Jump to content

Entombet

Members
  • Posts

    317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Entombet

  1. WTS Seraphon Army painted to very good standard 2000$
    Battletome
    Enhancement cards
    Warscroll cards
    Kroak
    Slaan
    Troglodon
    Astrolith
    Starseer
    Starpriest
    10 Saurus Warriors
    16 3d printed Saurus Guards (you can make 2 units 5 models with full command group or 1 10)
    30 Skinks
    15 raptadon chargers (5 models magnetized to field as chargers or hunters)
    3 Terradons
    Spawn of chotec
    6 3d printed Hunters of Huanchi with dartpipes
    Realmshaper Engine
    Tracked shipping included in price

    FB_IMG_1697605604226.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605601012.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605597814.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605593996.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605590862.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605587956.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605584273.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605580456.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605576909.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605569669.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605565385.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605559617.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605554716.jpg

    FB_IMG_1697605550270.jpg

    • Like 2
    • LOVE IT! 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Magnus The Blue said:

    They stop rend.  Although in fairness 3 is enough in Petrefex who ignore 1 rend already.

     

    "Idiots with Flags" Gatebreakers are just amazing.  The ability to toss a 2+/2+/-3/4 rock should not be underestimated.  Makes it even hard to play the objective game against us.

    I thought you cant stack bonuses in 3.0?

  3. 42 minutes ago, Rahxephon said:

    Do you think having characters by themselves in the ships makes them too vulnerable? 

    I havent had them in compartment haulers, just usual transports with some other units.

    With the garrison and look out sir bonuses its a bit disgusting to try shoot them so havent had people try.  But just garrison bonuses I could imagine itd be worth trying in some instances.

    Then again it doesnt do much for magic. Might depend on who you tend to verse.

    Im 2000p battle i think i would not do that, perhaps zilfin khemist with spell.

  4. 1 hour ago, El Syf said:

    And Gotrek stayed the same. He is a negative play experience more so then Petrifex were in my opinion.

    Petrifex still died, maybe Mortek guard should have been exempt from the +1 save given their ability but I really don't see why everything else had to suffer.

    By contrast in every game I've played against Gotrek I've never been able to kill him. I've tried swamping him with horde units to tie him up, which doesn't take him too long to chew through and i've tried the other route of sending VLOZD + Morghasts into him for high rend, high damage attacks (which leads to disappointment as he just shrugs them off) and then spirit host for mortal wounds which he also gets a 3+ ward against! I now just refuse to play against lists with him in as I have found it to be no fun whatsover to play against. People moan about how bad Nagash was is; he's another 340 more points than the dwarf and nowhere near as survivable.

    You do not kill gotrek, you just avoid him

    • Like 10
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  5. 42 minutes ago, Elves are the best said:

    Because

    1. Its a 660 point model that can be shot off the table turn 1 by any serious shooting thats a third off your army just gone

    2. Its a 660 point model with a 4+ save

     3. I know he's not supposed to be a combat monster but his maximum damage output in one turn if combat is eighteen. come on !

    Compared to Alarielle 

    1. She costs less and can hide behind trees so she doesn't get shot off

    ( She can also bring on 200 points of free sylvenath

    2. She has a 3+  save and can heal in her hero phase 

    3.She has much better damage and the beetle does impact hits

    Teclis is just a bit risky.  I don think he's worth his points because all he's good at is magic and yes he is very good at that

    If i remember right she cant hide behind trees becouse she fly, or the new sylvaneth rules changed that?

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, zilberfrid said:

    The issue is, again, in phrasing.

    It would be clear if it stated

    "Spells or endless spells cast by enemy wizards"

    "Endless spells, or spells cast by enemy wizards"

    "Endless spells controlled by enemy wizards or spells cast by enemy wizards"

    The current wording falls in the middle of the first two, nudging towards the second. The intended wording, in my opinion, is the third.

    Good god, GW and their wordings strike again.

  7. 4 hours ago, zilberfrid said:

    If you're not facing a GA Order Teclis with lots of cheap units and area Endless spells to deliver 40d3 MW per turn (his aura doesn't state the endless spells need to be controlled by enemies), I'd argue the Cathaller needs to die first. I really hate that warscroll. Widening the difference between having BS immunity and not, and killing through everyone's favourite mechanic, battleshock.

    40d3 wounds, how?

  8. 29 minutes ago, GDD said:

    The hero building rules have been leaked. As suspected it's hard to build a KO hero that uses our wargear, but the +1 to saves or hits command abilities are pretty darn useful.

    I doubt it will be used in matched play

×
×
  • Create New...