Jump to content

Vomikron

Members
  • Posts

    116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vomikron

  1. 3 hours ago, Aphotic said:

    I've totally ditched AOS for TOW anyway. As far as I'm concerned, AOS was always a placeholder board game masquerading as a war game anyway. My club has played TOW and 40k exclusively since TOW launched. Nobody is touching AOS, haven't seen a game of it played in almost 5 months.

    This is great to hear. I’m glad AoS exists but it just doesn’t scratch my war gaming itch. 40K too for that matter. I’m glad GW is in a position of popularity that they’re able to devote resources to games that are  a little crunchier and niche. Necromunda and TOW are my main focuses at the moment.

    • Like 2
  2. 4 hours ago, novakai said:

    If I had to predict a Gitmob release they probably dive into their Mongolian aesthetic. Iconic units like the wolf chariots and pump wagons variants are probably the bulk of the plastic units being released. From the limited lore we know about Gitmob, we probably have a Gitlord hero at minimum.

    since its been theorized that they sort of the opposite of Gloomspite Gitz and worship the Evil Sunz as sort of the counterpart to Da Bad Moon. Knowing the design teams like having some 40K design cues, they probably homaging stuff from Ork Speed Freaks and White Scars but for Grots lol

    It’s my hope that with the Old World around and older kits becoming available Age of Sigmar can finally be its own thing without relying on nostalgia-bait and WHFB glow up’s.

    • Like 4
  3. 5 minutes ago, Satyrical Sophist said:

    I think it’s real interesting that a lot of people suddenly care super hard about changes to the lore pretty much entirely when it involves anything getting less straight, white and male. The custodes thing has been very handy for finding out which content creators can happily go on the block list. 

    For the record I’m fine with female Custodes. Saying they’re ruining the lore or whatever is laughable considering there’s 50-something Horus Heresy books and Primarchs walking around in 40K. The way it seems to me is that the people who are upset see it as a cynical corporate move, and they just don’t have the sense to frame it in adult terms.

  4. 10 hours ago, Skreech Verminking said:

    I could see there being 1-2 new kits, heroes likey and possible made put of fw resin

    I’m really hoping we’ll see the return of Ghorros Warhoof and Khazrak One-Eye.

    I’m not sure what the life expectancy is of a Beastman but maybe they could show up

  5. 23 hours ago, Ejecutor said:

    Looks like we had an unexpected guest in Warcom! Bretonia is back on the posts list (just to promote the transfers).

    The Heraldry of Bretonnia in the World of Legend - Warhammer Community (warhammer-community.com)

    TOW BretHeraldry Apr17 Transfers

    TOW BretHeraldry Apr17 Group1

    TOW BretHeraldry Apr17 Group2

    I like that they’re fleshing things out a little more but I have to say I really hate these shield designs. The frames are ridiculous. Strikes me as if it were designed by someone who doesn’t look to history for inspiration but video games.

    • Like 2
  6. Does Cathay really make sense though? Seems odd for them to be fighting in the Old World and then all of a sudden disappear completely. I guess you could make the argument that they were much like the real world early Ming dynasty around Zheng He’s time and were jetsetting around the world, and once the later Ming dynasty equivalent took over they destroyed their fleet and became isolationists. Well, I guess I just talked myself into it making sense.

    • Haha 1
  7. 20 minutes ago, Chikout said:

    A 4 year cycle really does feel like the best fix to me. In the future they could have 4 main games; 4Ok, AoS, Old World and Horus Heresy and 4 side games; Warcry, Killteam, Necromunda and Bloodbowl. Put all of those on a 4 year cycle and they still have 2 major releases per year. Then they also have underworlds, middle earth, Legions Imperialis and warhammer quest that they can put out on an irregular schedule. 

    Or, eliminate most of these game and focus solely on wargaming. The amount of synergy they try to force across all of their games is maddening

    • Confused 3
  8. 12 hours ago, MitGas said:

    I like the one rumor talking about moving WarCry closer to Mordheim. That would be really cool, especially if they added some of the rpg elements of Mordheim to it.

    I really hope they save a new Mordheim type game for the Old World.

    • LOVE IT! 1
  9. On 4/6/2024 at 7:42 AM, Double Misfire said:

    Special love for the original metal ungor. They're so miserable and weedy looking in a way the bigger, buffer plastics never managed to quite capture

    c2005usscp0202-00.jpg.1b639cdcdc09f4cd2d40751eaca934fa.jpg

     

    My money's on the 6th ed Pestigor and Khorgor coming back, if only as made to order

    5m7u6nmnurx41.webp.cc37dd3dbab19604e54eed8afda06e7b.webp

    Khorngor_M01.jpg.43127e4583e7a2fdcf1d650ef9cda37d.jpg

    This would be fantastic. The Pestigors have always been such amazingly designed minis. It’s so surprising they never made a comeback.

