Jump to content

LordSolarMach

Members
  • Posts

    153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by LordSolarMach

  1. 37 minutes ago, HorticulusTGA said:

    The old Lord-Veritant had a 40mm base Gryph-hound (only the Lord-Imperatant has a 32mm one and the Excelsior Warpriest from Silver Tower a 25mm one), so 1:1 proxy is 100% possible.

    In spearhead at least, it appears that the Gryph-hound is a token, so the base size doesn't really matter.

    Edit: and in double checking, I find out that it's actually called a "Gryph-crow". That's... a choice.

    Gryph-crows are sensitive to spiritual corruption and immediately alert their masters whenever unholy energies are nearby.

    • Like 2
  2. 2 hours ago, cyrus said:

    Bonesplitterz and BoC are out .

    yes , Stormcast has already a spearhead box . Orruk warclans is actually Kruleboyz spearhead. So we miss Ironjawz spearhead to reach 25 spearheads.

    It's possible that it's just awkward wording.

    Sans Beasts, there are (currently) 23 factions listed on the GW webstore.

    While one would naturally expect the words "any of the other 23 factions" to mean that they were excluding the two in the article... someone might have just grabbed the total, forgetting to subtract two. (Or multiple editing passes adding the "other" without considering that what that does to the number.)

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Ejecutor said:

    The Rumour Engine – 14th May 2024 - Warhammer Community (warhammer-community.com)

    RumourEngine May14 Content


    Looks to be in line with a couple of the recent ones, especially the claw:

    image.png.8cce62188bf95cedeea78f4159af5d6b.png

    I've seen it pointed out that the "hand" looks a lot like the (currently Forge World resin) Ursarax tech-thralls of 30k's Mechanicum.

    Leg looks pretty different though. (If it is them, they might be shown during Saturday's not-AoS preview show.)

  4. 4 hours ago, Grungnisson said:

    So we're looking at a Core Rules book for AoS 4, additional book for Spearhead rules for all existing Spearhead/Vanguard boxes, SCE Spearhead (either existing or new), Skaven Spearhead, some terrain and a double-sided Spearhead board.

    Unless the SCE Spearhead is a different content to the existing one, either we match Leviathan's price but don't include any new SCE models, or we add minis, and get closer to £200 than Leviathan's £150.

    The Leviathan rulebook also had Combat Patrol in it (and Crusade). (For reference, the downloadable WH40k Core Rules pdf is 60 pages, and the Combat Patrol pdf is 12 pages.) Contents of that set:

    • SM Combat Patrol + 13 additional models
    • Tyranid Combat Patrol + 15 additional models
    • 392 page rule book.
    • Cards, transfers, objective markers.

    So it's possible... though I agree with you that everyone's Spearhead having printed rules does make it seem like a separate product. (As well as the cards.) So, upon consideration, I've moved to a bit more of a fifty-fifty feeling.

    Actually, it does sound more like the 40k Ultimate Starter set (though it'd be weird to call it "the launch box", if it is the AoS equivalent). That set (which retails for £125.00) has:

    • SM and 'Nid Combat Patrols
    • 72 page Handbook and 72 page Core Rules Booklet.
    • Terrain, reference sheets, 2 gaming boards, 2 range rulers, 10 dice

    I don't think there's any indication that the Spearheads in "the launch box" will be existing ones though, and not new models.

    • Like 1
  5. 7 minutes ago, Grungnisson said:

    Yes, it can. But unless we see any hints of that, based on the information given so far, there's no such indication.

    Leviathan is a pretty big indication.

    GW's statement can be read as "it will be like Leviathan". (ie. there will be a large assortment of models in the AoS launch box, from which you can make two Spearheads, the same way as how Leviathan had a large assortment of models, from which you could make two Combat Patrols.)

    And that precedent makes me (and it seems a fair few others) think that it should be read that way.

    • Like 3
  6. 51 minutes ago, Nezzhil said:

    Spearhead is a game mode for playing buying only one box. That's not possible right now and a Spearhead before the new edition is almost impossible 

    Combat Patrol has at least one White Dwarf list that isn't available for purchase in a box (Tyranids: Insidious Infiltrators). 

    They could do something similar for Ironjawz players.

  7. I think I prefer the old "sunburst" wings to these firey ones, but the rest is an all-around improvement over their current sculpts. They're nice.

