Jump to content

zombiepiratexxx

Members
  • Posts

    257
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zombiepiratexxx

  1. 7 hours ago, Enoby said:

    Every time I think of Slaangors, I get more frustrated. It's a nice buff in BoC, but even then, they don't benefit from the breyherd stuff so no one would ever take them; they're basically worse minotaurs. 

    I am just baffled by the idea that the rules writers okay'd their rules. Like, surely someone must have noticed how poor they were? 

    Even if you give them +1 rend and damage (putting them at 3 4/3/-2/2), they're about as good as (non-buffed) minotaurs, which aren't considered good. 

    It's baffling. 

    There has to be balance in the Force, for every Fulminators or Stormdrake Guard warscroll there has to be a Slaangors one to even things out :D 

    • Haha 1
    • Sad 1
  2. Depends what you mean by "pure mortals" if you mean have a mortal army with a sideboard of Daemons for summoning then yes, I'd say that's the way to do it 100%, although some Daemons are good to have in your starting army. But if you mean, "I only want to play mortals and I have no interest in the Daemons" you're going to have a much harder time as our units are costed as they are because you are expected to summon in significant reinforcements through the game via your Depravity generation. 

  3. I got the Battleforce for Christmas as it literally contains all the mortal units I wanted to make sure that my existing Daemons are now a proper 3.0 army. Considering the discount you can get it's possible to save 50% off retail for units that can be quite expensive to purchase so I'd say it's a great buy. 

  4. 4 hours ago, Enoby said:

    While I think it's a fair addition to ensure summoning never becomes too strong, I do think they've reacted to summoning as if it was still mid 2019. The summoning nerfs to objectives is fine on its own, but the massive points increase and focus on it over other allegiance abilities has been an overcorrection in my mind (and potentially could be seen that summoning is a downside as it's cost so much).

    I do understand why they were so cautious around Slaanesh, but at the same time, it felt like they were making decisions based on an outdated meta when they were making all of the extra balance checks for summoning. 

    Totally agree on this point. The nerf bat swung too far and too harshly, if everything went back to book values rather than 3.0 I think things would be a better start. Sadly Slaangors need far more than just a points tweak. 

    • Like 3
  5. Also, let's not forget that in terms of Battle Tactics summoning actually becomes a weakness because nothing you summon can achieve certain Battle Tactics as they specify that it's only models from the starting army that are allowed to score. So summoning a Kipper may help with extra VPs for completing some stuff with a monster, you might not be able to score at all in the first place. 

    • Like 1
  6. I'd much rather depravity work like Waaagh points in Big Waaagh Warclans. Where your depravity is a tally and that the more points you get equates to bonuses like +1 to hit, +1 to wound, +1 to cast, +1 to AS and then, once you get to a large tally of points you can spaff it all on a turn of delicious climax and get like +1 attack on every melee weapon in the army for a turn or something, then it all resets as the ecstasy fades. Wouldn't be hard to do, gets rid of Summoning which means units can be better priced and balanced. It's not that hard to do and still make it feel like a Slaanesh army. 

    • Like 1
  7. As an anecdote to support all your points, when Slaanesh got its proper AoS tome I grabbed a couple of start collecting sets, Fiends, Daemonettes, enough to get a good start on the army. Slaanesh has always been my favourite Chaos power and I used to play pure Slaanesh in Fantasy battle (sold off when GW was at its darkest point). So, when the new book came out with new models I was all over it. I didn't get to play during the 2.0 hey day but painted a unit of Daemonettes quicker than anything I'd ever painted before or since. Then the new book came out and so I grabbed it, even though the previews were kind of sucky but the models were amazing. All I got that initial weekend was the book, cards and dice. I never bought any of the new mortals. The rules seemed so lackluster, the nerfs too far and too deep, the points increases were insane and Daemons seemed relegated to summoning, so I'd need to put a lot of money into the mortals side to feel like I wouldn't just get curbstomped every game. I don't care too much about winning but the best games are the ones where either side can, I just wanted to be able to have good games where my opponent and I both feel like we have a chance. 

    So, rather than spend a lot of money in getting the mortals I would have liked (not to mention the tricky part of actually building a list that felt like it had teeth) I actually used the money I would have needed to buy mortal stuff and picked up 2k of Daughters of Khaine (another army I have always liked as Witch Elves were my favourite unit in OG Dark Elves which I also played in WHFB). 

    Therefore, that book and the decision made completely stopped me from spending money. It's all coming OK in the end as I've ordered the Christmas battlebox, but that's because it's an almost 50% discount on buying the stuff separately and contains just what I'd be buying if I had the choice. 

    I'm buying it for a love of the models, army, lore and aesthetic, rather than the fact I expect them to win. I doubt that many others are as taken with the faction as I am and are willing to put their hard earned disposable income into it. I find the irony quite delicious that Slaanesh players tend to be passionate about the faction and stick loyally to their obsessions lol. 

    • Like 3
  8. Pre-ordered my box through an online retailer so it's almost 50% saving for me (if they get the stock they say they are). Will he happy if I do get it as it's all the mortals I don't own but would give me the core of the army I feel I need to be able to put on the table so I can then use the 3500pts of pure Daemons that I own lol. 

    • Like 1
  9. 21 hours ago, W1tchhunter said:

    Any experts around? How's this look. I love the trogs and think they hit hard enough to base an army around. Would love to play this but don't wanna fork out for 3 breakabosses if it's terrible haha.

     

    Allegiance: Kruleboyz  - Warclan: Big Yellers  - Grand Strategy: Hold the Line  - Triumphs: Inspired

    LEADERS Breaka-Boss on Mirebrute Troggoth (180)*- General- Command Trait: Egomaniak  - Artefact: Vial of Manticore Venom - Mount Trait: Smelly 'Un

    Breaka-Boss on Mirebrute Troggoth (180)- Mount Trait: Fast 'Un

    Breaka-Boss on Mirebrute Troggoth (180)

    Killaboss with Stab-grot (110)**

    Swampcalla Shaman with Pot-grot (105)*

    Swampcalla Shaman with Pot-grot (105)*

    UNITS 20 x Gutrippaz (360)****

    20 x Hobgrot Slittaz (160)***

    10 x Hobgrot Slittaz (80)***

    3 x Man-skewer Boltboyz (120)*

    3 x Man-skewer Boltboyz (120)*

    3 x Man-skewer Boltboyz (120)**

    1 x Marshcrawla Sloggoth (150)****

    CORE BATTALIONS

    *Warlord **Vanguard ***Hunters of the Heartlands ****Hunters of the Heartlands

    ADDITIONAL ENHANCEMENTS Mount Trait

    TOTAL: 1970/2000     WOUNDS: 154 LEADERS: 6/6    BATTLELINES: 4 (3+)    BEHEMOTHS: 0/4    ARTILLERY: 0/4 ARTEFACTS: 1/1    ENDLESS SPELLS & INVOCATIONS: 0/3    ALLIES: 0/400 REINFORCED UNITS: 2/4    DROPS: 13

    You can't take more than one Hunters battalions btw, Battle packs ones are single use only. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...