pnkdth
-
Posts
645 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by pnkdth
-
-
3 minutes ago, Neil Arthur Hotep said:
I am really glad to see that the initial demand for Old World is high. If you look through this thread, you can frequently find me expressing doubt that there would be enough interest in a Bretonnia/Tomb Kings launch and a revival of old WHFB models. So I am happy to have been wrong on that and I like that people are really getting hyped about the game. Let's hope it results in sustained interest!
Aye, the hobby (not just GW) is getting better and better. More is more!
-
1
-
-
18 minutes ago, KingBrodd said:
CHAOS DUARDIN ARE COMING.
And with the entire line gone and rules legends it makes me hopeful for one heck of a release. As in full, from the ground up, reimagining for AoS.
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, The Lost Sigmarite said:
You haven't seen some Old World players on the Internet...
The question I have is why people keep focusing on this group of players. Let them wallow in their self-pity and bitterness while the rest of us enjoy the hobby in whichever form it takes.
I'm quite excited for TOW since I used to play a lot back during 6th-7th edition. I know I won't be gatekeeping anyone just because they bring/proxy AoS models because this hobby is expensive enough as it is. I'll just be happy for a game regardless of the setting.
-
13
-
-
7 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:
There's no need to be stressed about some plastic
soldierscows and goats.Very expensive plastic cows and goats with hours upon hours invested in building and painting them, it needs to be said.
On a whole though, I agree, spiralling downwards doom and gloom seems premature since there are several small(er) factions who seem to be ignored only get brought back into the light. In terms of rules, I think BoC has one of the cooler tomes out there. All they need is a bit of a refresher model-wise and they'll be up to snuff again.
I wouldn't be surprised to see BoC get a wave of releases similar to FEC/Sylvaneth during 4th (or late 3rd if 4th is further down the line than the rumours suggest). Looking at the model range of AoS the factions in my most dire need of new models are BoC/Skaven/Ogors. All of these factions have models dating quite a ways back into WHFB.
And with the Chorf hints... I'm going to be on a very weird cocktail of hopium, copium, and hypium.
-
I think BoC is going to see a renewal similar to FEC. Morghur or something like it as their centre-piece along with some fresh units to either add to or replace ageing sculpts. I fully expect some units to be retired though.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Captaniser said:
Please...I am starving.
A leak, just a small one...can save me.
Quick before it is too late.
Copium and flextape ads, my friend.
-
7 minutes ago, Tonhel said:
Why? Lots of fellow hobbyist are exciting and happy. In a couple of weeks there is the release of FEC. Which has one of the most impressive GW miniatures ever made. There will also be more dawnbringer stuff and after that there is 4th edition. Lots of stuff for AoS. GW is not only AoS ;-). Imo there was never a better time to be in the hobby.
And it has also been mentioned that lots of the TOW stuff can easily be used for AoS. Already seen people buzzing over the TK bits for SBGL (I also think we'll see plenty of them sneaking their way in DoT armies). The Bret release is perfect for those who want more restrained design for their CoS army, i.e. wanting a more balanced look in terms of detail since the new CoS models are packed with details which can create an issue where every part of the army keeps shouting for attention.
On in other words, more options for different kinds themes and aesthetics. Win-win my book.
-
2
-
-
7 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:
It is fun, indeed, but maybe if an AoS mini takes the first spot it could lead to some top-level decisions in favour of AoS, don't we think? Or am I going too far?
Different categories would be pretty nice. Like Best Vehicle, Best Monster, Best Character model, etc etc etc. Showcasing a wider aspect of the hobby feels better than simply "best mini" since the various minis look good in different ways. From a GW perspective it would also tell them which minis are being appreciated in different categories.
-
4
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:
I saw a discussion about whether they are more AoS-like in terms of sculpt than WHFB-like. What do we think? IMO there's a clear difference in terms of the sculpt of this minis with something from AoS, but some users think the other way around.
