Hollow
-
Posts
611 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by Hollow
-
-
Whilst I agree that it would be a shame for Sigmar and the Cities to just become Imperium 2.0. I do feel that over-the-top Grimdark is quintessentially "WARHAMMER" regardless if it's Fantasy or Sci-Fi. I love the fact that GamesWorkshop's roots are the grim 80s of post-industrial Northern England. The Warhammer vibe has always been for things to be so ludicrously awful that they become funny, which is so typical of British humor. Whilst it is inevitable for Gameworkshop to inject a little more light and hope into its settings (to appeal more to an American audience, who are hugely more optimistic than the Brits) I hope they stay true to their roots and Age Of Sigmar is able to forge it's own dark path.
-
6
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Ragest said:
Why are you on the rumour thread if you don't want spoilers?
There is a big difference between rumors and leaks. Even the biggest rumor-mongers understand this. Regardless, it doesn't really matter. I just gave my opinion about what I think is decent compared to what is not. It is clear some agree and some do not. If people are using justifications of "GamesWorkshop doesn't pay people enough IMO so they deserve everything and anything that happens to them (which is also not true, GW pays above average and pays out thousands in bonuses to its staff). There isn't much point.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Marcvs said:
I don't see how potato pics reduce in any way your enjoyment of the final reveal "in all its intented glory" on Warcom
It's not just about "my enjoyment" it is respect for the dozens (if not more) designers, writers, sculptors and painters who have worked on the project.
1 hour ago, Marcvs said:Pics of minis are not a story that can be spoiled for you
Again. I am not thinking about it in this way at all. "spoilers" for anything can easily be avoided. It is the designers that I feel for. Let the company follow its plan (then perhaps criticise that plan)
1 hour ago, Marcvs said:Finally, leaks are pro-consumers
I couldn't disagree more. What is pro-consumer - GW entering into good faith NDA agreements with content creators in order for them to have early access to figures they can paint up and record batreps/reviews/tutorials with so that consumers have quality information regarding upcoming releases.
1 hour ago, Marcvs said:I would always welcome them for my fellow hobbyists.
You welcome the breaking of good faith NDAs that fly in the face of planned release schedules? I don't. I think that is a pretty low thing to do TBH. I'd never break an NDA that I voluntarily entered into in order to have access to free product. As I know that in doing so, I would not only jeopardise my ability to maintain a healthy relationship with a company but could also potentially jeapordise other people's livelihoods. There is an entire sub-economy based around content creation for GW products.
-
2
-
1
-
3
-
-
I find it rather strange that there are people confused by the concept of not liking potato-cam pics from people breaking NDAs. I know that GW is a large company but some seem to forget that it is a company made up of people. Dozens of artists, sculptors, painters and designers will have worked on a project like this for weeks, months, or even years.
As a designer myself I would be incredibly disappointed to see a product that I and others had poured their heart and soul into be leaked online by someone breaking an NDA. The stuff is coming. I understand people are excited and want to see more, but patience is a virtue and being confused by someone wanting to see the reveals how the designers and company had originally planned is... well, confusing.
-
5
-
4
-
-
Of course. Folks getting stuff early will be under NDA.
-
I kind of hope we don't get a bunch of potato pics of new models. Would much rather see them on Warcom in their intended glory.
-
2
-
1
-
4
-
-
This lil beauty from the early 90's.
-
3
-
-
Having an entire magic mini-game within the actual game was always cumbersome. Much prefer the idea that a firebolt is fired in the shooting phase. Gives the spells character, the opposite of bland. Having everything done in a slow, bogged-down phase that only certain factions completely dominate is the definition of bland to me, and always was. Much better this way.
-
6
-
2
-
-
Maybe a Half-elf?
-
40 minutes ago, Noserenda said:
Look at the pictures
Yeah... you are looking too much into that IMO. Marketing images are not representative of game rules. Never have been.
-
10 minutes ago, Noserenda said:
Characters not in units was my main extra takeaway
Huh? You read this;
"Combined with the freedom to create and arm characters as you choose from a wide range of options, players have a lot of strategic choices to make when building their units and writing their muster lists, choices that will, in turn, inform their tactics on the battlefield."
and that was your takeaway? 🤔
-
Oh, there is no doubt that the vast majority of people who buy GW models do so to collect, paint and model rather than to play games of Warhammer.
-
Well, I'm not going to introduce or play with House Rules when I am not playing in my House (or in somebody else's) I have played in plenty of clubs and groups over the years that have generic house rules like (No Special Characters) I don't really understand what you are discussing with your opponent beforehand that is taking so much time? I just bring a few copies of my army list, with short descriptions of the units (and their main abilities) which I hand to my opponent before we play. They might have a couple of questions but that takes all of 2 minutes.
When I'm talking about proxies, it has to be in good faith (I always try to play in good faith, I don't do Gotcha nonsense or try to break the game with silly combos or by interpreting rules in a bad-faith manner) I am there to have fun, not try and stomp an opponent, perfectly happy to lose if the game is fun. The models should make sense as the thing they are. (I'm not putting down an ashtray and calling it a tank) But I would happily field some fantasy High Elf models (correctly based and nicely painted) as some Lumineth for example.
-
1
-
-
The other smaller starter sets have been very reasonable IMO.
-
7 hours ago, Marcvs said:
So, basically, our anecdotal experience disagrees and we have to leave it at that.
I am firmly in the camp that the vast majority of games is played on the basis of matched play rules (with or without some tinkering)
Yeah, opposite experiences and views. I am firmly in the camp that the vast majority of games are played in casual environments using a mixture of PL, points, narratives, proxies and house rules.
