Is there any such thing as 'rule precedence' in Age of Sigmar? Many games I know have some kind of statement that, if multiple rules seem clashing, specific rules count over general rules. I was wondering is Age Of Sigmar has these kinds of rules.
I am asking because I've noticed the GHB, Warscrolls & allegiance abilities clashing. For instance when talking about sylvaneth & wyldwood placement rules: GHB has different rules from the wyldwood warscroll which has different rules from the unit warscrolls such as TLA and Alarielle who can place wyldwoods.
If there is such a rule, that would help a lot with the ambiguity. I could image something like Warscrolls (count over) > allegiance > GHB > Core Rules.
Apart from making sense, I'd say that the AoS rules would bevery problematicbecause otherwise we'd have no clear reason why warscrolls which, for instance, state that a creature can Run & Still shoot, or Run & still charge, can actually still do that if the core rules state that you can't. and, of course, we reasonably assume that warscrollscando that if they state so even if it conflicts with general rules. In that sense, I can imagine warscrolls, with for instance run & charge but also sylvaneth wyldwood placement, take precedence over the more general rules. What do you guys think?
Question
Abstract_duck
Is there any such thing as 'rule precedence' in Age of Sigmar? Many games I know have some kind of statement that, if multiple rules seem clashing, specific rules count over general rules. I was wondering is Age Of Sigmar has these kinds of rules.
I am asking because I've noticed the GHB, Warscrolls & allegiance abilities clashing. For instance when talking about sylvaneth & wyldwood placement rules: GHB has different rules from the wyldwood warscroll which has different rules from the unit warscrolls such as TLA and Alarielle who can place wyldwoods.
If there is such a rule, that would help a lot with the ambiguity. I could image something like Warscrolls (count over) > allegiance > GHB > Core Rules.
Apart from making sense, I'd say that the AoS rules would be very problematic because otherwise we'd have no clear reason why warscrolls which, for instance, state that a creature can Run & Still shoot, or Run & still charge, can actually still do that if the core rules state that you can't. and, of course, we reasonably assume that warscrolls can do that if they state so even if it conflicts with general rules. In that sense, I can imagine warscrolls, with for instance run & charge but also sylvaneth wyldwood placement, take precedence over the more general rules. What do you guys think?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.