I am not concerned with that at all. The realms is a big place so there's room for lots of variation. If someone see an opportunity to create an AoS army using TOW units we should applaud and encourage it. The setting of AoS is huge and not entirely defined which makes it exciting. No one has the right to police what is and isn't AoS.
I'm so done with AoS versus TOW/WHFB discussions, in general, since I think it is irrelevant. At worst, the discussion have become very gatekeepy and bitter. Sure, some WHFB fans acted poorly (and some still do) but if the AoS community continues the cycle is on, in the general sense, us. In a lot of ways I'm just tired of "us versus them" thinking that seems to be more and more common. No matter what there's always someone who has to go on a long rant about 40k/marines/LRL/etc. I just don't care anymore. The hobby is supposed to be fun and an expression of our creativity.
Edit: I think I might have been misinterpreted the question. As for looking more AoS or WHFB I think it will come down how they're modelled/painted. I'll let my original post stand so no one gets confused and people can enjoy my rash reply.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, Kronos said:
This is why I've been saying from the get-go that TOW will be an amazing addition to AoS. I can see these as perfect kitbashes for SBGL/NH. I can also see Tzeentch loving the heck of these.
The TOW release just keeps getting better and better.
-
3
-
-
5 minutes ago, Ejecutor said:
Yeah, I am not following 30k/40k that much. Just a personal opinion. I guess, seeing the feedback to my idea, that Space Marines users are happy buying the same armour sculpt over and over.
It is very difficult to reinvent an established setting. Especially when lots of people are sitting on pretty big collections now. They've gradually introduced different kinds of armour (gravis, phobos, etc) in addition to the primaris stuff (and they're probably not done as far that goes either). Doing something more extreme would risk alienating a huge part of their customers and the design of the marines is extremely recognisable. I do not think GW would ever risk something like that unless something drastic happens.
They'd be better off expanding Custodes/Grey Knights line. Alternatively, have the adeptus mechanicus invent some new spicy teetering on the brink of tech heresy robotic marines.
-
2
-
-
6 minutes ago, michu said:
I'm the other way around. I prefer when updates to armies stick to old aesthetic just with improved sculpts, not when they change completely.
*looks angrily at the new CoS...*
And potentially missing the mark with a new design of marines would be disastrous for GW. Risking to upset existing fans in order to appease people who, probably, won't invest in marines regardless of how they look is not an option.
Also, asking for a marine refresh would be asking for even more marines releases for years to come.
-
4
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, MitGas said:
But right now it feels like putting a female head on a fyreslayer and go "there - here's your female version. Be happy".
That's a different case, mainly because of the lack of armour. In those cases there needs to be more options on the sprue.
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Snarff said:
That's not going to go over well with a certain very vocal part of that fanbase, lmao
We can only hope. The further way those people are from the hobby the better. Thankfully, they're mostly a vocal minority who has nothing better to do than to stir things up.
-
8
-
-
50 minutes ago, Twisted Firaun said:
GOOD NEWS EVERYONE!!!
I have found a way to make the new vampire character even more closely tied to LONG LOST NEHEKHARA!!! by placing a mask from the old Tomb Guard kit on top of the face. Naturally, this will require waiting for TOW, as I cannot find the old Tomb Guard kit for a decent price, or the bits on eBay..... NEVERTHELESS I SHALL WAIT FOR THE OLD WORLD WITH AN EVEN GREATER INTENSITY!!!!
It is also refreshing to see a non-stereotypical vampire. She really got that corpse-like, Necrach, appearance. I am not saying all AoS vampires are boring but the majority of them looks pretty much how you expect vampires to look in fantasy. To see something with a definite connection to Nehekhara is a breath of fresh air. With the arrival of more TK bits being readily available I can finally revive a personal project I've been wanting to do.
TOW is going to be a really useful for inspiration even if not interested in the game itself. For CoS players the new bret line is going to be perfect.