    (I also can't help but think it looks like someone nailed that piece of parchment into their groin, though.)

    • Like 1
  8. Random thought. There's some rumours in TOW rumour thread which include:

    "Various Forge World units, including the skin-wolves, firmer [sic], gore-bull BSB and the peryton, will be returning. It was stated specifically that the chaos mammoth will NOT be returning."

    I figured that the Mammoth would be a shoe-in, being very popular in Total War. (Honestly, they're the main reason to play Norsca for me.) So the fact that they're not coming back is weird... unless...

    Darkoath Mammoth coming in AoS 4.0?

    • LOVE IT! 1
  9. 3 hours ago, xAres said:

    4chan rumors confirmed?

    image0.jpg

    Just to stress: this is a de-confirm of the "leak".

    For a long time, CMValrak has been saying that there are two new Chaos Lords coming for 40k - one with a jump pack, and another that might be a new Terminator Lord.

    It appears that this false leaker decided to include the Terminator Lord in their list, rather than a Power Armour Lord.

    And now we see that the Lord is in Power Armour, and not Terminator Armour. So: the leak is bogus.

    (Which is not to say that it won't still get some stuff right - it appears to be based on a number of the most common rumours and speculations.)

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  10. 7 hours ago, Chikout said:

    ...unless they hire several more designers, I don’t see how they can do it.

    It also seems to be the case that at least one designer who was being trained to make Old World plastics left suddenly...

    I'm pretty sure there's no problem with designers, or sculptors.

    GW (and by extension Specialist Games) have a big bottleneck problem on the production side (as seen by their stock issues), and there is likely a marketing component (ie. you don't want to release vastly more than your customer base can keep up with, so teams probably have a rough number of releases they are allowed to put out in a year).

    We know that GW sits on sculpts for years - recently, as pointed out by others, the upcoming Darkoath wave shares all its design cues with the Darkoath Warqueen (released six years ago). They could just be based on her, but I also wouldn't be surprised if they've been around for quite a while.

    • Thanks 1
  11. 46 minutes ago, Clan's Cynic said:

    Bretonnians never had their own team I think...

    Blood Bowl II had a Bretonnian team, but SG seemed to have gone a similar direction when creating the Imperial Nobility team (weak peasants with Fend for Linemen, Blockers/Bodyguards with Wrestle, Blitzers with Block/Catch).

    • Like 2
  12. 2 hours ago, Landohammer said:

    Here is my anecdote: I liked the fabius bile books. So I made a Creations of Bile army a few years back. My Creations of Bile army formerly had its own chapter tactic, stratagems, warlord traits and items...

    CSM are still an Index, with the only detachment being Slaves to Darkness (ie. the Black Legion one). It's likely that when Codex: CSM comes out in ~3 months they'll get a bunch more (Space Marines have seven, 'Nids six, Ad Mech five, Necrons five, Dark Angels three + seven). One of those detachments will likely be Creations of Bile themed (provided he's not moved to a future Codex: Emperor's Children, which historically he shouldn't be but...).

    So you might not be playing your Creations of Bile sub-faction against your opponent's Iron Warriors sub-faction, but you will be playing your "Consortium Strike Force" detachment against your opponent's "Siege Tyrant Battalion" detachment.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  13. We do kind of know that it's a bit of a post-hoc justification though, thanks to CA posting the concept art (where they all had beaks). The truth is probably "GW told us to lose the beaks", but they're being diplomatic about it.

    The real reason is likely GW not wanting for TWW to step on the toes of AoS: Realms of Ruin. 

    TzaangorConceptArt.jpg.c213d2ed988dd3baee75b34775cea052.jpg

    • Like 6
  14. 14 minutes ago, EonChao said:

    Yes but those are models that still have rules for them for that edition. If I want to take my old Landspeeder to a game I can despite it not being in the codex itself

    Yeah, I saw it was addressed and made an edit (but not quickly enough!). (Though, they'd still probably have Legends rules regardless, which seems effectively the same?)

    //

    On the Spearhead vs Vanguard thing, it might be worth pointing out that the Spearhead: Stormcast Eternals is a clear equivalent to the Vanguard: Orruk Warclans.

