Cthulhus Lawyer Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Guys does the rule for the netters of the Grots stack ? My opponent has at least 5 netters in front of me , so that means that i cant hit him , regardless of my roll? I would think my Warboss on a Maw Krusha could take on some grots .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undead4Life Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 No, by the wording it maxes at -1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderHemedinger Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Undead4Life said: No, by the wording it maxes at -1. What's the wording state? Has this been on faq? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undead4Life Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 "Your opponent must subtract 1 from any hit rolls made in the combat phase for any of their models that are within 2" of a Grot with a Barbed Net." Presumably it would say "any Grot" instead of "a Grot" if it meant for them to stack. Common sense also dictates that it doesn't stack or people would be able to run units of 40 Netters and completely stupid-neuter the entire enemy force for the whole game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexanderHemedinger Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 5 minutes ago, Undead4Life said: "Your opponent must subtract 1 from any hit rolls made in the combat phase for any of their models that are within 2" of a Grot with a Barbed Net." Presumably it would say "any Grot" instead of "a Grot" if it meant for them to stack. As it stands, each net is a 2" radius bubble. Common sense also dictates that it doesn't stack or people would be able to run units of 40 Netters and completely stupid-neuter the entire enemy force for the whole game. Thank you so much. That would be broken totally! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.