Jump to content

Ar-Pharazôn

Members
  • Posts

    241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ar-Pharazôn

  1. 5 minutes ago, Sleboda said:

    Oh no! Say it ain't so! A highly successful, multi-national, decades-lasting business that spends its resources (time, money, etc.) producing a product wants to exercise its rights to control how that product is obtained by others and to choose how it feels is the best way to recoup its investment in those products.

    Don't they know that they've only lasted this long due to luck, and that if they just did what some customers think they should do they would be able to stay in business?

    Grr.

     

    I get that people like free stuff, and I get that we may have ideas about what we think a business should and should not do, but man, somehow, some way, GW has managed to be insanely successful forging their own path despite not doing every little thing that complainers want them to do.

    I was one of those complainers when Warhammer was replaced by AoS. I even quit the hobby for about a year after having been in it for about 30 or so. But you know what? They made the right decision despite me being 100% convinced they were stupid at the time.

    I think I'll trust them to know what is best for their long term health and for the success of Warhammer. If nothing else, their stock value pretty much pays for my hobby purchases, so that's a strong indicator to me that they are doing what I, as an investor and hobbyist, want.

     

     

     

     

     

    In what possible way do you see this decision as being of benefit? What possible damage to their finances was free warscrolls doing? Games Workshop is very successful as you point out, and I'd be shocked if the existence of digital documents and free unit info hurt them in any form or fashion. Clearly people here aren't just demanding free goods without cause. I'd wager just about anyone active on a Warhammer forum would likely be someone who owns books and models from them. GW has already taken quite a lot of cash from people. We are people who have invested time, effort, and money into not just a board game but a hobby, a social experience, an artistic endeavor. I'd argue we are just as much investors as any stock owner is. If people want something that eases play and increases accessibility, how is that wrong? Why is accessibility bad? Why are we not justified in seeking changes that make the hobby more open for casual people and those on the fence?

    • Thanks 9
  2. 40 minutes ago, azdimy said:

    At $50 in the US, I will no longer buy a battletome for all the armies I own

     

    50? I checked a currency converter and it said £30 is around $41 or so. If that is GW prices before third party discount, wouldn't you only be paying 36 or so?

  3. So White Dwarf is going to be the way to update armies that aren't on the near-term Battletome schedule. Sons of Behemat was representative of this then. 

    With respect to the next book, I think the Chaoe BT is either Khorne, Beasts, or maybe Nurgle.

  4. 1 hour ago, PrimeElectrid said:

    Apparently I was completely wrong. According to someone who watched it, Hammers of Sigmar apparently get 6+ ward when wholly within 12 of an objective

     

    Not a bad way to minimize some wounds for when you use Scions of the Storm. Suppose a 5+ ward would have already been too much on a faction that is already a little hardy.

  5. Start Collecting OBR should be the Liege-Kavalos/Zandtos kit, a set of Kavalos, and then Mortek Guard.

    Start Collecting Gutbusters should be a partial repackage of Feast of Bones, with Tyrant, Ironblaster/Scrap Launcher, Leadbelchers, and Gluttons.

    Start Collecting Bonesplitterz should be a Savage Big Boss, Wurrgog, Savage Orruks set, and Savage Boarboys set.

     

     

  6. My first thought was Khorne-marked marauders, but then I remembered those already exist. If it isn't Khornegors I'd venture it is a more tribal Khorne unit, perhaps a Khorne marked version of say, a Darkoath Chieftain or Warqueen. A marauder hero for Khorne.

  7. On an upbeat note, on some level this delay does give people more time to finish hobby stuff and buy books or models they want before prepping their hobby spaces and wallets for the deluge of Stormcast and Orruks a few weeks or so down the road. Especially for people who haven't finishes up their Dominion minis yet.

     

    Returning to the ostensible point of the thread, I wanted to know if anyone has tried to look through the Corebook to see if any potential shift in lore is mentioned for the Chaos factions, anything pointing to the one army getting the release later this year.

    • Like 1
  8. More wishlisting than rumor but I'd enjoy a faction based heavily on martial arts/wuxia fiction, who emphase elite units with superlative combat skills and heroes who combine magical aptitude with fighting ability. They could have monsters based on Chinese guardian lions and dragons, as well as peasant infantry for archers and spearmen. 

    • Like 1
    • LOVE IT! 2
  9. Recently became a SBGL player and have worked towards getting 1000pts. Plan on playing them soon against my friend who does Mawtribes. This is the list I've made. Thoughts?

     

    Allegiance: Soulblight Gravelords
     - Lineage: Vyrkos Dynasty
     - Mortal Realm: Shyish
     - Grand Strategy: Prized Sorcery
     - Triumphs: 
    LEADERS
    Vampire Lord (140)*
    - General
    - Command Trait: Pack Alpha 
    - Lore of the Vampires: Spirit Gale
    Necromancer (125)*
    - Artefact: Arcane Tome 
    - Lore of the Deathmages: Fading Vigour
    Wight King on Skeletal Steed (130)*


    UNITS
    5 x Black Knights (120)*
    10 x Deathrattle Skeletons (85)*
    10 x Deathrattle Skeletons (85)*
    20 x Grave Guard (280)*
    - Great Wight Blades


    CORE BATTALIONS
    *Battle Regiment
     

×
×
  • Create New...