Jump to content

Doko

Members
  • Posts

    1,112
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Doko

  1. 11 hours ago, Nasrod said:

    Atm you have KO, Seraphon, Lumineth, Tzeentch, and IDK players enjoying Sigmar

    Agree with you, but it is better than before.

    Before were only lon,or only fec,or again tzenth,or only obr or dok etc etc.

    Yes those armys that you said are the actual broken armys that need huge nerfs in next faq,but it isnt so bad as was before

  2. I did a order to a spanish shop(im spanish) at 20 november,they delivered almost all in one week, but one box of sisters of the thorn wasnt delivered, and when i called i was told that they was waiting for gw send them.

    I called them again some days ago anx they are waiting yet,more than one month waiting for one simple box from the same shop that i usually buy and in 2\3 days usually have all ready.

  3. Dont get me wrong,the actual models are amazing and i really like them(so i bougth them lol).

    I just saw the post in lumimeths with the numbers showing fyreslayerz as the last in ranking of popularity.......i usually love play the class(in mmorpg) or the army that nobody play but in gw is a very bad omen.

    After see armys with low sells die as tomb king or bretonian i really have fear that fyreslayers gonna be forgotten for years with 0 releases untill deleted.

    Nothing is worse than after have spent so many money and time on a army be forgotten and deleted.

    I hope gw try save them releasing new kits that give many visual options and become popular

     

    I know that gw wont give them armor due to the lore, but even then can be options,as fyreslayers novices that havent their runes yet and go to the battles full armored.

    Any option as this is lore friendly to avoid the only naked dwarf

  4. I have 2000 points of fyreslayers and even then i choose the dislike option.

    Vulkite berzerkers are great as basic troop.

    Then hearthguard ranged is ok as ranged option but could have got any armor to be diferent to basic troop

    Hearthguard berzerkers weapon are great but also needed something to have diferent body than basic troop.

     

    Something as slayers of the game age of reckoning.

     

    https://m.facebook.com/officialwarhammeronline/photos/slayer/10150259624512227/

     

    I know the runes are his armor,but even for dwarfs lovers as me(i have 2000 points of fyreslayers and dispossesed\ironweld) there is a limit. A full army of 70\100 naked dwarfs with almost the same body and only changes in the weapon is a bit plain.

    I would like some as magmadroth without riders,litle magmadroth cavalry,any fyre golem,armored fyreslayers as the pic i showed etc.

    But after 5 years since his release and the 0 new units that they got(scenary,endless spells or shadespire dont count) while daemons got 99999 new units per example makes me think that were a faill,and gw only gonna ignore them

    • Like 1
  5. It is from old warhammer fantasy lore,dwarfs used hammers or axes and NEVER swords and elfs used swords and lances but never hammers.

    Hammers was a dwarf weapon and sword for elfs in fantasy lore so it is pretty hard to see elfs with hammers as if now gw release a new dwarf army with longswords and myself would see it weird

    • Confused 1
  6. 8 hours ago, Thiagoma said:

    In general i dislike every single helmet. The traditional Winged cone helmets were to me a huge (pun non intended) part of the High Elf identity and it is gone in favor of generic "historical lite" helmets on the Vanari and the really bizarre Alarith ones.

    Im with you.

    I really dont think the lumineth are ugly,but......i like so much more the old elfs than this.

    Dragon blades are a 10\10 when the new cavalry is a 6\10

    Lothern guard is a 8\10,the new lancers a 7\10

    Sisters of the watch or shadows are a 8\10 and new archers a 7\10

    White lions,swordmasters or phoenyx are a 9\10 and new hammerers are 8\10

    Phoenyx are a 10\10 but the cow is a 4\10

    Dragonlord a 8\10 and teclis a 2\10

    In my opinion lumineths are better made and more dinamic,but have uglier aesthetical than old elfs.

    But im a fan of warhammer end of times and age of reckoning game estetical so even if i have fyreslayer, i also have dispossesed and for me disposessed are so much better than kharadrons or fyreslayers

  7. It is needed need something with the branwych to play her as branwraith? Im starting to get some silvaneth to play as living city and in a long future maybe silvaneth and i tougth get some start collecting and only tell that all my branwychs are branwraith with 0 conversion.

