Jump to content

Hollow

Members
  • Posts

    620
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Hollow

  1. 14 minutes ago, zilberfrid said:

    Because they reproduce asexually. This implies neither boy parts nor girl parts.

    I know that they refer to themselves with male pronouns, I just think it's silly.

    Pfft. GW Orks are based on 1980's football holligans. Men running around drunk starting fights. 

  2. I really like some of the models and I Vamps are solid and Krag is interesting. To be honest I would be kinda ok for Beasts to be moved from Chaos to Destruction, have his return break the beasts from Chaos and follow him. Would add a lot to the Destruction Grand Alliance and Chaos already has a lot going on. 

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  3. A starter box featuring Seraphon or Cities Of Sigmar/Beastmen or Skaven. I like the look of the new CoS witch hunters and I hope they explore that side of things more for Cities. I'd like to see updated kits for flagellants and other fanatics. Priests, Witch-hunters and the like (Think the Witcher on steriods) 

    Death - Vampires

    Destruction - Ogres. 

    I also think, that perhaps with the exception of one last Duardin faction to represent the more tradional Dward Asthetic and an additional Destruction faction to bring something fresh to the game, I don't think there should be any more factions added.  Having 10 x Order, 7 x Chaos, 5 x Death, 5 x Destruction makes for a total of 17 factions. A clear focus over the coming years of retiring older models, replacing resin could have AoS in a very "complete" state mid AOS 3.0. 

     

    • Like 1
  4. 25 minutes ago, Dead Scribe said:

    I'm gutted.  Some of our older players set up a WHFB 8th edition game day yesterday.  The amount of interest really kicked me in the gut.  There were so many people that showed up for it yesterday, I had no idea that that many people wanted WHFB back.  I haven't even seen a lot of the guys that showed up before in my life.

    Its really going to tear my community apart and endanger our AOS group.

    I really don't understand this. You were gutted because lots of people turned up to play games and have fun? 

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 3
  5. This announcment has been met with genuine cheer! 

    I think it is interesting that they chose "The Old World" subtitle and map to go with it, rather than the 'World' map that we saw in the 8th edition rulebook. I'd love it if the main 'Factions" are Bretonnia, The Empire, Estalia, Tilea, The Badlands, Albion, Kislev and Norsca with a smattering of other races such as beastmen and greenskins as disorganised feral tribes, with the main focus being on the wars of men with a kind of 'low-magic' vibe to contrast with the 'high-magic' vibe of AoS. The forces would be square based and the size of 4th/5th edition armies. 

    • Like 2
  6. I really like them. The  fact they are new and bringing something different to the table is cool. There has literally been 30+ years of generic fantasy skeletons released and  dozens of versions from different providors. Some people seem to be stuck in a never ending cycle of re;ease, tweak, update, repeat. 

    • Like 1
  7. 20 hours ago, Kurrilino said:

    Same here. If you have a product show some teasers and show what it really is 2 weeks before release.

    It's similar to the movie industry now where they tease movies released in 2028

    Haha! How times change. People used to cry and complain about that kind of thing. Now GW has changed it people want to be kept in the dark. Damned if yah do. 

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...