12 hours ago, Grimrock said:For you having models rotated out isn't a big deal, your friends don't care if you're using Lorenzo Lupo in a City of Sigmar army or any other kit from 20 years ago for that matter
Funnily enough, I have never had any problems (At FLGS, Warhammer stores, Game clubs, or even tournaments) using conversions or well-thought-out and easily identifiable proxies. This is using matched play rules against people I have never met.
What kind of person would go to a store, meet someone who goes through their list and models, all of which are nicely painted, based, and easily identifiable, and say "No way, put those in the bin, I refuse to play against anything that isn't the exact current model!"
Perhaps I am lucky? I've just never encountered people like that IRL. (Out of thousands over the years) I only encounter this thought process online.
-
3
-
-
6 minutes ago, Grimrock said:
I've been in the hobby for nearly 25 years now and I struggle to understand how it's possible anybody could buy these models from a pure hobby perspective with no care for the rules whatsoever.
Surely in that time, you have seen just how redundant "rules" for models actually are. They are just abstract made-up ideas and concepts that can be changed with a simple sentence between friends. I struggle to understand how it's possible anybody could buy these models for anything OTHER than a pure Hobby perspective, it's the only thing that actually lasts. In my world (40k at least) there are 10 editions worth of rules and the same models all have different rules in each of them. The rules come and go. The models stay forever.
It takes all types and people just have very different experiences. The people I know consider this hobby to be very value-driven generally. A few hundred quid and you have something that can literally be used for decades.
-
1
-
1
-
-
I think the vast majority of people playing GW games are not on forums/ at tournaments and don't play in clubs or at Warhammer/FLG stores but in their living rooms with 1 or 2 friends. They aren't part of "gaming communities" in any way. It's all anecdotal I suppose. I just don't see how a company selling hundreds of millions of pounds worth of products a year can be supported by the mere thousands of people represented in groups and online. Even the biggest tournaments in the world have less than 1k participants.
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, Marcvs said:
But that (the second half) is exactly the point
Well... it kinda wasn't. I would have agreed if the point was a NEW player entering the hobby will get that impression because matched play dominates online debate and many pick-up spaces. I was disagreeing with the assertion that 99% of the existing player base is only aware of matched rules. I think the vast majority of players playing the game are doing so in casual environments.
This is purely anecdotal and I could be completely wrong. Although I feel like there is quite a difference between gaming scenes in Europe and the USA. The US seems to be a lot more competitive and focused on points/meta/tournies than in Europe.
-
1
-
-
Sigvald has been marked as 'Sold Out Online' for a number of weeks. (at least in the UK) Don't believe he is gone, but might not be back for a while (repackage maybe)
-
4 hours ago, Gitzdee said:
I fully support this. Its almost like 99% of the player base doesnt know other game modes exist and are worth playing.
Funnily enough, I think the reality is the complete opposite. I believe the vast, vast majority of Warhammer games are played in casual environments amongst friends. The hyper-focused, online crowd of meta-chasing tourney players are in fact the minority but think they are the majority (mainly because they dominate online discourse).
This is my own personal opinion but I think if you were able to really look into it, the percentage of customers who have purchased a product from GW in the last 12 months and not even played a single Warhammer game (never mind a competitive one) in that time, accounts for 90%+ of the total customer base.
-
2
-
-
8 minutes ago, novakai said:
Does sound wishy washy the way you say it though especially when you conflate all of Humanity though
PHD should know better
I shall aspire to employ the same rigorous academic standards to casual forum posts as my multiple thesis, I shall also refrain from trying to bring a little helpful perspective to those I perceive as a bit down about anything. I apologise profusely, how could I have been so awful!?! I like my Grimdark in wargames. Not real life. I won't reply to any further comments on what was intended to be an innocent pick-me-up.
Anyways... 🙄
Looks like Kruel Boyz to me. Would love to see some cavalry options for the swampy bois. Although it could be Troggoth related?
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, jerhien said:
I have a degree in Anthropology, and this sounds like ****** to me.
If you're gonna quote Pinker, just don't.
A degree! Wow!
Somebody with a degree in Anthropology should know what a quote is. I didn't quote anybody. Although, if I want to, I will quote anybody I like. I have 2 BAs, an MA and a PHD. Bow before my superior academic qualifications peasant!
(I also know how worthless and bankrupt much of Academia is. Having worked in it for years)
Regardless. I wasn't trying to make some political point. I was trying to provide a little perspective, to what I perceived as someone feeling a bit down about how things appear to be these days. That is all. So get back in your box.
-
5
-
1
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, CommissarRotke said:
State of the world isn't helping either.
I don't want to get off-topic. Just remember that perspective is important and a lot of the information sources of today thrive on pumping out negative narratives. It's important to step back and look at the big picture. 2023 is THE BEST time to be living for the vast majority of human beings, better than any other time in human history. Hundreds of millions of humans have been lifted out of extreme poverty, with more access to education, health and information than ever before.
As for the GW release cycle, I'm not a fan of how much isn't actually new stuff. If you look at the pre-order page on the GW website today, there isn't really a single new thing. It's just all repackaged stuff in different starter sets. (Incidentally, many of my local FLG's and Warhammer stores still have dozens of copies of Levithian sitting on the shelves.)
I find frequently that I think, "damn, so many new things coming out this week! 12+ preorders" but when you actually look into it, it's only maybe a handful of actually new things. I sincerely hope this trend doesn't get out of control ( I fear it might with the number of old kits returning for TOW) where they just start churning out old stuff, repackaged because it's nearly all profit)
-
5
-
1
-
2
-
-
I always have kinda seen Underworlds as AoS "Necromunda" type setting.
-
1
-
The "mortals redesign" Discussion
in Age of Sigmar Discussions
Posted
I know this is a joke, but this totally 40k to me. The plucky escape, heroism, and fighting against the odds, only to escape into the arms of the waiting imperium, who are even worse!