-
3
-
-
I think it looks reptilian. With a pronounced lower jaw, however, it is too "brutal" to be Seraphon. My guess is CSM.
I do not think it is Kroot since their design tend to be closer to a snapping turtle (more beaky).
Also, could be something KB related since it has a certain cruelty and viciousness to it not unlike other KB beasties.
Copium says BoC though.
-
8 minutes ago, Luperci said:
If GW actually made all the cool stuff that's in TW:W maybe people would jump over more. I was hoping cathay and kislev would get full new armies based on the initial previews but it doesn't look like that's happening anytime soon
It will probably happen at some point (like the new TK bone dragon). The advantage of a GW game is that they are able to play the long game. Ideally anyways
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Ejecutor said:
Imo Total War playerbase won't move into minis.
It is a massive advert for the game. Even though it might not be a direct funnel (as in all of them) there are definitely people who will start to consume both lore and gameplay vids. Channels like PancreasNoWork, for example, is probably notice an upswing in views since he taps into both.
In the end it is going benefit fantasy tabletop in general (AoS especially since is a continuation of the setting) because a new game lives and dies on remaining in the minds of people. TOW definitely got that going for it.
This is why I am so hoping for a successful AoS game which makes people wanna nerd out on the setting and get into it.
-
3
-
-
14 minutes ago, Malakithe said:
This is a terrible way of thinking. Thats like if GW added a donate button to their webpage and people just clicked that.
If you dont like the minis dont buy them simply because.
He wants the system to succeed. A general donation would not indicate support for TOW.
-
6
-
-
31 minutes ago, Preppikoma said:
I voted for Vashtorr, as we had finally got the Soul Forge overperson, and I find the model fantastic. #everydaemonmodelisaninsertanyWarhammersettingmodel
After seeing that mini I am so hoping for a Dark Mechanicum codex. That stuff could go wild in the best of ways.
-
3
-
-
Suddenly I feel like creating a Tau and marine army just to annoy people.
Edit: For the greater good of the imperium, I suppose.
-
New armies are fun, however, there are factions in the game right now who should not have to wait for a range refresh.
Ogors, Skaven, and Beastmen in particular comes to mind. Fyreslayers also deserve a proper wave of new minis to fully realise the faction.
Expand on other cities, build on the cosmopolitan and multi-racial/factional collaborations that makes CoS so interesting. Though this is probably a loooooong way ahead, if ever.
Then focus on new factions in whatever order. Chorfs, Shadow Elves, etc, etc.
-
3
-
-
I can already tell this is going to look awesome.
-
1
-
-
37 minutes ago, Lord Krungharr said:
What do people think of this? Would that upset anyone?
Lovecraft is just a single author and cosmic horror as a genre has grown into so much more. The man is long gone but the mythos he created still capture many people's imagination. There is a cosmic void between engaging in the mythos and endorsing his personally held beliefs.
In short, I'd love to see where you take this.
-
4
-
1
-
The Rumour Thread
in Age of Sigmar Discussions
Posted
None. BoC and Hashut worship (Chorfs) would mostly likely be mortal enemies since Chorfs want dominion and amass power to fuel their industry whereas BoC would do their very best to put sticks in their wheels so to speak. Hashut is about greed and tyranny... And fire. FS have a very different kind of "fire" theme since it is organic wheres Chorfs' fire and steam power come from the furnaces and war machines + daemonic fire entities.
In other words, overlapping themes does not mean overlapping interests/motives since their origins and results vary greatly. Which is why it also makes little sense when some suggest BoC would work as a Destruction faction. Because if we go down that road most non-order factions could easily be put in Destruction too.
https://warhammerfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Hashut Has more on Hashut. Old world lore but it gives insight on Chorfs and how Hashut may interact with AoS. It also makes me very interested in what the design team comes up when Chorfs enters AoS in force. Very exciting times.