baiardo
-
Posts
320 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by baiardo
-
-
@GnomeChomskyhey, if you use warscroll builder is much better to read the lists and always updated.
-
1
-
-
When new grots were released?There is a site where I can see first time actual models of gloomspite were being released?(the year).
-
13 hours ago, Beliman said:
I think that both dragons are good. A bit caroon-ish but still, really good overall. Of course, if your thing is realism, this dragons will not be your cup of tee.
Here are some GW/Citadel dragons heads (I ignored some of the old ones like Galrauch or Engrim Van Hortsmann):
High Elf and Dark Elf dragons are simply the best!
-
1
-
-
What are you playing in 3.0?
-
2 minutes ago, Aeryenn said:
These mems, jokes really spoil all the joy of new dragons...
It's only a miniature, you could enjoy it anyway if you like it!
-
1
-
-
Drakes in SCE have always something derpy but it's easy to love the faction...
-
1 minute ago, Feii said:
how tall is the structure on the left?
With the wings I bet they are around 16-20cm
-
14 minutes ago, Sigmarusvult said:
I don't expect it to be all entirely true but the 1KSons vs Grey Knight box is a real thing now.
I think they’re true. Obr archers could be a thing since we saw the model in direchasm. Also gloomspite vs beast of chaos box was confirmed by grimdark live.
-
1 minute ago, Obeisance said:
Are Kainan's Reapers battleline?
Probably not, right.
they aren't
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, Enoby said:
I do think Archaon really needs to be pointed per army he's available in. In fact, I'd go as far to say it's a large design mistake to not - it's known they point models in relation to allegiance ability, so the fact Archaon is the same cost in Tzeentch and Slaves to Darkness (and other gods) makes no sense from a balance perspective when he benefits very differently from each one.
More than that, it would be very unfair if Archaon increased in points by a large amount because of the interaction with Tzeentch - fine for Tzeentch, but unfair to the other armies that can use him but not abuse him.
In fact, I'd go as fair to say that all Slaves to Darkness/Beasts of Chaos units should have individual points based on the army they end up in. Would it take more time? Undoubtedly yes. But I don't believe GW can balance that many units over that many totally different allegiance abilities covered by the same points cost.
Could be a good solution, for my personal experience I would forbid to archaon to be played in tzeentch, even at 970pt. the problem remain.
The list above lose more likely to a mirror match than against others factions of this game.
-
1
-
-
Playing against tzeentch summon guild + archaon + belakor + horror is really unpleasant, no matter what I play, archaon will have unconditional support to kill everyone on the table.
Archaon could be ok in StD but in tzeench is a problem because I simply can’t win a game.
-
I would like to know if it will be possible to play some aos models like vampire lord or some chaos or zombie units or this is already excluded?
-
23 minutes ago, r0olz said:
So ossiarch lost immune to battle shock but also can't give inspiring presence, so we have no way of preventing an entire unit of battleline from fleeing I'd they are hit hard, right? What the heck....
What?no, where you see that?
-
Bone-tithe nexus can be considered defensible terrain?if yes, how much models can get in?
-
2 hours ago, ManlyMuppet88 said:
hose poor people who burned their armies when AOS launched.....
haha they have reaped what they have sown
Archaon it has been removed from tzeentch heroes in scrolls builder, he can still be used in tzeentch?
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, wargames101 said:
- Ossiarch: Have a relatively large range to choose from and could mix and match leaders. Could imagine an infantry swarm, a catapult centerpiece theme, or a mixed force.
For large range you mean beside mortek?😄they need a new battleline, maybe archers?for them hope no more warmachines, welcome to new monsters.
-
1
-
-
if they level each unit in the game we could play some napoleonic miniatures game
-
1
-
-
Cool..cool..good video I liked a lot the intro and highlighted units.
If I can, try to leave crawlers out of your next list, they aren't the same as before.-
1
-
-
hey guys, have some battle reports to share?
-
21 minutes ago, Heijoshin said:
I'm not questioning the validity of the RAW interpretation. I too also agree it is interpreted that way. It's a question of whether the RAW interpretation should take precedence when it clearly goes against the spirit of what they intended with OBR. There are many instances where GW have changed something that allows something crazy, but people have been reasonable in judging that it wasn't intended that way, and have thus ruled they won't follow it. This is one of those instances.
I saw the same vid btw, and they also said that this will probably get FAQ'd in the next round. Which I also expect.
Yeah, I agree totally with you 100%!
-
2 hours ago, Heijoshin said:
This is clearly an oversight.
The fact that your group has interpreted it as RAW is worrisome, regardless of whether it is technically correct or not right now.Even the YTchannel face hammer has interpreted it like the @Shirtripper's group.
They can't provide itself their own CA.
Yeah we need a new battletome.
-
SOLD
-
New starters, we'll see soon the first new one for obr than?
-
What list do you want to play against archaon+be'lakor and what kind of strategy you want to set?
AoS 2 - Gloomspite Gitz Discussion
in Destruction
Posted
Seems good, personally I would drop the loonboss on squig for another 5boingrot.