    • Yndrasta + Knights-Vexillor + 3 Annihilators
    • 10 Vindictors
    • Stormstrike Chariot

    vs

    • Killaboss on Great Gnashtoof + Murknob with Belcha-banna + 3 Man-skewer Boltboyz
    • 10 Gutrippaz
    • Beast-skewer Killbow
    • Like 1
  15. 1 hour ago, Sealven said:

    To be fair, the Kill Team box that came out before this last one came out in May. That's a 7 month gap. Most people seem to agree there was a delay and Salvation should have come out last year.

    Plus, they have had Warcry and Kill Team go up for preorder on the same day before. There's no reason that couldn't happen again. 

    Yeah, per the roadmap Salvation was originally supposed to be out last autumn, and Nightmare this winter season (ie. next two weeks).

    Salvation missed its slot by at least a month-and-a-half, but maybe Nightmare gets back on schedule?

    //

    (Also, Into the Dark released on Sept 10th 2022, and was quickly followed by Shadowvaults on October 22nd 2022. Five weeks later.)

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  16. 8 hours ago, DD-Lord said:

    ...To be more clear on what I am saying, in the original fantasy era, the Skaven were divided into clans, those being Moulder, Verminus, Pestilens, Eshin, and Skryre. And when AoS launched, they decided to practically leave this feature intact, with the only difference being that the Skaven clans are not singular entities but rather a collection of entities, hence why they are now referred to as "Clans Moulder, Verminus, etc...

    That's more just an AoS thing.

    In WHFB there were the four Great Clans (Eshin, Skryre, Moulder, Pestilens), who were the peak of their specialisation (assassins, engineering, monsters, plagues), and then the Warlord Clans. And the four Great Clans had a lot of "thrall clans", but those thralls could be pretty loose alliances, and there were still independent clans who shared specialities. And lots of Warlord Clans who owed no one allegiance. (Mors, Rictus, Skurvy, etc.)

    In fact, Clan Pestilens having one of their thralls holding a seat on the Council of Thirteen (effectively giving them two votes) was a big deal in Skaven politics.

    • Like 2
  17. I know I'm a little late to the Beastmen discussion, but I do recall that when Ogroid Theridons were shown my first thought was "oh cool, new Minotaurs" followed by "wait, StD?" So I've had a paranoia about BoC being reduced and folded into StD for awhile now.

    //

    As to a "big Beast" that some people mentioned wanting, the 7th edition WHFB Army Book mentioned Ramhorns in a couple places. It was said that Beastmen would attach the skull of a Ramhorn onto the gate of a keep, and when the (rather stupid) Ramhorn noticed it, it would charge and shatter said gate.

    There was also a piece of art which may have been intended to represent them, or just been the fancy of the artist:

    9g7RVwQ.png

    • Like 1
  18. 1 hour ago, Morglum StormBasha said:

    ...Repanse de Lyonnese is about 80 years old when this is set as she was born in 1990...

    TOW is set around ~2276, so 286.

    It seems that the Duke of Lyonesse during this time is Gaulthiere LeGrand. As King Louis the Young gave Repanse the Dukedom in the early 2000's, it's probable that she's passed, though she could be written to have become a hermit or something. I'd not object - after all, Total War has successfully fudged her into being around in the ~2500s (with the justification that drinking from the Grail can extend your lifespan - though she seems to have gotten really lucky and be forever seventeen).

    • Like 2
  19. 5 hours ago, Fellman said:

    wath if thay are based on the oathbreak fyrslayer loges of old the los sons of grimnir, trading divien urgold power for mecanical and industruel one then thay cood look more like...

    If we get Dwarfs-who-worship-Chaos, with none of the stylings of the old Dawi Zharr, I'd be disappointed (as someone who really likes the stylings of the old Chaos Dwarfs).

    And I don't mean I want them to pull an Old World, and release thirty-year-old miniatures. But I'd want:

    • Babylonian-ish stylings (ringlet beards, tall hats)
    • Bull Monsters (Bull Centaurs, Bale Taurus, Lamassu)
    • Daemonic industry
    • Comical cruelty

    The Horns of Hashut have a good bit of the latter three, so I'm hopeful.

    The Iron Golems' Dwarf has the industrial cruelty going for him, but lacks any of that Hashut flavour (pseudo-Babylonian, bull, fire). I'd... make due, if that was the main look, but be a little disappointed.

    The Spire Tyrants' Dwarf looks like a Chaos-Marauder-who-happens-to-be-a-Dwarf. If that was the main look, I'd be incredibly disappointed. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...