-
Posts
82 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by silentdeathz
-
-
35 minutes ago, JackStreicher said:
I wonder if the new Battletome allows us to use the Chaos Mammoth since it has all the required Keywords.... (would be AMAZING).
Also Mierce just launched an awesome mammoth!
I imagine if GW had put out a massive plastic mammoth (they also appear in the AoS Lore) the internet would have thrown bars of gold at them XD
With the chaos mammoth being discontinued, I'd doubt that.
Unless they've been hiding a plastic one, which I also doubt. 😔
- 1
-
29 minutes ago, stato said:
Its very easy to get the answers to 4 and 5, its in their annual and half annual reports.
second half of 2018 they made £120+m revenue, of which £40m was profit, so 30% of what you pay for something is profit. Individual items will swing obviously with 'savings' items like starter sets not making as much as separate kits. But the fact is overall they only make 30% profit from money we give them, so dont see how them trying to increase that to 31% is indefensible.
I haven't looked at their reports, but are you getting that number by removing all of their expenses barring those inherently required to make the products?
If they have invested in a new factory etc for example, then that would eat into the profit heavily and simply looking at profit vs revenue would not tell you how much they make on kits.
Especially so if they have made large purchases recently that are not likely to be a quarterly / yearly etc outlay which reduced profit.
Another aspect as well is do they break down sales from China made stuff separately too (I doubt it) ? That would also have different profit margins. If you lump them together you wouldnt get an accurate number for either.
-
Friend was at GW yesterday and was told by staff goblin tome in next couple weeks
Is this confirmed?
-
Goblins or riot. (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Nurgle bloodbowl looking awesome though.
- 1
- 3
-
57 minutes ago, gnaleinad said:
Don't ask me how I know.
1st half 2019
Destruction focus
Moonclan + Gitmob + Spiderfang + GreenskinzNew models and new saga.
As in 4 separate factions, or one book?
-
10 minutes ago, AwareTheLegend said:
Maggotkin and newer were all designed with 2.0 in mind.
To be fair he did say one of, not the first.
That said, there aren't any 'wow' aspects to the new tome for sce, at least not for me. A little disappointing but not entirely unexpected.
-
The more I see it, the more I'm praying for an alternate head
New scion is awesome though, it really sucked how it felt practically a non factor before.
-
Does stormcaller specify unit?
I hope this isn't another evocators style unclear wording. Even when the intent is somewhat obvious.
-
Love that sword
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, Walrustaco said:
Also, it's cropped at the bottom but the thing looks like it's wearing a bib
I mean, it looks somewhat prone to drooling. Wouldn't want to mess up his shiny armour ?
-
1 hour ago, Walrustaco said:
Oh dear. Now the melee special rule makes sense. Every time they wound it in melee they might gaze upon its majestic face and risk letting their guard down in a fit of laughter.
- 4
-
41 minutes ago, bsharitt said:
They showed the gitmob grot shaman when talking about a Moonclan grot shaman abilitiy. Sure it could be a mistake, but that makes for terrible rumor mongering. They're clearly merging all the grots into one big battletome that is going to be so awesome, they're going to have to do AoS 3.0 right on the heels of 2.0 just to contain it. You heard it here first.
I sincerely hope it comes soon, my goblins have waited long enough to see battle! ?
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Riavan said:
Would be great. But ykno, chaos because being edgy is cooler.
So do we think the goblins and darkoath will be the next releases?
Personally I'd err toward goblin and slaanesh based on the preview pics.
-
-
13 minutes ago, Melcavuk said:
If you mean the start collecting boxes they typically last until a new one is issued, given that Tzeentch has only recently been updated I cant see their Start Collecting disappearing anytime soon.
Battleforce Tzeentch Arcanites Changecult
Think he means the battleforce above, not the start collecting.
Unfortunately I don't know the answer to his question
-
3 minutes ago, sorokyl said:
https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-WW/Colossal-Squig
Isnt it just a colossal squig? Is it a plastic copy of the FW resin kit?
-
20 minutes ago, Shadowspite said:
The shape of the glaives makes it pretty clear they're meant to be undead skaven. We don't really expect GW to do 100% accurate rodent osteology, do we?
Doesnt look like any skaven spear ive seen
-
-
5 minutes ago, bsharitt said:
There were skaven shown, they just happened to be dead. Stop being so picky ?
Where? Must've missed those
-
Stormcast flying dragon? Or is it high elves alongside the dragon knight things?
-
https://mobile.twitter.com/GeekJockPete/status/995252183091286016/video/1
The Rumour Thread
in Age of Sigmar Discussions
Posted · Edited by silentdeathz
Seems like a bit of a misnomer to be calling them "free" or "freebies" really. They aren't "free" as if GW is doing you a big favour to their own detriment, they are just boxes with slightly lower profit margins for GW.
That may not even be the case either, as the form factor of the boxes and the higher purchase price to shelf/container space etc may actually mitigate the lower face profit vs individual sales etc.
On top of that, the boxes often seem to throw in units that are often not that great / optimal in actual game terms and would likely not be recommended / bought as a first set if people were buying these boxes individually.
So you could say it's not much of a deal at all if taking that perspective, which seems just as valid as calling them "free" models.
If you want your army so only consist of those units sold in the SC. But if the bundle was called "saver bundle" or "battleforce" I feel like most peoples opinion on "should only be buying one" would change. Also, it's not a simple thing to say that its bad for profit to allow people to collect armies more cheaply, since it's not easy to account for the benefits of further saturation / increased sales volume etc. People getting armies cheaper doesn't inherently mean less profit.
Feels a little bit like I see you chip in to be antagonistic toward people instead of actually engaging with them regarding their views. You replied again here and expanded a bit on what you were thinking but your first post was literally
Which is not only worthless but essentially inflammatory if you ask me.
Anyhow, this is the rumour thread and this is probably just going way off topic...