thing and allow it to rez any unit. It would have brought some nice flexibility to the army and yet it'd still be bottom tier.
  12. Wow, a nerf of all things... so you can't play Jaws and still bring back your grotz... it seems they actually increased the amount of bingo. I wonder if they even realised they were writing it differently than the way it was before...
  13. I've been thinking about this and I really hope we do get stuff for moonclans in BR:Kragnos. If the rumours are true and 3rd edition puts a cap of -1 on to hit modifiers it would completely remove the synergy of spiderfang shaman and madcap shaman with stabbas. Would be a big blow to all 3. And also to the gobbapalooza because of shroomancer... So hopefully they do have a plan for gitz... I guess we'll see on saturday.
  14. I think they mentioned spiderfang And gloomspite (as if they were 2 different things) so I think we can expect stuff for "both". Gobbapalooza would indeed be nice. I really hope they manage to lower the amount of bingo in the army.
  15. Hi people! Trying to bring some life to this sub. Are you excited about our BR:Kragnos? What would you like to see for the gitz? Simple changes that would greatly improve the faction. Would be nice if GW did with Skragrott what they did with lady Olynder (counting as a general even if she's not the general). On another note, Filip Nica went 4/0/1 at hammertime thunderdome earlier this month with a jaws of Mork list including Grots and troggoths. Pretty exciting!
×
×
  • Create New...