[Painbringer's armies]

I've been contemplating a Sylvaneth warband for a while, and seeing those Kurnoth Hunters is making it very difficult not to drop everything and go and start it right now. Great work!

[Turragor's Progress]

You've got some excellent minis here! I really love that Stonehorn, particularly.

I'm super impressed by the basing on your BCR army as well, those are some of the nicest winter bases I've seen. Do you happen to recall the colours and processes you used? I'd like to try a similar thing, if you don't mind.

[[Shadespire] Going through all the warbands]

Really great work on all these warbands. The Duardin look good in that scheme, the high contrast suits the minis.

What did you end up using for the dark skintones on your reavers?

[OscarLars Painting Stuff - Ossiarch Bonereaper Update!]

An orruk stonehon is a magnificent conversion. Nice work! I really love the colours you've used, too.

The skin is looking great, is that a similar baneblade brown/grey to the lower fur?

[The Rumour Thread]

3 hours ago, Dez said:

CSM (they suck)

We.. we don't talk... about that book. No. I'm going to go and hug my Bloodbound now.

In all seriousness, I agree, a revamp is exactly what 40k needs. It doesn't have to be stripped right back to AoS levels (that is, 4 pages of rules -- although it could certainly be done), but restructuring would improve it immensely and could really help fix its balance and "meta" problems. A system with multiple ways of playing it similar to what we've just seen with the General's Handbook would be ideal imo.

I'd like to see it be less self-cross-referencing, for one thing. I like the idea of USRs, for example, but in practise gameplay can get crushed under the weight of them as players who haven't memorized them all have to check specifics in the main rulebook for USRs their units have which aren't explained in their sourcebooks, and so on. AoS uses keywords in a way that aids gameplay much better, I find.