    • Like 1
  10. 14 minutes ago, Jetlife said:

     

    Hopium I know... but what if each battletome release came with a small regiment. They could even sell them with the new book included. New Hero and two new units......

    That’s pretty much what they do currently. The army boxes come with the battletome, tokens, cards, and what usually becomes the vanguard box. I would like these boxes to be available for longer though that’s for sure.

  11. 22 hours ago, Loyal Son of Khemri said:

    Hoping for plastic “main” kits (troops and heroes) with named characters being Forgeworld quality resin sculpts.

    I’m hoping for this too.
     

    I also wouldn’t be against them reusing troop WHFB units that are still in AoS. this is mostly because I plan on buying a load of Dark Elves soon, but still.

  12. For some reason the Kairic Acolyte box is driving me insane. It doesn’t seem to marry up with the warscroll options at all. 
     

    I want to make two units of 10. Simple enough. The warscroll states that you can either choose Blade and shield or two blades but there’s no option for modeling two blades on each model. Is this some sort of remnant of first edition where the warscroll says, “Each unit fights with a variety of weapons”?

  13. 6 hours ago, elfhead said:

    Loving this discussion about the lore, good points are made in both sides. 
     

    I really really loved the world of WFB, but I do whine it would be fair to point out that the lore didn’t progress much, if at all. There was a lot of backstory but there weren’t many events that really changed anything and the main characters almost never died. 
     

     

    Good point, and I can see why the lore progressing is important to some players. Personally, I feel that WHFB and 40K are better as Settings than they are as evolving narratives. I would prefer it if the lore didn’t progress at all really. We all know that nothing completely earth shattering will happen to any of the factions because they generally have to go ahead unchanged for the sake of the player base. 
     

    There’s a big risk, in my estimation, of lore exhaustion and campaign bloat on the horizon. Broken Realms, Psychic Awakenig, Thondia and the new seasons of war scheme, the War Zones in 40K. It all seems like an endless March toward nothing in particular. I love narrative gameplay but I like to create my own self contained stories and I don’t like them to be reliant on some grander scheme of realm shaping importance. If that makes sense.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  14. A fanatical crusade to civilize the mortal realms is much more narratively interesting then a city of beaten down survivors making their way in the world. There’s no momentum there. The Dawnbringers have a goal and that goes a long way to cement an army’s personality and visual coherency. It will give the faction an influence on the narrative, and hopefully future novels, where they aren’t just a setting where things happen.
     

    • Like 2
  15. 7 hours ago, Malakithe said:

    Well my friend that would require a bit of...transparency...from GW. 

    Now lets all throw our heads back and laugh

    Transparency in this case would risk a lot of blowback considering they probably don’t even know when they’ll have anything released. I’d rather they stick to releasing everything as they are with no defined dates, which has already caused issues for them with the fan base throughout the pandemic.

    i realize they have a roadmap for 40K, but that is their flagship game after all and is understandably their top priority.

    • Like 1
  16. 59 minutes ago, Maogrim said:

    Yeah, what's wrong with Space ****** Übermensch Supersoldiers as the elite of a literally fascist regime being the good guys and justified in their hate crimes against their own people and 'alien races'? 

    I really don't get why this might be problematic and inspire right-wing real world Fascists to identity with their said Ubermensch super fascist faction and recnnect those to more familiar fascist ideologies..

    Oh. Wait. I do. 

    I take your point but is it really Games workshops responsibility? Radicals of all varieties latch on to so many different things and that doesn’t make the original product evil because bad actors decide to adopt it. You can’t police every persons thoughts all over the world. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1
  17. 1 hour ago, mojojojo101 said:

    I think this is in part because of the kind of in universe way they tell their stories but generally I agree with you.

    40k seems to be waaaaay worse for this but Ive seen plenty use the 'satire' of warhammer as a retroactive justification rather than a specific intent, if that makes sense. GW could probably afford to be a bit more explicit some times.

    It used to be a lot more obvious but around 3rd edition 40K they seemed to really lean into the grim darkness and left the satirical humor behind. It also doesn’t help their case that the Space Marines are consistently portrayed as heroes.

    Having said that I don’t think it’s necessary for a company to take a moral or political stand. They obviously have every right to if they so choose but not for a second have I ever felt, and I can’t see how anyone could, that GW created these settings as a way to show a world that they would want to be a reality. It just seems silly that they would need to state that.

    • Like 1
  18. 2 hours ago, The Brotherhood of Necros said:

    Am I late to the party or is that mystery Kruleboyz sculpt one of the Rumour Engines? 

    11656DA7-81DF-4A98-B0B8-793F28E2A904.jpeg

    688BA671-6818-4832-8423-848075F70A2A.png

    Good catch. I really wish we knew a little bit more about this one. I’m not a huge fan of the Kruleboyz but this model really does it for me.

×
×
  • Create New...