    I know that if i play one as wych and other as wraith is confuse,but if all are wraith i guess there arent a problem.

    I never gonna buy finecast

  8. Yes i left them out because the shooting in that armys isnt the main problem.

    Kroak is the danger in fang of sotek and not the skinks and the problem with tzenth is the insane number of wounds of horrors per his cost and the teleport units.

    Per example city of sigmar have many shooting units and some of these are one of the best of the game in point per wound done,but city of sigmar isnt in the actual meta,and even in citys the best list is karl franz and cavalry and not shooting.

    Yes there are undercosted shooting units as skinks,flamers,horrors or lumineths but that it is all.

     

  9. The problem isnt shooting.

    What shooting list are broken?

    Kharadrons: due to be low drop and the broken can move of the alegiance,nerf points and the alegiance and balanced

    Stormcast one drop list: nerf the big battallion so cant be played in matched play and balanced

    Lumineth: nerf 20 points to lancers and 30 to archers and balanced

    Shooting units cost as 30% more than melle units with same damage. Looking at numbers ranged must be bufed,the problem are others things as attack double of stormcast etc and not the ranged units

    • Confused 2
  10. Yes 40k get more releases than aos,but it is because 40k sells more than aos(aos with the time is shorthing this gap)

    But i can tell you that 40k is going a bad end due to how bad have been this edition.

    In my city many people are sick of all the marines releases,the meta being 100% only marines and how hard tau have been done umplayables.even the marines fanboys are sick of playing only mirror games of marines vs marines

    Myself hadnt played with my tau since 2 years ago and i just sell all the army(that money have been re invested in finish my fyreslayer army,expand my cos army with some silvaneths for living city and expand it with dark elfs for anvilguard)

     

    • Like 3
  11. I think that a army with only 3 units out of heros and 5 years since was released(fyreslayers) must get any new kit before armys as slanesh that got many kits less one year ago or lumineth that were released months ago.

     

    It is a joke as gw is releasing new kits for these armys when fyreslayers(and ironjaws but they have bonespliters now) :

    is the army with less units of the game(ok behemaths have less but....).

    Is the oldest of all aos(original aos1 army)

    Is the army with more monotone aesthetical(all nude dwarfs)

     

    Fyreslayers need some big as cavalry,armored dwarfs,or a join tome together other dwarfs,but need something

    • Like 2
    • Confused 1
    • LOVE IT! 1
  12. I just bougth 20 heathguard zerkers and i just built 4, what do you do with all the extra bits of symbols and keys?

    Im triying put one extra key,one extra symbol and one throwing axe in every model but the symbols are so tiny that is hard to glue them and hard find spots in the waist with the original symbol, weapn and axe

  13. Eternal guard are better as units of 10 if you gonna let them sit in a objetive and better as 20\30 if you want figth with them

    Wildwood rangers are useless,the worst elite unit of all aos,every other elite unit cost the same or less,have same damage or better and have better save, dont use them and build them as eternal guard

    Sister of the thorn are overcosted as mage,and have too much low damage to be used as damage unit so usually they are ****** because you are better bringing a 80 points mage if you want magic or wildriders(or any other cos cavalry) if you want damage

    Sisters of the watch are one of the best shooting units of citys of sigmar.

    Wildriders are great and our best dps cavalry,are cheap and have great damage but bad save(glasscanon)

     

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  14. 54 minutes ago, Greybeard86 said:

    Now, what do people want? Honestly, I think a lot of people want to revisit old themes and armies with a mixture of new and old sculpts. I think most want square bases and not a skirmish game. And, as long as there is enough people willing to pay for it, GW seems happy to provide.

    I hope they allow for some cross-compatibility for the new and likely expensive units, though.

    I hope be 100% plastic as necromunda or i wont buy nothing of resin.

    Also i havent too much hopes,im happy with two plastic units of dwarfs,humans,high elf and wood elfs. Great to mix with my citys army

  15. As fantasy lover (but that i never played it) i am very excited and moreover as city of sigmar player.

     

    I really want try as fantasy was played  and even if the game isnt played here where i live or i dont like, i gonna get every human,dwarf, high elf etc mini that i like to use it in my citys army in aos.

    But its a shame that it be in that timeframe, i love the heroes of end times as ungrim,thorgrim etc that arent in this old worl time

×
×
  • Create New...