[Shifting Model Number Bonuses]

1 hour ago, Vextol said:

True but I was hoping more "warscroll-y", "matched play-y".  I do like anything that adds flair though!  

It can be simple. 

Unit has 75% or less, rounding down, than its minimum size -> roll on the table. 

If unit has 50% or less, rounding down -> roll twice, choose one

If unit has 25% or less, rounding down -> roll twice, choose both. 

You still play full points for the unit. 

 

If you want poonts per models instead, use the skirmish system to calculate points. 

[Shifting Model Number Bonuses]

You can use the new regiments of renown rules for undersized units. 

[So, what do we think of the new Contrast paints?]

Black Templar unavailable... 

My order will have to wait. 

[How strict is Wysiwyg?]

1 hour ago, Adolmaea said:

Might be a stupid question, but - I'm making a conversion of Knight-Azyros - body from female evocator and staff, lantern, scrolls and wings from Azyros. On one hand, there doens't seem to be any problems with this models - prosecutors all male, fight in units and has no lanterns,  knight-venator is using bow. Ut on the other hand I can imagine people being like "This is flying evocator, not Azyros". Any recommendations, please?

Flying+Lantern should be enough

[How strict is Wysiwyg?]

I could accept certain level of conversion (liberators using axes as blades, or maces as hammers), but I could not accept a weapon with its own rules being used as another weapon (grandhammers as grandblades). 

I'm most permissive with models without weapon options, as long as they could not feature another model better.

Mi opinion is:

If the model or weapon has its own rules, use its own rules. 

If the model or weapon does not have rules, use the rules of the most closed option (has edge, it is two handed... ) 

Another example with skyhooks in kharadrons. I could not allow another specific weapon as a proxy, but a minimal spear conversion is allowed (as skyhooks are the most similar to spears within all weapon options). 

[So, what do we think of the new Contrast paints?]

It is there any review with zenithal priming? 

[The Rumour Thread]

I will say Everchosen+Warriors of Chaos+Daemon Engines+Darkoath. 

If there is no new barbarian box I will be disappointed. 

Rest of models seem fine (except Furies) . So I hope there is space for new units. 

[Age of Sigmar RPG]

I cannot wait to make a campaign with my Vermintide XIII antagonists. 

[Age of Sigmar RPG]

9 hours ago, Mungrun said:

Can we expect a translated version of the game in the future? In my case i'm from Spain.

Being also from Spain and not being done from GW, I expect some spanish distributor (Edge, nosolorol, etc) to do the translations. 

However, expect a long delay after the english release. 

[Age of Sigmar RPG]

Just so I can understand. 

We have 3 attributes (mind, body, soul) 

We have X skills that can combine which each of that attributes. 

f. e:

If we have an "Agility" skill we could throw:

Agility+body for speed. 

Agility+mind for reflexes. 

Agility+soul for performance. 

However, if we have an "Endurance" skill we could throw:

Endurance+body for stamina. 

Endurance+mind for madness. 

Endurance+soul for morale. 

 

Am I close? 

[Current State of the Armies]

3 hours ago, Lobeau said:

Under Chaos add Legion of Azgorh (Forgeworld Chaos Dwarves) thier PDF from Forgeworld was updated for AoS 2.0, including allegiance abilities, battle traits, a unique spell (fireball from Aquishy spells regardless of realm) 3 command traits, 3 artifacts of power and 3 warscroll battalions. Thanks!

Also, Tamurkhan Horde as a Nurgle addon with new allegiance abilities.

[Current State of the Armies]

Beastclaw raiders have an old battletome with their own allegiance ability, aswell as Bonesplitterz. 

[Age of Sigmar RPG]

Will the system support the use of models?

Will the system support the no use of models? 

[The Rumour Thread]

Nobody posts the khornate dragon?