Jump to content

pseudonyme

Members
  • Posts

    545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pseudonyme

  1. 10 hours ago, GeneralZero said:

    Well, regarding the 1000 points, I can give an idea that work pretty nicely here in France for 40K. For 40K, it is called the 169. It it the point limit of single unit/datasheet. You can't play a unit more expensive than that or a hero more than 169. (And eventually can't play it more than once but there are some exception like battleline).

    Well, in AoS, you could play such a game: X point limit and Y max unit/warscroll points, meaning  big units or heros, out, oversised units, out, spam, out, etc... (for example X=1000, Y=200)

    Will give you games back to basics, fast and ....fun.

    Always wondered what that meant on my local GW 40k events.

    For AoS I could imagine a limitation like: a unit cannot be more than twice its minimum size / more than 20 wounds / more than X (300, 350, 400) points

  2. Nah, no worries, I guess only people with knowledge of everything can answer it properly. This system is not made for optional answers or "dunno", the concept is exptessing your self on every proposa (my Death poll was à good example I think).

     

    Concerning external balance (assuming that every payer played at least one of each battletome faction at least once) , what do you think is best, that I launch à majority judgement vote before the GHB release or à couple of month after ?

     

    I really don't like those tier lists I saw, and would prefer the feel of the community. Comparing the feeling to the tournament stats could be surprising.

     

  3. 16 minutes ago, Kramer said:

    And even then... if I never play Seraphon who am I to judge if the balance is off? I think it could still work but you make judging every faction optional and you only use the data of the factions that get X amount of votes. 

    Yeah Yeah, got it 😅

    12 minutes ago, Dead Scribe said:

    My faction is weak or not that bad.  Other ones are much worse.

    ;)

    Beyond the obvious difficulty to vite because you should know every faction, it was not à poll on power ranking, but the internal balance of an army within itself.

    Created this poll because I got annoyed by yesterday tier lists on Twitter 😇

  4. It is the same runes than the base of the eldar Death jester

    Friend of mine is saying that it could be exodites(?), eldars mounting dinosaurs, and that the reptilian rumour engine could be also that

    • Like 4
    • LOVE IT! 1
  5. Dear fellow tacticians,

    I created a preferential vote poll concerning the internal balance of AoS armies.

    What I mean by internal balance is the balance of options within an army is:

    - balance between allegiance rules

    - balance between units

    - diversity of lists - diversity of gameplays

    - any other criteria you can think of 

     

    Disclaimer: this is not a poll about the efficiency of each armies in the meta. 

    So... Beyond telling you that I will share the results in 48h, that's pretty much it 

     

    Here's the poll:

    https://jugementmajoritaire.net/vote/551bbef999e7d579d9f7c9df5970a002e92ec4e20d5

     

     If you want to share the poll on Twitter

     

    Previous majority judgement vote on the upcoming Death battletome wishlist

     

     

  6.  

    2 hours ago, Honk said:

    A lot of people really really like them moaning ghostly things, I personally and kinda lonely just don’t like them (though luck for me I guess).

    what I really meant with that statement is...prepare to pour salt over uneducated nonesense... that they are just mediocre at best in the power balance against other factions and most of my resentment stems from their units being better in my LoN than in their original faction.

    Chainrasps as battleline seem to be so much better in LoN as well as the grimghast and the stalkers. That just baffles and bugs me to no end, fills me with resentment, hate and anger. 

    (being the only Servant of Nagash in my surroundings, as I said bring the salt for my statements)

     

    maybe I‘m just wrong in all my assumptions XD 

    but that is why I think GW botched the NH release

     

    Must confess that I thought you were talking about their sculpts.

    From a french YouTube channel review of the Legion of grief, I agree that it is a pity that « pro » thinks that it invalidates the Nighthaunt battletome. I don’t know how GW could fix that issue in the next GHB.

     

    42 minutes ago, Skreech Verminking said:

    I’m a bit confused, how exactly do you vote at this website??

    The vote lasted 48h. For each proposal, you have to select a judgement from « « Excellent » to « No ****** way!!!! ».

    Would you guys be interested in a preferential vote on battletome internal balance and another on external balance? Or any topic in fact.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...