Jump to content

EntMan

Members
  • Posts

    1,714
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Posts posted by EntMan

  1. 44 minutes ago, Grungnisson said:

    I could easily see GW winding down shooting in the game in general. Seeing the changes to the rules so far, previous removal of a lot of firepower from Cities and now from Stormcast, I think the aim is to make ranged comat less common and less impactful. Not eradicated, but limited across the board and more tightly controlled.

    We know from leaked sprues that Skaven are getting at least 2 new ranged shooty units. It'd be weird if a horde army got the new shooty stuff if it really is being limited and scaled back overall.

  2. 34 minutes ago, Neil Arthur Hotep said:

    It's an interesting idea, but what would a faction being cross alliance even mean at this point? Just ally choices? It's not like GAs even have mechanics attached right now.

    Yeah, what even are Grand Alliances now anyway?

    Apart from categories on the webstore and an indication of which Mega Gargant you can have in your army?

  3. 2 minutes ago, Luperci said:

    the scale is definitely something they struggle with, I think it'd be ok if they didn't always try to do these grand narratives that include every faction. For example over a quarter they could release a few army books and a campaign book that included all of those factions. Instead of having a crazy amount of books over the last 6 months of an edition, spread them out a bit more so the narrative feels more continuous?

    Is this related to "Is AoS a setting or a story"?

    During an edition it's a setting so not a lot can change. Then in the run up to a new edition they can/need to have loads of narrative to set up the updated setting for the new edition.

    Maybe? Who knows? I'm just waffling.

  4. 7 hours ago, Gitzdee said:

    What about daemons like pink horrors or the coloured gods? GW wants to move away from that too? We are talking about marines etc but isnt this the same problem? 

    I think it would be great to not have daemons locked into a scheme. I know it isnt a rule, but ive never seen anyone move away from the GW scheme.

    Pink Horrors and Blue Horrors I think are pretty different sizes and on different sized bases, I think that's how they are told apart rather than necessarily the colour. Despite the name.

  5. 1 hour ago, Pizzaprez said:

    However, I dislike whenever GW puts a "if you want to use X rules for Your Dudes, you gotta paint them 'right'" rule in place

    Based on responses to a comment I made the other day, I think this was only ever a thing briefly in AoS once and the colour scheme specific rules sillyness is much more a 40k thing.

  6. 16 minutes ago, cyrus said:

    So we call "ruinators" for the new model monday today ! ;)

    ngcb3

    What it'd love is a reveal of a new Stormcast war machine/artillery model now the Ballista is leaving the range.

    But that's just me wishing 

    • Like 3
  7. 1 hour ago, Big Kim Woof-Woof said:

    Something I always thought was a bit odd about the Chaos Dwarfs is that they're not very chaotic. They were all about industry and organisation. I wonder if that will change... 

    Lawful Evil for sure.

    • Like 1
  8. 1 minute ago, MitGas said:

    Ironically enough, the first TT force that had very racially varied units is the Imperium in 40k, despite being the most xenophobic bunch out there with Ogryns, Ratlings and the like (they justified it with these being meta-humans, apparently that's good enough, despite burning you at the stake if you got a 6th digit for fear of it being a Chaos mutation....lulz).

    And also squats and beastmen in the early days.

    • Thanks 1
  9. 1 minute ago, Tonhel said:

    I painted 3 steelhelms for Misthavn, but came to the conlusion that I didn't really like painting the dark blue/greyish colours and that the playstyle wasn't my thing. I jumped to Lethis and than I jumped to Hammerhal Aqsha. But those three painted Misthavn Steelhelms just jumped with me. Even if the colours weren't really correct, I just thought the more steelhelms I paint in the colours of the free city I played, the more they would blend in.

    Well don't you know about Sigmar's cross cities Steelhelm exchange program? To foster cooperation across the realms.

    • Haha 1
  10. 1 minute ago, Clan's Cynic said:

    I think it's more of a 40k thing, where some (but far from all) tournaments wouldn't allow you to say... run Iron Hands if your army was painted as Ultramarines,

    I mean, that seems pretty harsh to me. A generalisation for sure, but AoS folk seem way more chilled than 40K-ers.

  11. 10 minutes ago, KingBrodd said:

    I just cant comprehend this sudden decision that Ogors may be on the chopping block?

    Now we have certainty about Beasts and Splitters we TGAers need a faction to fret about rumoured squatting.

    image.png.ea2962d56d2c9101ec489b49ed05b38b.png

    10 minutes ago, KingBrodd said:

    *Sons of Behemat can be taken by any Alliance.

    We don't know what allies rules will be in 4oS yet. Now Megas aren't new and GW not pushing for everyone to buy them they might not be available to everyone anymore.

    • Haha 3
  12. 4 hours ago, Tonhel said:

    The old metal is smaller, but you as a player can choose which treeman you use. The AoS one, or the old metal one. Both base sizes are supported in the TOW rules and both units have basically the same name.

    I've a feeling some might turn up as Hunters in my Sylvaneth. Price dependent.

  13. 2 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:

    Ha! Do you remember when we were talking about the video and I said something long was a sword? Here they are. Weird swords to me. Just thinking about them as tiny spears would feel... a bit ridiculous.

    They definitely hacking, stabbing, jabbing, cutting things!

  14. 3 hours ago, Magnusaur said:

    Just to comment on the Treeman thing, The Old World books use the old sculpts in Wood Elf displays: image.png.d9df60033f30f9563f3df564f5749bab.pngimage.png.98d9d1ac96db376dee38a76c3eedbc92.png

    They do look very different.

    And I can't fully tell but size wise they look a fair bit smaller. Maybe more similar to Kurnoth Hunters than the he newer Treelord/men?

  15. 2 minutes ago, Vasshpit said:

    A quick search shows a lot of different flags like this including "United Farm Workers" of America. 

    Just saying. The worst conclusion isn't always the best to jump to first. 😉

    Hopefully we can successfully apply Hanlon's Razor here.

  16. 4 minutes ago, Snarff said:

    Agreed in that they're a tad too ordinary, I hope to see something more exceptional in the rest of the range. For these as the most basic foot troops it is alright, but I really want to see something that makes Skaven feel like the Realm-Destroying rats they are in lore. I'm sure they'll do something like that, Skaven technology has to have advanced with all the possibilities opened up in the Mortal Realms and all the time they've spent hiding before the Vermindoom.

    The Warlock Bombardier is still my favourite Skaven Sculpt by far and a great way to start the AoSification of Skaven, you can see how much fun he's having shooting rockets at his victims. I'm hoping some other new sculpts match his energy.

    image.jpeg.12e2f50c2779062dfdea86e11b721d2d.jpeg

    Didn't the WarCom short story hint at some kind of warpstone powered mech or power-armour? 😍

  17. 39 minutes ago, The Lost Sigmarite said:

    Quite interesting flag, I don't know if the 'eavy painters painted it the way it is intentionally, but a geometric shape inside a white circle in a red flag ? Cmon they must have known what they were referencing. 

    Really hope it's an unintentional coincidence.

×
×
  • Create New...