Jump to content

Ironbreaker

Members
  • Posts

    286
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Ironbreaker

  1. 13 minutes ago, Furuzzolo said:

    BCR have allegiance abilities in the tome. They are mainly updating non-allegiance-abilities in the tome. (Skaven, Fec, Fyreslayers)

    edit. Don't get me wrong, I'm waiting for a KO update and I know that having bad allegiance ability equal having no ability. Still KO and BCR do have them and right now only Stormcast and Blades of Rageboi got an updated tome while already have it all.

    Nighthaunt, Beast of Chaos, FeC, Skaven, Slaanesh and Fyreslayers were in the gh18. I imagine Ironjawz and Seraphon to have priority, now...

    Or Dispossessed 😎

    Dispossessed not being released yet just means they have been working extra hard for the past 4 years to give Dispossessed a good update! 😄

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
    • LOVE IT! 1
  2. 11 minutes ago, Toddy said:

    I suspect the Warrior/Quarreller/Thunderer kit will be retired. They don't really (conceptually) add anything to the range not covered by our 4 'elite' infantry blocks, which all have lovely modern kits. 

    Dwarves riding bears always looks ridiculous (e.g. LotR and Mantic).  New cavalry units of *any* type seem in short supply since AoS started (only the IronJaws Gore-Gruntas?) I can't see GW going down that route.

    Golums seem all but inevitable (😃) perhaps with Duardin riding on top, ala the Araknarok? A tunneling machine would be awesome. I'd love a new Miner kit too, but pickaxes might seem abit twee in the New World...

    I'd rather not see Warriors go. I'd hate for all the Warriors I've bought to be null. I actually like the look of them also.

    • Like 1
  3. 6 hours ago, ManlyMuppet88 said:

    14 more Battletomes this year seems like a stretch, even with GW’s increased release schedule. I could definitely see them getting the existing Battletomes updated though.

    Haven’t been on Faeit for a long time, it just became re-posts from the Warhammer Community site - has Natfka had any reliable rumours for a while?

    I think they can get at least most of them updated by the end of the year if they keep doing the dual releases such as FEC and Skaven, and now Fyreslayers and Slaanesh. Soon we will have five battletomes released and it's only the start of April.  There might be a few stragglers left to update going into 2020.

  4. 10 hours ago, Furuzzolo said:

    2 days without TGA. I wrote a Dispossessed battletome. Really.

    Monday I'm going to put it into a google doc and share it with you, I need feedback before sending it to GW! 🤣

    Wow, I'll see about testing it out for you if my buddy will allow me.

    • Like 2
  5. 1 minute ago, Furuzzolo said:

    What make us "slow"? The shield wall.

    Static reroll failed save on units with a shield equipped? Too much?

    Imagine a runic lore, like prayers for our Runelords to pick. You leave the basic 6+ save rune on the scroll and give us 6 more to chose one from:

    -run and charge to an unit.

    - add 1  rend to a unit

    -add 5" range to a unit ranged attack

    -no battleshock for 1 units

    - add 2 to move to unit

    -set un reserve a disengaged unit, can deepstrike next turn. (Stormcast can do it instantly!)

    We bring 3 runelords to battlefield and now we have a fucktone of options.

    What blows me away is the fact the shield walls don't protect against shooting. 

  6. 11 minutes ago, Quahog said:

    Honestly, given the 'objective scenario' emphasis of AoS I just don't see it.  Dwarfs were ALWAYS bad at scenarios, and any buffs that would give us even some reasonable mobility (ie the old Anvil, or Bear Riders, or Golems) would have to be so over the top as to make us no longer who we are. 

    How about give us objective secured as an ability if we capture it first? Make the enemy have to go through 30 Ironbreakers to get us off the objective. It takes a lot to actually reach an objective with this army, why not reward accomplishing this and also highlight the stubbornness of the Duardin?

    • Like 3
  7. 12 minutes ago, kenshin620 said:

     

    I mean it's called market research my fellow. 🙁

    Unless it's because you bought a bunch during 8th edition.

    This was early around 2016 so I didn't really know. I went to a GW store and told them I wanted Dwarfs. They asked if I wanted armored or naked Dwarfs and I told them I wanted armored. They pointed me towards Dispossessed and ever since then I've been on a depressing slide towards a hobby inferiority complex.

  8. 1 minute ago, Mandzak-Miniatures said:

    Well the rumor engine pic that is an armored claw is something one of the original keeper models had.

    Beyond that, hoping for aelf soup at least. A full reveal like last year needs to be a thing.

    I am excited at the possibilities but my bar is set extremely low lol

    Aelf soup would be exciting as it would further confirm the current faction page once again.

    • Like 1
  9. 3 minutes ago, Nighthaunt Noob said:

    It would be cool if Forbidden Power included a release similar to the harbingers of Malign Portents so that we'd have an individual model to imagine a full army coming down the road off of.

    I hope forbidden power gives us non-magic armies something to play with. 

    • Like 1
  10. 2 minutes ago, xking said:

    Murder okay, genocide okay, cannibalism okay. But private parts? That's going too far. 

    Private parts makes Sigmar cry. Next time you have those bad thoughts again, think of how the Knights Excelsior would react. I suggest talking to your local warrior priest or lord exorcist if you continue to have these urges. 

    • Haha 6
  11. 3 minutes ago, Inquisitorsz said:

    Well the real question now is are we getting Slaanesh, Aelves or both?   
    Please be both. Slaanesh only really needs a new book and a new greater demon. So maybe that comes out in parallel with a new aelf range. 

    It's a long shot, but what if we get Aelf soup tonight like it's been rumored?

×
×
  • Create New...