Jump to content

Martsb

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Martsb

  1. The living city allows me to play the units I love (Palladors, Drycha and wanderers) from different armies under the same banner ! I could squeezed all the units in a list, the only thing I wanted to add is an endless spell like Lifeswarn... What do you think ? 

    Allegiance: Cities of Sigmar
    - City: Living City

    Leaders
    Battlemage (90)
    - Spell: Lore of Leaves - Cage of Thorns (Living City Wizard)
    - City Role: General's Adjutant (Must be 6 wounds or less)
    Nomad Prince (120)
    - General
    - Trait: Ironoak Artisan
    Lord-Aquilor (180)
    - Artefact: Spear of the Hunt
    Drycha Hamadreth (320)
    - Lore of Leaves: Lifesurge

    Battleline
    20 x Eternal Guard (260)
    - City Role: Honoured Retinue (Must be 5-20 models)
    20 x Sisters of the Watch (320)
    5 x Sisters of the Thorn (130)

    Units
    20 x Shadow Warriors (220)
    6 x Vanguard-Palladors (360)
    - Boltstorm Pistols and Starstrike Javelins

    Total: 2000 / 2000

    All the wanderers units will be on the table T1 and Drycha/Palladors/Aquilors/Shadow Warriors will come later to adapt and strike. 

    • Like 2
    • LOVE IT! 1
  2. I did not find the Herald interesting until my last game against IJ. 20 PB (I have to add 10 more) followed by a Herald with favored poxes is doing great to just glue one or two units in combat. For me PB are juste fine if you don't expect them to kill something. 

    I never consider Tallyband but as I always want that feel of nerver dying PB and Drones, I want to give it a try !

     

  3. What do you think are the most useful units or really cheap combo in low points games (1000 max) ? All my lists feel missing either good tanking or damage output... 

    Maybe the obvious ones :

    - Gutrot and a unit of  (only 5 ?) Blightkings

    -Festus

     

     

  4. 10 hours ago, Primes said:

    Regarding Drones: I reckon they are a staple for our fast mover offensive slot.

    Assuming a List with  30PB and 10 PB as Anvils, Gutrot Deepstriking 10 BK and a Bell GUO and space for one Wizard of Choice (Blades might be a good idea but is pretty unreliable): Would you run one unit of 6 or two units of 3? Also whats your preferred Locus-Hero? I do like the idea of Slimux but am afraid, that he wont be able to keep up.

    List I´m thinking of is:

    Allegiance: Chaos

    Leaders
    Great Unclean One (340)
    - General
    - Bile Blade and Doomsday Bell
    - Trait: Pestilent Breath  OR Grandfahters Blessing?
    - Artefact: The Witherstave
    - Lore of Virulence: Sumptuous Pestilence OR Favored Poxes?
    Gutrot Spume (140)
    Horticulous Slimux (220) OR LOA with Rustfang (No Witherstave?)
    Festus the Leechlord (140) OR a Herald with Favored Poxes?
    - Lore of Malignance: Blades of Putrefaction (Blades worht it? Even when taking 2x3 Drones?)

    Battleline
    30 x Plaguebearers (320)
    10 x Plaguebearers (120)
    10 x Putrid Blightkings (320)

    Units
    3 x Plague Drones (200) OR 6x PD?
    3 x Plague Drones (200)

    Total: 2000 / 2000
    Extra Command Points: 0
    Allies: 0 / 400
    Wounds: 147

    I Like you list and I want to build something like that.

    I think you mix two ideas: a hammer drone and a hammer BK and I think it should be one or the other.  I suggest you to drop 3 PD to add more PB for more board control. 

    I like a lot Horticulus and I want to play him but I feel like a LOA will be more effective. If you test the two I'd like your feedback !

  5. Just now, Martsb said:
    Because right now there isn't. It's a strange rules loophole. Right now, the core rules have a rule that says additional attacks can't generate new additional attacks. Easy enough. Unfortunately, there is also a rule, clarified in the FAQ, that individual warscrolls over rule the core rules. So since the warscroll doesn't have a limit on generating additional attacks and just says - this is what happens, it technically over writes the base warscroll. Again, it's a bit silly and they should fix this (there are others besides the waywatcher), but it's technically the case right now.
     
    I asked him, don't what to think.....
     
     

     

  6. 18 hours ago, Aelfric said:

    Thanks.  I was pretty sure it was there and have always played the rule, just wanted to double-check following the implication on Warhammer Weekly.  There's no  wording on the Waywatcher warscroll that overrides the rule, so I'm not sure how people can interpret it any other way.  Confusion over, back to normality. 

    Because right now there isn't. It's a strange rules loophole. Right now, the core rules have a rule that says additional attacks can't generate new additional attacks. Easy enough. Unfortunately, there is also a rule, clarified in the FAQ, that individual warscrolls over rule the core rules. So since the warscroll doesn't have a limit on generating additional attacks and just says - this is what happens, it technically over writes the base warscroll. Again, it's a bit silly and they should fix this (there are others besides the waywatcher), but it's technically the case right now.
     
    I asked him, don't what to think.....
     
     
     
    Masquer les réponses
     
×
×
  • Create New...